You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Banno

Comments

Before you so quickly give the thumbs up, look at what Leon is saying. I gave reference to a thread that leads to a book and a whole literature that s...
October 26, 2025 at 21:28
It's not baseless. You would oblige others to express only your attitudes. Have a think about why folk might draw this sort of comparison, even if unj...
October 26, 2025 at 21:23
Why am I not surprised. I suppose you have your "reasons", the upshot being that your attitudes amount to natural law. Now a "bigot" is someone "obsti...
October 26, 2025 at 21:19
A review of the book in Philosophy Now: Barriers to Entailment by Gillian Russell
October 26, 2025 at 04:11
One analogue might be knitting. John starts with green wool, so the first row is green, and so is the second, and the third. So far all the rows are g...
October 26, 2025 at 00:26
It'd been in the greenhouse for a few years, with some success, but it proved ungainly and unmanageable, so I've found it a place on a north wall. I d...
October 25, 2025 at 21:54
The US has an infatuation with free speech not found elsewhere. Or rather, it pretends to allow anyone to say what they please, the practical outcome ...
October 25, 2025 at 21:32
Again, I did not report this thread. And I am here, presenting arguments. And again, you would make this a thread about me, fabricating responses inst...
October 25, 2025 at 01:18
My apologies - that was not intentional. Jamal will do as he pleases. I was simply wishing to stay out of his way. I did no such thing. However to be ...
October 25, 2025 at 00:54
Your show of kindness is admirable. It should be made explicit that the views advocated in the OP are not only fraught with philosophical difficulties...
October 25, 2025 at 00:01
Perhaps there are limits on sharing my share back to us... But will we settle on they/them?
October 24, 2025 at 23:51
And so to the central argument. Definition 1 sets out what is meant by extending a model. A model, again, is a bunch of individuals that have been ass...
October 24, 2025 at 22:54
We can settle this. Common curtesy suggests we just ask. :wink:
October 24, 2025 at 22:31
So did I, in the first draft.
October 24, 2025 at 21:33
Gobbledegook. Buried somewhere in there is the simple notion that it is people who interpret computer output, not computers. Fine. Except when a compu...
October 24, 2025 at 21:12
I'm here, Bob. Happy to continue - I held off because it looked to me as if might be about to do something in accord with the guidelines, but it seems...
October 24, 2025 at 21:00
Send my thread off to the lounge now, maybe? I think it's done it's part.
October 24, 2025 at 10:38
So "They/them". Good idea.
October 24, 2025 at 06:08
Yep, it worked. I see you are falling for the mystery of AI... even thanking it for its responses. We live in interesting times.
October 24, 2025 at 04:29
Yeah, I know. The chat with suckered me, and i was going to do more on the Gillian Russell thread. Might make more tea.
October 24, 2025 at 04:25
Share button in top right > public access > copy link See if it worked: https://claude.ai/share/343bc57c-998e-4faa-a541-6eb4396cd974
October 24, 2025 at 04:20
I stopped past to see what was happening while I had lunch, (Mediterranean Kofta, olives, cheese and kewpie in a wrap) and I'm still here... I've move...
October 24, 2025 at 04:11
You seem to be meandering. Thanks for the chat.
October 24, 2025 at 03:59
The link didn't work.
October 24, 2025 at 03:55
ChatGPT does, but not Claude; or that is my understanding.
October 24, 2025 at 03:40
Sure. But you conclude that there fore we cannot choose between traditions. That doesn't follow. The choice may not be objective - what choice is? - b...
October 24, 2025 at 03:38
Are you saying we ought not respect tradition? Of course not. That you did not use the word is irrelevant. It is a normative list, pretending to be fa...
October 24, 2025 at 03:20
What's interesting - or suspicious - is that what it has said is pretty much along the lines of my conversations with it about Davidson and Wittgenste...
October 24, 2025 at 03:11
The lie here, over this whole thread, is that you are making a choice and advocating an attitude, while pretending that it is the inevitable consequen...
October 24, 2025 at 03:06
I think Frank's answer is better in a way... I'm suspicious about how close GPT's answer is to the one I woudl have given... "To “understand” truth, i...
October 24, 2025 at 02:42
Yeah, we can. And do. Violence is a choice.
October 24, 2025 at 02:31
Then maybe you might benefit from reading more widely on liberalism? There's a strong liberalism in many forms of christianity, for a start, and a lib...
October 24, 2025 at 02:12
For those who have the time: https://youtu.be/k1SiZCtPsq4
October 24, 2025 at 01:09
So to some detail on Section Two. Russell cites "you can’t get a universal sentence from particular ones" as the paradigmatic case, and sets about def...
October 24, 2025 at 01:06
Again, this is not what liberalism calls for. Rather, we can look for that on which we have agreement - the view not from nowhere, but from anywhere.
October 24, 2025 at 00:52
The interplay between traditions remains unaddressed. Reason or violence? From over here, it looks as if the problems had in the USA at present are a ...
October 24, 2025 at 00:50
I did opt for fried. A sturdy wholemeal, which will do the requisite soaking and allow one to raise the bread from plate to mouth without soiling one'...
October 24, 2025 at 00:47
But why? Why not test Zionism against Mohism? How do you move from "This is what we do" to "this is what we ought do?" without falling to the Naturali...
October 24, 2025 at 00:41
A good argument, and one I have myself borrowed, after Austin, in defence of analytic approaches to language: But let's look at what you have said, an...
October 24, 2025 at 00:38
Again, quite inaccurate. Liberalism uses - invented - strong notions of positive freedom. There's a line from Kant and freedom as autonomy, through Ro...
October 23, 2025 at 23:58
Yes! In Wittgenstein's terms, it can't (yet) participate in the "form of life". In Searle's terms, it doesn't share in the "background". But I'm less ...
October 23, 2025 at 23:39
Yep. Notice that you are here stipulating that whatever a bunch of circuits does, it's not thinking... Which is fine, and I agree; but we ought keep i...
October 23, 2025 at 23:12
Cheers. I'll leave the thread to you for now.
October 23, 2025 at 22:48
No, you are not. I can lead you to the water, and so on. Read some modal logic. Or read my many many posts on the topic. Essences are stipulated, not ...
October 23, 2025 at 22:44
Yes. That's what the OP deserves. In essence, it says that "if I ignore the difference between sex and gender, I can continue in my bigotry".
October 23, 2025 at 22:33
Superficially, one might think that the difference between an AI is exactly that we do have private, hidden intent; and the AI doesn't. Something like...
October 23, 2025 at 22:26
The natural language use of "necessary" is ambiguous. And "it must be the case that..." is not quite the same as "It is necessarily the case that..." ...
October 23, 2025 at 21:40
And who is the arbiter of this "nature"? The presumption that the contents of one's underpants ought determine one's social role is morally bankrupt.
October 23, 2025 at 21:08
The problem is more that your exposure has not been to more recent developments.
October 23, 2025 at 20:39
I don't see why.
October 23, 2025 at 20:38