You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Banno

Comments

Sure, but think in terms of what we are doing rather than of meaning, and see that language is a part of what we are doing. It's what we do that is so...
November 19, 2021 at 00:35
By all means, fill that in. I suspect time only enters in a secondary sense, since use occurs over time. But it also occurs over place.
November 19, 2021 at 00:32
Yep.
November 18, 2021 at 23:57
Not sure what you are asking. It's not an either/or choice; the notion of intent found in Phenomenology comes into theories of naming, for example. I ...
November 18, 2021 at 23:57
Lest the relevance to the OP be lost, notice that the account of being given in the tradition of Frege, Russell, Quine and so on does not depend on ti...
November 18, 2021 at 23:33
If we are talking about folk you might expect to meet in the street, or read about in history books, then "Frodo doesn't exist" says that the name "Fr...
November 18, 2021 at 23:21
Sure, the games are recursive. Next?
November 18, 2021 at 22:56
So I suppose I am granting two ways of talking about being. The first is exemplified in ?(x)f(x), Quine's The second extends Quine's logic to allow fo...
November 18, 2021 at 22:38
Sure. Putting the pieces on the board is what Go consists in. But setting the game up is not playing the game; we need to keep track of which activity...
November 18, 2021 at 22:23
Who, as I said, got it from Husserl. I'm not much interested in who said it first, so much as who said it best - the point is to be clear about what i...
November 18, 2021 at 22:20
It's a property of properties, in one way.
November 18, 2021 at 22:03
What is the subject - following Frege? Is ?(x)f(x) to be understood as a relation between things that f and existence? I don't see that. ?(x)f(x) says...
November 18, 2021 at 22:02
No. That's wrong. Rather, in predicating to something one assumes that the something is there for discussion. "The cat is on the mat" presumes a cat. ...
November 18, 2021 at 21:35
Ethics is fundamentally about how one relates to others. Attempting to base ethics on how one feels, on "physical stimulus", is an error.
November 18, 2021 at 21:29
That's a difficult post. Take: Seeming is what we do to things, isn' it? This says that they seem to themselves. And this: ...which is... It's not a h...
November 18, 2021 at 21:21
Perhaps the one useful thing in phenomenology is that the cat is only on the mat because we pretend it is so. We can pretend things that are true. Oh,...
November 18, 2021 at 20:37
So... One cannot simply walk into Mordor? :gasp:
November 18, 2021 at 20:18
Roughly, to be is to be the subject of a predicate. Harry Potter is a fictional character. A mental picture of an apple is not an apple. It's a mental...
November 18, 2021 at 20:15
Existence is not like being a video, or a simulation, or a story. Would you buy front-row tickets to a concert, with back stage pass and after-gig par...
November 18, 2021 at 10:01
"an abstraction"...? What's that? What sort of thing is an abstraction? "subject to an individual perception..." Do you often see nonexistent apples? ...
November 18, 2021 at 08:32
I have to object. But things are as they are. That's logic, not realism. Sure, we see things only through our own perspective. Concluding from this th...
November 17, 2021 at 03:49
These paragraphs become less troubling if one thinks of them as having been rethought between the early and the later Wittgenstein. The issue is that,...
November 16, 2021 at 21:35
Excellent example. A film that should, along with Life of Brian, be watched once a year.
November 16, 2021 at 21:11
I pretty much concur. I'd add that we can, and do, move terms from one language game to another. Doing this changes the use of the term, of corse, bec...
November 16, 2021 at 21:09
Will do.
November 16, 2021 at 00:50
Yep. Fine. I answered your question and you get all huffy. Odd. OK, that'll do.
November 15, 2021 at 23:19
I suppose that, like Catholicism, Rand might serve as an introduction to doing philosophy. Freeing oneself from such nonsense as an introduction to cr...
November 15, 2021 at 22:17
Hey, it wasn't I who advocated "living as much time (seconds from your whole life) with pleasant feelings" - that was your good self. Nothing wrong wi...
November 15, 2021 at 22:12
I do. It' just that of course the community is fraught with conflict and strife; but that doesn't make what I said wrong.
November 15, 2021 at 22:08
So a truly fulfilling life would be to spend all one's time wanking. Hence these forums, I suppose. Might go do some gardening.
November 15, 2021 at 21:55
Actually, on looking at it again, I wonder if we might do better. Consider my other suggestion: Assume a bivalent logic. Then this statement is either...
November 15, 2021 at 21:51
It's more like the build up to the first war, with sides being taken for reasons of testosterone-induced posturing rather than on the basis of signifi...
November 15, 2021 at 21:30
There's something very odd happening here. One more try, perhaps. You asked: I responded with: ...pointing out that whether one assigns true or false ...
November 15, 2021 at 21:22
Sure. Whatever you say. You are not replying to what I have written anyway, so why would I respond. Your posts are so far off target that they are irr...
November 15, 2021 at 20:49
Neoliberalism? I don't know to whom you are replying, but it is not me. Cheers.
November 15, 2021 at 20:36
I think there must have been some misunderstanding. You seem to have said that the truth value of the sentence given in my post is a question of taste...
November 15, 2021 at 20:20
Thatcher? How incongruous.
November 15, 2021 at 20:14
Nice graph. I noted that the information-based/information theoretical option scored only 24%. I don't see how.
November 15, 2021 at 01:02
Oh, this weirdness is entirely down to you. You took the conversation off in this direction. If that now makes you uncomfortable, doubtless you now re...
November 14, 2021 at 23:34
And only if you are the passive partner.
November 14, 2021 at 23:22
Not without dinner and flowers.
November 14, 2021 at 23:17
Hmm. That's not what one sees in No Exit, nor in The Look. Notice that transcendence of the ego is early work. Perhaps you find Husserl because you ar...
November 14, 2021 at 23:06
Well, I don't quite agree with this reading of Sartre; but I might be misapprehending what you are saying. For Sartre, the self (the subject in subjec...
November 14, 2021 at 21:52
It's plain that the leap from "this has a cause" to "everything has a cause" is unjustified.
November 14, 2021 at 21:43
Only if you allow it to. “you can always make something out of what you've been made into”
November 14, 2021 at 21:07
It's not at all clear what this might be. Being-for-itself is defined by choice rather than experience. Being-for-itself is found in the decision to t...
November 14, 2021 at 20:48
Sartre is just Heidegger without the affectation or naziism... That's not a criticism!
November 14, 2021 at 19:53
That's right - it's about expressing ideas clearly.
November 14, 2021 at 06:44
Then the relation between a cause and its effect comes adrift, and any cause can be attributed to any effect. That is, the usefulness of the notion of...
November 14, 2021 at 01:11
Me, neither. What about you, @"Joshs"? It's just that even if the distinction between the in-self and the for-itself is a remnant of Kantian dualism, ...
November 14, 2021 at 00:51