You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Banno

Comments

What twaddle.
December 24, 2025 at 22:02
Ok. We need to keep the quantification in line - again, there is a difference between any apple and a particular apple and the apple I didn't eat need...
December 24, 2025 at 21:58
Nice. Such an individual immediately brings about modal collapse, since p??p. What we have is further reason of rejection the notion of essence as res...
December 24, 2025 at 21:50
We need to take care here. Here is a way in to talk about essences that make sense: the essence of some individual is those properties that it has in ...
December 23, 2025 at 22:45
For Plantinga, individuals are identified across worlds by their haecceities, not by their kind membership, a “different apple” in another world isn’t...
December 23, 2025 at 21:32
No. The apple can't be a mere mental state because we are now each talking about the very same apple, and your mental states are not my mental states....
December 23, 2025 at 21:27
I'll have a bit of a bitch about Plantinge awhile we are here. It seems to me that Plantiga takes a way of talking and turns it into a thing. Suppose ...
December 23, 2025 at 20:39
Yep. Yep. We might be clearer about Plantinga’s view. It's not primarily about properties like “being an apple”. It is about individual essences (haec...
December 23, 2025 at 20:10
See how the sentence you keep quoting begins with "Say that...". Why? Here's the whole paragraph: See how the single line you quote is part two of fou...
December 23, 2025 at 19:39
Cheers.
December 23, 2025 at 00:44
Why, when the article we are reading clearly uses the semantic theory, and with good reason, is this even worth mentioning? I prefer pistachio nougat ...
December 23, 2025 at 00:28
:grin: "Anecdotal evidence reliable? One man says 'yes!'"
December 22, 2025 at 23:14
I gave evidence earlier that this is not quite so; it's a relatively recent development, consequent on the development of the modern medical system.
December 22, 2025 at 22:45
I don't know how to reply to that. It's not clear to me where you want to go with what you have said. Correspondence is not a deflationary theory of t...
December 22, 2025 at 22:35
For the read-through, I think we are up to 2.2.3 Actuality and Actualism.
December 22, 2025 at 22:24
This thread was set up specifically to work through the two articles. Look: I've said previously that before we embark on a critique of the implicatio...
December 22, 2025 at 21:13
Sometimes. Ethics is not algorithmic.
December 22, 2025 at 20:52
Well, yes - you'd have to change your mind... :wink: Wouldn't it benefit your organisation to find out why it hasn't attracted anyone, over the last t...
December 22, 2025 at 20:50
It is a classic, straight-forward example of the Medical Model. The Equality Act definition makes disability depend on "an impairment (physical or men...
December 22, 2025 at 20:48
Nuh. I reject your arguments because they are muddled. Take: It contains at least a half-dozen compounding errors. There are infinite sets, and indeed...
December 22, 2025 at 20:11
Indeed, but very clearly what is being used in modal logic is a semantic theory of truth. Well, we can use Kaplan's account, if you like. It's an exte...
December 22, 2025 at 19:49
, , keep in mind that a rigid designator only refers to an individual in those possible worlds in which that individual exists. If Homer didn't exist,...
December 22, 2025 at 19:36
Yep. Bullshit.
December 22, 2025 at 10:44
And the one being used in the article is Tarski’s Truth Definition.
December 22, 2025 at 10:24
It's good - it brought out another aspect into my response to the article. The SEP article presumes maximally complete worlds, but the logical work th...
December 22, 2025 at 08:31
What, exactly, is not possible? Have you an argument to go along with that? And what of it - we are using Tarski's semantics, not correspondence. I pr...
December 22, 2025 at 07:16
The word "learning" is problematic. It'd be better to say "the causal chain is a chain of people using the name to refer to Aristotle correctly. “Lear...
December 22, 2025 at 07:06
Yep. Yes, I think so. The point - lost on some - is that the logic is much the same. That'd just make yet another possible world, with some characters...
December 22, 2025 at 07:02
In: Bannings  — view comment
Yep. Jamal was very generous with giving Bob enough rope. The result was inevitable.
December 21, 2025 at 23:58
In: Bannings  — view comment
While what you say is mostly correct, his views were in the end small and nasty.
December 21, 2025 at 22:06
No! What you learned is irrelevant. You heard someone use the word Aristotle, and you started to use the word; and crucially, you would be talking abo...
December 21, 2025 at 21:58
Yep - treating it as a possible world, and truth as true-in-a-world. "unqualified" is problematic; we can take this world, the one we are in, to be w?...
December 21, 2025 at 21:51
I don't think so, but I'm not sure... The idea is somewhat ill-formed, but it's related to the idea that some differences make no difference. I need t...
December 21, 2025 at 21:40
You pretend your already repudiated arguments were adequate. They are not.
December 21, 2025 at 21:29
This rather depends on how one understands "determinism". Determinism is a thesis about law-governed evolution within a world, not about the space of ...
December 21, 2025 at 21:25
That's the role of w?. You answered your own question, I think. I've again got "A nice derangement of epitaphs" in the back of my mind here. A referen...
December 21, 2025 at 21:21
Given that one in six folk have a disability, your organisation might do well to reconsider it's clientele and hiring strategy. Or is your accessible ...
December 21, 2025 at 21:11
In: Bannings  — view comment
While what you say might be so, it remains that the common thread in Bob's justification of racism, homophobia and transphobia was a form essentialism...
December 21, 2025 at 20:54
As you wish. On the account given here we make sense of existence within worlds. Frodo is a Hobbit - h(a). By existential generalisation there is some...
December 21, 2025 at 05:37
The logic itself is (almost) metaphysically neutral. The concrete approach is one interpretation among many. And the answers to your questions will de...
December 21, 2025 at 05:11
You are babbling. Kripke showed how give truth conditions for modal claims using Tarski's semantics.
December 21, 2025 at 05:01
See the Island Universe for a related reflection.
December 21, 2025 at 01:14
Yep.
December 20, 2025 at 23:13
This thread reeks of Americans being surprised that their values are not universal.
December 20, 2025 at 22:27
Yep. Nice. It's a neat point to put pressure on. The simple answer is that the possible worlds are in w?, the actual world. But all this means is that...
December 20, 2025 at 22:07
@"frank" One last word on intensionality for Abstractionism, concerning that paragraph about methodology. We saw earlier how speaking roughly, the int...
December 20, 2025 at 22:01
@"frank", it's clear and got lost somewhere. I'm not going back for Meta, who will double down and object to whatever is suggested. Relativist might c...
December 20, 2025 at 21:08
Again, that's explained in AW1. But you claim to have read and understood that... :roll: How can you expect to be taken seriously?
December 20, 2025 at 21:04
I'd sugest you go back and read that section.
December 20, 2025 at 21:00
No allusion. I was quite specific. Yep. I've pointed this out, several times. see for example
December 20, 2025 at 20:57