You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

180 Proof

Comments

:up: :100:
April 16, 2021 at 02:25
:100:
April 16, 2021 at 02:22
I've only posted once to engage and twice more to "remind" him so. I ain't one of Barftrix's feeders any more than you are, DJ.
April 16, 2021 at 02:19
I've pissed right on Barftrix's fatuous, fallacious, OP https://thephilosophyforum.com/discussion/comment/521348 and yet 5 pages on this overfed (D-K)...
April 16, 2021 at 02:05
:up: :lol: "Socialism for the rich, rugged-individualism for everyone else." ~MLK, Jr
April 15, 2021 at 23:11
Economic democracy (i.e. libertarian socialism ... syndical anarchism, etc), simply put, renders obsolete such (early) 19th century (& "Cold War") shi...
April 15, 2021 at 23:00
Yeah, reminiscences from the '80s that wouldn't let me sleep off my buzz last weekend. Between day hikes (flâneurie), my exorcist recommends ... Bartó...
April 15, 2021 at 21:13
You still got those ol' pandemic blues? :mask: Eff 'em! :fire: https://youtu.be/MN9YLLQl7gE :strong: "Easy Sleazy" (3:46) Mick Jagger (77 wtf?!) & Dav...
April 15, 2021 at 20:52
:up:
April 15, 2021 at 15:35
"Human activity has brought my kind to the brink of extinction, but I don’t blame them for it. They didn’t do it maliciously. They just weren’t paying...
April 15, 2021 at 14:55
:up:
April 15, 2021 at 14:54
Yeah, precisely: immorbidity rather than "immortality". :up: Done. Give me the pill! :death: :flower:
April 15, 2021 at 14:49
I've not stated what I "believe" about consciousness so this statement is, at best, unwarranted. I've studied Spinoza's writings for decades and that ...
April 15, 2021 at 13:29
Science informs (constrains-enables) philosophy, etc. Philosophy interprets (problematizes) science, etc. At best, through reflective equilibrium, sci...
April 14, 2021 at 23:48
:up: Almost all of what there is is 'bodies-without-minds' (though no minds-without-bodies) in so far as we're talking about individuals, but you're r...
April 14, 2021 at 22:19
I see it as one coin, two faces .. like a diamond with many facets or a terrain with many paths / maps ... (re: Complementarity, plurality, irreality ...
April 14, 2021 at 22:01
:up: Like a photon that can be described as either a wave or a particle, thus conceived of as 'wave-particle (implicate-explicate?) physicalism'. I pr...
April 14, 2021 at 21:48
More or less, not precisely, correct over all; but #4 & #5 are completely correct.
April 14, 2021 at 21:27
Well, then, you're asking the wrong person if it's information you need for reaching a conclusion about Spinozism. You need to study Spinoza's work wi...
April 14, 2021 at 14:04
A. Most likely. B. Unfortunately so. But think of the thousands of human generations in need of antibiotics before they had been discovered ... C. Oka...
April 14, 2021 at 13:56
Yes. Logic is everything, or all there is. Whatever is "illogical" only seems so due to what Spinoza calls our "inadequate ideas" or "imagination" (i....
April 14, 2021 at 13:35
I understand you. The human brain is still very much terra incognita, which is all the more reason to study it in all its astronomical complexity than...
April 14, 2021 at 12:39
Yes, Bohm's work makes sense. And no neuroscience isn't by definition or entirely reductive; but even if it is, the proof of the pudding is in the eat...
April 14, 2021 at 12:06
I've always associated Bohm's implicate order with Spinoza's natura naturans (substance) once I'd thoroughly studied the Ethics.
April 14, 2021 at 08:02
Only thing better than my posts for you, lil D-K, would be the meds you're not taking. :smirk:
April 14, 2021 at 04:30
:up:
April 14, 2021 at 01:42
Stoooopid OP ... and in too many ways to bother enumerating. Good job, lil D-K. :up: (Time to take your meds now.)
April 14, 2021 at 01:37
I've a sneaking suspicion (bordering on paranoia) that some machines have passed the Turing Test already, maybe decades ago, and that they're smart en...
April 14, 2021 at 01:24
In: Pantheism  — view comment
Nothing, as far as I can tell, in so far as nature (plus "divinity-providence") is indistinguishable from nature (minus "divinity-providence"). My per...
April 14, 2021 at 01:21
Thanks. I've been following his work since his Francis Crick days and more recently with both Guilio Tononi & The Allen Institute For Brain Science. L...
April 14, 2021 at 00:39
I find it interesting but I'm not a proponent per se. The objections are as compelling as Tononi's approach.
April 14, 2021 at 00:29
Well, okay, if that's all you got. Just checking. Full disclosure: I don't much care for Tegmark's "mathematical universe" for philosophical rather th...
April 14, 2021 at 00:17
Have you read Tegmark's MU conjecture? I'm interested in your objections or, even better, a plausible refutation. The expansion of the universe was al...
April 13, 2021 at 23:44
Mostly I agree except when it comes to the natural sciences and technology. Newer is better because it builds on and incorporates what's come before. ...
April 13, 2021 at 21:00
Okay, well then stick with popular science written this millennium for the most up-to-date science and speculations. :wink:
April 13, 2021 at 20:27
So by "mysteries" you mean all of those, for want of a better term, kinds? If so, your OP is too vague or senseless. I guess me not being a "Jungian" ...
April 13, 2021 at 20:25
Epistemologically the "interaction" is pov/language-variant (e.g. poetry) or pov/language-invariant (e.g. gravity)?
April 13, 2021 at 20:11
I'd stick with reading Bohm & other serious physicists who publically speculate (stray into metaphysics) like Deutsch, Tegmark, Stenger or Rovelli and...
April 13, 2021 at 20:07
I wonder: is the "subject-object interaction" subjective or objective?
April 13, 2021 at 19:56
... by which you mean • unanswerable questions? (conceptual) • unsolvable problems? (epistemological) • inexplicable, incomprehensible, ineffable, bey...
April 13, 2021 at 19:49
So the questions and/or their answers are controversial. Apparently, whether or not the earth is flat is 'popularly' controversial too. Big whup. The ...
April 13, 2021 at 19:07
Explain what you mean by "mysteries". I, for one, don't find any of them "essential" (though, yes of course, they're perennially recurring topics). Wh...
April 13, 2021 at 17:48
Agreed. Like philosophy, in which we love – seek – wisdom, we seek goodness even though its a horizon we can never reach. After all, morals are not ne...
April 13, 2021 at 17:07
So what? For most of human history people didn't "usually think and act" like 'the Earth is round' or 'diseases are caused by germs' or 'marital rape ...
April 13, 2021 at 16:49
Yes. I need to revisit her work soon (just took the book off the shelf and put it on "the pile").
April 13, 2021 at 16:35
Parenting. Elder care. Child adoption. Donating blood or organs. Solidarity (civil disobedience / mass protests) for social justice. Speaking truth to...
April 13, 2021 at 16:32
Good. Her idea is simple and profound and I've applied it to my own concerns. And yet, by no means am I a (neo)Platonist like Ms. Murdoch; some of her...
April 13, 2021 at 09:15
Yeah, there are other approaches. Speaking for myself, self-care via non-reciprocal caring for others (the devil is certainly in the details) is also ...
April 13, 2021 at 08:56
:up: I recommend her much more concise Platonic work The Sovereignty of Good.
April 13, 2021 at 08:33