Come on, Bob. Yes, a foetus is not a cyst. A blastocyst is a cyst. The embryo develops in part of the blastocyst. It is considered a foetus from 8 to ...
Yep. Also Dobbs. v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization. Implied rights are not so firm, as recent history demonstrates: If it where as you claim, it ...
PhilPapers 2020 asked Quite overwhelmingly, professional philosophers are in favour of abortion on demand in the first trimester. And again, god is in...
Dear Hanover, nor do I. What is despicable is forcing others to conform to what folk think their invisible friend wants. By all means, may 'merca have...
Sure. The mother carries the child, and so has the greater part. The father can play their part by convincing the mother that they will provide suffic...
To be sure, it is with good reason! The capabilities approach has a stronger and broader notion of personhood. It incorporates the social model of dis...
Yes, another thread; unfortunately even naming him in some circles, in which his arguments would be beneficial, will finish conversations. He is perso...
It's a good argument, but unfortunately Singer mucked his credentials with some rubbish about disability. The capabilities approach strikes me as an i...
I don't need to. Have a look down the page from Pew Research linked above. Opposition to abortion is overwhelmingly from white evangelical protestant ...
I didn't deny their feelings, just their excuse. What they think their invisible friend says is no justification for forcing their view on others. If ...
Tough. What folk think their invisible friend says is no basis for moral choice. You seem to be having trouble with the fact that the foetus develops ...
Go over it again, if you will. "Murder" is a legal term. Folk who think abortion is murder, despite it not being so on the state legal code, perhaps m...
All that may be so, and yet it remain useful to sometimes separate what a sentence is about from what one is doing with it. To be sure, it is a mistak...
I'm asking you to apply Moore's open question to your definition of "good". It's a meta ethical request. I suspect that you realise the problem, and t...
No! That's not what it says. Rather, concepts are what we do. The difference is central. Concepts are not things! Treat this as an example in which th...
I'm not. I'm wondering about your thinking on the topic, and how it relates to It is clear Wittgenstein is rejecting any notion of treating words as j...
Well, isn't it good to have all that finished with, then? Now we can move on to more fundamental things, such as why 'mercans say "cookie" when they m...
But "And the question will then arise whether we are still willing to use the concept of 'calculating in the head' here—or whether in such circumstanc...
So concepts have "internal" and "external" aspects? We might leave aside for now how it is possible to talk about these "internal" aspects, and suppos...
Consider the concept blue, the concept democracy, and the concept of cycling. What do these have in common such that we can call them all concepts? Th...
So what is good is to survive, to live, to thrive? Can you think of something that enables you to survive, and yet that is not good? Something that en...
Comments