Banno

Grist to the mill. Check out why you should be talking with gpt about philosophy From that article, another prompting strategy:

Cheers. Hope my rumination are not too mundane.

A crap film. It's a performative contradiction. Ah! There's the proof! He denies it again! Even if - and I want to make this perfectly clear - even if...

Fried eggs, therefore, are a leap of faith. Cool. So the true reality is that true reality is unknown... No. I'm pointing out your part in the conspir...

That's quite incoherent. I can judge that the chooks have laid an egg by their chortles. Therefor the villainous deed in which you are complicit start...

What's the relevance of that? More secret messages.

You seem to think that post said something. I wonder what.

Straight out of Anscombe. But yes, the common problem in @"Copernicus"'s threads is the failure to acknowledge the other.

SO you didn't follow the argument? Your OP is a signal to nefarious actors to institute their plans. We know this, despite your denials and protests. ...

The charitable explanation for your reply is that you did not understand my post.

What do you think you are doing here? You want our responses, but don't reciprocate. Why? Should we respond to you respectfully, or ignore you?

No, it isn't. Wittgenstein said nothing of the sort.

Something has gone astray here, in. that if this were so, it's not just that we have never said anything, but that the very notion of saying something...

A man is working a hand pump. A simple physical description. What is his intent? Is it to replenish the water supply? Is he exercising? Is it to mix t...

Yep, that's what I was getting at before. We might use Austin's terminology. The AI at least presents us with a locution - a sequence of words in some...

No. They are, as you say, operators. If you think "^" a symmetrical expansion of identity, "=", show how. You can't, because they are very different t...

, , cheers to you both - I would that it were so, too, but it ain't, and so here we are. Perhaps we might best keep that part of the discussion in 's ...

I was struck by this: So the AI is saying that it is not an interlocutor... Is that a performative contradiction? If it's not an interlocutor, then no...

Then I succeeded. I hope you don't mind my starting a new thread rather than adding to your already existing one. I think the topic sufficiently disti...

For those of you who are having trouble articulating a good counter-argument, here's what ChatGPT said when I prompted it with the OP, prefixed with "...

You seem to want to capture something poetic in formal logic. Trouble is that formal logic has very fixed rules. There is poetry in formal logic, for ...

Two very different biconditionals.

I just think needs a better butcher.

You missed so much.

Nice. I'll say no more.

Probably wasn't lamb? a forequarter chop’s got enough fat in it to stay tender even when overdone.

There are a few logic courses around. The Stanford one is pretty good, but clunky in its presentation. Language, proof and Logic at EdX also looked go...

Ok, but again, the relationship is true - but does it define truth? I asked ChatGPT to pull out the argument in your post, and it offered: Condensed A...

Sure. it might help us identify some good on line stuff if you list your interests. I highly commend the EdX philosophy and critical thinking course. ...

Perhaps you would benefit from a reading of some of the literature on intentionality. Anscombe, maybe. "Jack turned on the light" is neither selfish n...

Does this say more than that a=a is true? That doesn't tell us what truth is. Clever words can trick one into thinking that what one is saying is prof...

Welcome. Sounds like you want to move from reading philosophy to doing philosophy. It might seem that a forum such as this would be ideal, but while i...

Thanks. It's neat. I like comparisons.

Yep.

Here's a paper that directly links a particular project to the damage it will cause: Quantifying the regional to global climate impacts of individual ...

Not so uninteresting as some. So sure, take Maxwell's equations and apply gauge symmetry, and "the answer just jumps out"; but don't then claim that t...

Well, yes, but in so far as we are concerned with what we believe - what we hold to be the case - we are in an anthropocentric position. And do you th...

I do miss stuff - shit, 30,000 mentions... I need to get out more. And there are folk I just don't read, but that does not include you. Thanks.

Nice. We have to take care here with what we do, though. Hume was looking for a justification for the move from specific instances to general rules. I...

Cheers.

Yes, I suppose so. So how to proceed. I suspect that, as with most of these sorts of problems, it's as much about the choice of wording as the way thi...

Cheers. If there is something in particular that I ought follow up on, let me know.

indeed.

You are not seeing the contradiction in which you choose to live. Oh well.

That explains quite a bit.

So you constructed me? You poor thing.

Deduce? Nothing - that's the point! Soon after you start listening. Good night.

So you have a brain. The mess gets bigger. Then, a universe, to blur your vision. So are we happy now that there is more than is "inside your head"? C...

Sure. But not made by your head. Then there is error. If everything is in your mind, how can you make sense of being mistaken? You are mistaken when w...

Only what I'm saying isn't yours. It comes from outside your head. Surprise, novelty.