You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Banno

Comments

@"Frank", As Fitch showed, antirealists know everything that is to be known. There are no true statements outside of what an antirealist knows. Unless...
December 02, 2025 at 21:44
Again, a world does not consist of a set of statements. But in addition, this argument is an obvious undistributed middle. B is A, C is A, therefore B...
December 02, 2025 at 21:41
I'm sorry, I found that post too long and meandering to follow. If there was a core point, it escaped me. We are addressing concerns about language us...
December 02, 2025 at 21:36
Have another look at this. You had previously agreed that language is no algorithmic. If you need to, go back to A Nice Derangement of Epitaphs and re...
December 02, 2025 at 21:26
If there is something that you think I've yet to respond to, set it out. I've pointed out that even if most people would understand "woman in the wood...
December 02, 2025 at 21:22
I'd like to see a direct response to this from @"Philosophim", @"I like sushi", @"Outlander", @"ProtagoranSocratist", and @"Jamal" as well as @"Janus"...
December 02, 2025 at 21:17
A good point, so I'll address it first. I waved a hand in the direction of Charlotte Witt earlier. Here's a ChatGPT response to "Summarise Charlotte W...
December 02, 2025 at 21:12
I suppose it might be seen as pretty unfair on Pinker. :wink: Yes, there is a significant difference in the tasks each has at hand, and you summarise ...
December 02, 2025 at 08:50
I think we could stretch to one each...
December 02, 2025 at 06:51
I'm into this stuff. Sugarwater, but seasonal and not displeasing... https://bundabergbarrel.com/cdn/shop/files/SpicedGingerBeer375mL_aa94e8f8-859d-46...
December 02, 2025 at 06:07
:smile:
December 02, 2025 at 06:01
I'll stop there and re-introduce Zaachariaha Fielding. I don't know Zaachariaha personally, but I'd be very pleased if I could call him a friend. Zaac...
December 02, 2025 at 05:20
That presumed equivalence between qualia and colour is... unjustified. Then qualia do not act as advertised; they are not private and ineffable. You h...
December 02, 2025 at 04:29
29.4k. Been a busy few days.
December 02, 2025 at 03:48
Sure. But not always. Which is enough to allow "A trans woman is a woman" in just the same way as "An ice chair is a chair". But I would not have lied...
December 02, 2025 at 03:46
I did this the other day, but it's easy enough to do it again. A possible world does not consist of stipulations, so much as a complete description of...
December 02, 2025 at 03:27
Here's an AI generated summary:
December 02, 2025 at 02:31
I wasn't able to follow most of that. I don't see why you think it not a fair analogy, unless you presuppose some form of essentialism. A chair must b...
December 02, 2025 at 02:22
And your reasoning has been repeatedly shown to be in error.
December 02, 2025 at 01:20
Yep. It's a curio. p??p is invalid without reflexivity.
December 02, 2025 at 01:15
You seem very confident about that. Fine. To me they are instances of the same sort of thing, and distinct from the sensation of that aroma. On the on...
December 02, 2025 at 00:16
SO you think demonstrates that it is more rational to think of "woman" as an adult human female rather than a transexual. What an odd argument. It mig...
December 02, 2025 at 00:04
@"Philosophim", put briefly, you have agreed that the OP is flawed, that there are indeed ways in which "A trans woman is a woman" is true, but insist...
December 01, 2025 at 23:28
A trivial distinction. To not recognise the smell is to not be able to place it, especially in terms of language. (Added: but moreover, this shows the...
December 01, 2025 at 23:12
A. See , were I show you agreeing with the line of discussion then insisting on the primacy of one definition. B. You seemed to think polysemous meant...
December 01, 2025 at 23:05
Yeah, I wasn't too happy with it either, but it's what is use din the literature when making this point, so I used it too. Go ahead and use your own t...
December 01, 2025 at 22:13
Seems to me that the notion of accessibility does just this. In a world in which p is false, not-p is indeed impossible. That is within the one world....
December 01, 2025 at 22:04
Yes, tot he first paragraph of your reply. If, of course, we look not to meaning but to use, those neural weightings and whatever do stuff with hands ...
December 01, 2025 at 21:54
If the mind computes symbolically, we'd be heading in support of Fodor and Pinker, and we really would have to conclude that all thinking is symbolic,...
December 01, 2025 at 21:50
Furhter, ther eis plenty in @"Hanover"'s OP that is philosophical - conceptual - rather than scientific. The nature of internal thought and language, ...
December 01, 2025 at 21:40
Then since you participated, we need not pay your opinion any attention. :wink: PI §329, in context, does not presume that all thought is linguistic. ...
December 01, 2025 at 21:35
Forcing me to move my reply from here to there. :angry:
December 01, 2025 at 21:18
Look again, with care. That is precisely what it does allow for - the smell is recognised, but the matching word is not: All three, depending on which...
December 01, 2025 at 21:16
The critique of the OP I offered was neatly summed up by @"Jamal". The OP preferenced one definition amongst many. Over a series of posts we saw that ...
December 01, 2025 at 21:10
Oddly irrelevant. It remains for advocates of qualia to explain what qualia add to the conversation that is not already found in our talk of sensation...
December 01, 2025 at 20:58
Quality OP To consider mentalese as a highly compressed language is to accept mentalese. The idea of a private mental language supposedly explains how...
December 01, 2025 at 20:43
Yes, and is the source of Meta's confusion. If we apply Meta's logic to the example I just gave, then because it did not snow last night in Jindabyne,...
December 01, 2025 at 19:57
Your posts are becoming increasingly confused. The “actual world” is not a special kind of world. It is simply this world—the world we inhabit. Every ...
December 01, 2025 at 19:51
Yeah. Nothing in that post deserved a reply. I was going to leave it.
December 01, 2025 at 09:17
Ok, so if "incidental" is too weak, I'd say "constitutive" is too strong.
December 01, 2025 at 05:18
If you insist that only sex counts, then of course only reasons grounded in sex will seem “viable.” But that is a choice of rule—part of how you are c...
December 01, 2025 at 04:56
I think you were saying what I said before: :brow: I fed your whole comment in to ChatGPT, and asked it what the paragraph in question said. So. If th...
December 01, 2025 at 04:13
Sure, all that. But how do qualia help here? I think that they are a red herring... And I think I've made a good fist of showing that they are not wel...
December 01, 2025 at 04:08
You said women don't fight. That's not so. Here it is: That appears to say that there are biological reasons that women do not fight. But women do fig...
December 01, 2025 at 03:54
You've laid bare your own confusion. The actual world is a possible world. The actual world is the one in which we may empirically verify statements a...
December 01, 2025 at 03:51
:rofl: Keep going.
December 01, 2025 at 03:24
Why not? Seems odd to exclude them. But whatever. Churlish. Ok. So maybe back to this: I take it that we've shown some difficulties with this paragrap...
December 01, 2025 at 03:24
Ok, point taken. But it remains that a transgender person may change their physiology. At the very least, provide a link.
December 01, 2025 at 02:41
Sure. But transgender people do change their biology. All transsexual people are transgender. Not all transgender people are transsexual. Transgender ...
December 01, 2025 at 02:24