You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Banno

Comments

In: Realism  — view comment
Hmm. Let's check. Did I address your last post? Sure, that's Dummet's anti realism. It takes realism to be the view that truth is recognition - transc...
October 14, 2021 at 01:35
They're already called world-to-word and word-to-world. Active and passive would confuse the issue. But yes, that's the hypothesis of the other thread...
October 14, 2021 at 00:58
Well, yes, but see the intro to my realism thread: It's more a question of which, when than of either/or. Are there five spoons on the table when we h...
October 13, 2021 at 23:55
Oh, and while going through my old threads, there is this one: "1" does not refer to anything.
October 13, 2021 at 22:27
So you infer that there is a ghost in the machine in order that there can be five spoons on the table even when they go uncounted. Presumably the spir...
October 13, 2021 at 22:19
True. There's a reason for that. Wiki uses verified sources.
October 13, 2021 at 10:33
There's a call for a re-write of the Wikipedia article on the private language argument. Call for rewrite If you know this stuff, have a go.
October 13, 2021 at 09:03
Yep. Magic. The statement you make when you are not making a statement.
October 13, 2021 at 06:10
Are they? I would have said they were just statements that are either true or false. I had no idea that they were magical. So the proposition is what ...
October 12, 2021 at 23:29
But what happens when you take the images seriously? see Chris Mortensen. eg: Inconsistent Mathematics, Reutersvärd, And Buddhism: An Interview With C...
October 12, 2021 at 22:49
So one might think, but because maths is made up we can develop little intricacies by thinking otherwise. Inconsistent mathematical systems are a thin...
October 12, 2021 at 22:34
I baulked at this the first time I read it, but on re-reading I gather the emphasis is on representing; as in word do not represent reality, but are t...
October 12, 2021 at 21:39
Sort of. If you know the truth conditions for a statement, what more could you need? Well, quite a bit, as his holism indicates. Who is avoiding propo...
October 12, 2021 at 21:22
How is the halting problem relevant to the number of spoons on the table? As if that any consistent formal system within which a certain amount of ele...
October 12, 2021 at 20:49
So he should believe the symptoms you make up. Fine.
October 12, 2021 at 08:51
Good comeback. Is the line something distinct from the two points? I think it must be, since it includes all the points in between. If it is, is it th...
October 12, 2021 at 04:33
Witti's thinking might be along the lines that if the Liar's paradox is something we make up, then it is a game to one side of the mathematics of brid...
October 12, 2021 at 04:28
If that is all he is claiming, then that'd be cool. But ...seems to imply more; a difference in logical status. I'm somewhat ill-disposed to Sokal, fi...
October 12, 2021 at 04:11
But you said that what is made up is subjective. Is Lord of the Rings subjective? What does that mean? I think it pretty clear that equating made up a...
October 12, 2021 at 04:06
Really? I don't think so.
October 12, 2021 at 02:40
But if it is subjective, it's private, and hence not part of our conversation. Further, what sense is one to make of inter-subjective? Something is bo...
October 12, 2021 at 02:23
There's that subjective/objective confusion again. it's not all either subjective or objective, and never the twain. Is Chess "in your head"?
October 12, 2021 at 02:15
That your mind is elsewhere doubtless explains the paucity of your reply.
October 12, 2021 at 00:35
So tell me the answer. After all, that's what you are for.
October 11, 2021 at 23:58
In: Realism  — view comment
Then is seems we are both realists, except that you call yourself an antirealist. Odd.
October 11, 2021 at 22:07
Realism has to be un-learned. It takes sophistication. Idealism, more so.
October 11, 2021 at 01:51
In: Realism  — view comment
After considering the Devitt article, we might proceed. Realism is about there being stuff. Whether our statements about that stuff are true or false ...
October 10, 2021 at 22:03
IV. Verificationisim and Realism realism, truth and understanding are distinct; they can be related by inference, not entailment (p.97) Realism has pr...
October 10, 2021 at 21:14
In regard to the argument around p. 95. Devitt sees Dummett as adopting the slogan "meaning is use"; I've recollections of this being dismissed as a m...
October 10, 2021 at 20:51
III Competence as a practical ability Considering now B2 and C2 Dummett must show that all truth conditions are verificationist (p.90) Devitt's versio...
October 10, 2021 at 20:34
To an extent that might be right, noting that Devitt is criticising Dummett for moving from the metaphysics of mathematics to the metaphysics of the w...
October 10, 2021 at 19:54
II Conjectures B and C The flow of the argument is convolute. The section appears to flow as follows: strangeness of equating a semantic with a psycho...
October 09, 2021 at 23:41
Section I.3 is mislabeled III.3 in the paper. In that section Devitt claims that Dummet's approach is a direct transfer form his metaphysics of mathem...
October 09, 2021 at 04:58
yes, but curiously there is this from the first page of the article: Something is odd here.
October 09, 2021 at 00:00
Doubtless, but I have been unable to follow your argument, especially in your new thread. Tying the discussion to an article may help.
October 08, 2021 at 23:57
In: Realism  — view comment
So we do agree, at least on that definition. Then you are right, I have misunderstood Dummet; "Dummett is packing more into the notion of truth than t...
October 08, 2021 at 21:28
Your "quite the opposite" is the same as I sugested, so it seems you are a man of your word.
October 08, 2021 at 20:47
In: Realism  — view comment
I wrote a short thesis in my Honours year on this topic under the supervision of a chap who was a student of Watkins. I've read more since - that was ...
October 08, 2021 at 06:15
Then I'm not at all sure what your task is in this thread. But then, logic is simply playing with symbols, isn't it? What more was expected? Thanks fo...
October 08, 2021 at 02:04
In: Realism  — view comment
If we are going to consider Carnap, then we need to bring in Quine's criticism. IS it your plan to defend Carnap against Quine?
October 07, 2021 at 22:09
In: Realism  — view comment
Then we are simply using the name "antirealism" in different fashions. SO, what is antirealism? I gave this: I'll add that realism does permit us to s...
October 07, 2021 at 22:07
In: Realism  — view comment
Popper had to conceded that falsificationsim requires verisimilitude. Much of a muchness, both debunked.
October 07, 2021 at 22:02
In: Realism  — view comment
Yep. Seems pretty clear.
October 07, 2021 at 21:59
In: Realism  — view comment
Well, yes, but not just that. There are innumerable facts that are unverifiable. Verificationism deals with them by extending the notion of verificati...
October 07, 2021 at 21:57
In: Realism  — view comment
Bloody hell - look at tall the parentheses. That's doing my head in, since it looks as if you are both disagreeing with and yet asserting the same thi...
October 07, 2021 at 21:52
In: Realism  — view comment
The answer is that it is up to us to choose. Is that picture a duck or a rabbit? It's a picture that can be seen either way. Neither is obligatory. Fu...
October 07, 2021 at 21:40
In: Realism  — view comment
Again, you haven't shown this. It is open to a realist to say that we can give the same name to different things, as well as to things that change ove...
October 07, 2021 at 21:38