You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Banno

Comments

Curious, that your thread on a simple technical feature had been metamorphosed into a discussion of the arguments for the existence of god. A sign of ...
December 27, 2022 at 19:56
Hmmm. I read Searle as claiming that the difference between a grunt and an utterance is exactly that the utterance makes use of an institution... it c...
December 27, 2022 at 19:41
Perhaps in English its role is to distinguish Snow White from that snow is white. Again, there are languages in which it doesn't occur; it is not need...
December 27, 2022 at 19:30
"Snow is white" is just a noun and a predicate... f(a). The "is" does nothing. "Snow is whiter than rain" is an order predicate, still be parsed as f(...
December 27, 2022 at 03:42
One of my old profs tells a story of giving a talk in which some young kid tried to ask a question which the prof idly dismissed. One of the others in...
December 26, 2022 at 23:27
Why? It has a use? What does it do? It doesn't even occur in certain other languages, where the concatenation of a predicate and a noun will suffice. ...
December 26, 2022 at 23:21
You are asking what is the "...is..." in S is P? It isn't anything; certainly not a relation. Let's not reify syntax.
December 26, 2022 at 22:43
Reality doesn't care whether you've read Foucault.
December 26, 2022 at 22:10
That certain noises or marks count as utterances, while others do not, shows that language is institutional. Far as Searle's account is from Marx, the...
December 26, 2022 at 22:08
And so to the deconstruction of Russell from p.169. Russell tried to achieve some semblance of certainty by supposing that the only real names were "t...
December 26, 2022 at 21:45
The 1986 remake as the classic? I grieve for my people.
December 26, 2022 at 20:47
My thread. I'm the mahout. I have the cool hat, and a thotti, in a hopeless attempt to keep control.
December 26, 2022 at 20:42
So can you phrase that in terms of boxes and diamonds? And if you can't, do you actually understand it? OR are you sliding along an ambiguity?
December 26, 2022 at 20:36
Sure. The answer, at least for modal issues, is to drop talk of de re and de dicto and use diamonds and boxes and brackets to keep the scope explicit....
December 26, 2022 at 20:24
So to p.167 and the case of proper names. If we substitute a and b for x and y, with a few more brackets to explicate the scope, we have ((a=b) . Fa) ...
December 26, 2022 at 20:22
De re/ de dicto is a distinction with multiple renderings in modal logic. The one I gave above can only be indicative. A better approach is to drop th...
December 26, 2022 at 20:02
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/17/Illustrated_proverb-_Blind_men_and_an_elephant.jpg An ableist slur, of course.
December 26, 2022 at 19:34
Again, I'm not familiar with it, but seems to be about nomenclature.
December 26, 2022 at 03:39
Note 5? Seems to be about the differences in how the formula are to be written rather than anything of direct import. Quine had issues with extensiona...
December 26, 2022 at 02:38
And hence to Russell's solution to the apparent problem of substituting descriptions not argument (1-4). The argument seem to be something like that, ...
December 26, 2022 at 02:11
Much of the next page is concerned with examples of two descriptions of the same individual. Let's look at "the author of Hamlet", "H". This picks out...
December 26, 2022 at 01:39
Hmm. Individuals as in individual constants... a,b,c... and properties of individuals as in fa, fb, ga... Descriptions are presumably formula that pic...
December 26, 2022 at 01:19
No, in Identity and Necessity
December 26, 2022 at 00:46
But we did learn that the star we see in the morning is the same as the star we see in the evening - they are both Venus. So we can learn that two des...
December 26, 2022 at 00:08
, The issue addressed int he article is, how best are we to talk about necessity and identity? The article seeks to sort out the many confusions by lo...
December 25, 2022 at 22:18
For the rest, small steps. I would like to look a the paper with care, rather than moving ahed too quickly, or jumping to Kant or to the mind-body pro...
December 25, 2022 at 22:02
Yeah, it's an important, but fraught, distinction. I suspect focusing on it will cause yet more confusion. It's a distinction that is important becaus...
December 25, 2022 at 21:58
...and so on. "There's a meaning there, but the meaning there doesn't really mean a thing". Russel Morris. When I try to make sense of what you have a...
December 25, 2022 at 20:56
Here's the formal argument from the first pages. (1)\,(x)(y) \\(2)\,(x) \Box (x=x) \\(3)\,(x)(y) (x=y) \supset \\ (4)\,(x)(y) What's posited here is t...
December 24, 2022 at 23:05
https://thephilosophyforum.com/discussion/13822/kripke-identity-and-necessity
December 24, 2022 at 21:41
Meh. I'll start it. Give me a minute.
December 24, 2022 at 21:19
That would compromise his position; mods are supposed to be impartial.
December 24, 2022 at 21:04
Since you refuse to read the Philosophical Investigations, there's not a lot of point in discussing it with you.
December 24, 2022 at 20:50
I think the conversation here shows that such a thread would be so badly misunderstood as to be all but impossible to keep on track. I agree with that...
December 24, 2022 at 20:41
Somewhat circular. If you are asking how you tell if something is red, the answer is that it simply doesn't matter. It's your beetle, use whatever met...
December 24, 2022 at 20:33
, Presumably Joshs is bracketing the next part of the conversation... epoché. But perhaps we ought suspend such judgements...
December 24, 2022 at 20:30
That's pretty much it. Language allows us to construct institutional facts; see the thread on Searle I presented earlier. These institutional facts ar...
December 24, 2022 at 20:27
Meh. What I'm offering is a bowdlerised version of the logical notion of interpretation and satisfaction. of course their definitions are explicit, wh...
December 24, 2022 at 20:13
That doesn't say ostensive definitions are impossible. If you go to the PI, and read §28 and onwards, you might get a different view. Turns out the qu...
December 24, 2022 at 10:00
Citation, if you would.
December 24, 2022 at 07:01
It'll be because you are in Australia. We live ten or more hours in the future. Most of the folk here haven't yet even gotten to Christmas eve, and by...
December 24, 2022 at 00:49
So we are dealing, for now with the "is" of predication. First, it's worth noting that predication applies more broadly than to "judgements of experie...
December 24, 2022 at 00:45
Perhaps, although I don't think so. I agree with much of what you are saying here. We agree that there are rules for language use, and that these rule...
December 23, 2022 at 21:58
Parsing counterfactuals in terms of possible world semantics makes explicit the relation involved in the counterfactual. So parsing ”Banno might have ...
December 23, 2022 at 21:16
Quantum computer treats qubits as wormholes... In January, these folk used a negative energy pulse to open a wormhole.
December 23, 2022 at 20:42
Try
December 23, 2022 at 04:20
This notion of empirical knowledge of possible worlds is... confused. Best way to think of the process is that the facts in a possible world are stipu...
December 23, 2022 at 03:48
:ok:
December 23, 2022 at 03:17
Grice? So that's not uncontroversial. What an author intends by an utterance can vary over time, as that utterance is put to other uses. Can't see how...
December 23, 2022 at 03:14
I don't get Kant, so I'm going by what it says in the text books. I'll try to reply to your previous post soon.
December 23, 2022 at 02:40