You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

180 Proof

Comments

In: Emergence  — view comment
Nevermind. :roll: The usual non sequiturs. :sweat:
February 28, 2023 at 12:00
In: Emergence  — view comment
You didn't answer my first question (you must have missed it). Again – in response to your comment about AI – only life can be aware? (How do you know...
February 28, 2023 at 10:34
In: Emergence  — view comment
Only life can be aware? How do you know this?
February 28, 2023 at 07:41
Copelston's summary of Spinoza, like most other summaries in his A History of Philosophy, is both outdated and shoe-horned into a permissible, Jesuiti...
February 28, 2023 at 07:01
:smirk:
February 28, 2023 at 06:39
"Naive realism", however, isn't philosophical realism, which is what I read into the OP poll's "non-skeptical realism". Nonetheless, javra, I take you...
February 28, 2023 at 05:32
"How can you explain ..." https://youtu.be/6B4PZHSTHLE "Shadows in the Rain" (5:04) Zenyatta Mondatta, 1980 The Police
February 28, 2023 at 05:18
No e.g. Descartes, Hegel, Nietzsche et al.
February 28, 2023 at 01:57
Like Covid-19, "just stop testing" to get rid of it. :mask:
February 28, 2023 at 01:49
Isn't antirealism a form of idealism? Are there other forms of idealism which are not antirealist?
February 28, 2023 at 01:43
:up: :clap: :100: Yep, "white flight" is as baseball & apple pie as "In God We Trust" on Caesar's filthy lucre – old-time "heartland" stuff. I suspect...
February 28, 2023 at 00:03
Cartesian dualism is more compatible with Christian theology (even Catholic trinitarianism) than Spinozist acosmism which is why Descartes' confusions...
February 27, 2023 at 23:41
In: Emergence  — view comment
:cool:
February 27, 2023 at 23:24
:100: :up:
February 27, 2023 at 23:23
In: Emergence  — view comment
If only @"Gnomon" & co could (i.e. would make the effort to) understand and appreciate the soundly speculative implications of contemporary sciences s...
February 27, 2023 at 10:03
Descartes proposes substance dualism and Spinoza a few of decades later countered with, for all intents and purposes, property dualism. Remember: Spin...
February 27, 2023 at 09:41
Thanks for the reference to T.Z. Lavine https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thelma_Z._Lavine – this wiki is fascinating, I'd never heard of her – but the ...
February 27, 2023 at 08:06
https://m.youtube.com/playlist?list=OLAK5uy_lq26YClxHOBogwoV-LRHDntDFzeeWOiSk Your Mother Should Know (48:38), 2023 Brad Mehldau
February 27, 2023 at 07:33
Patience. Persistence. Creativity. Courage. (And not necessarily in that order.) :chin:
February 26, 2023 at 22:45
:cool:
February 26, 2023 at 22:42
Bernard Gert's moral theory seems quite consiliant, or convergent, with my own musings though our respective approaches (emphases) couldn't be more di...
February 26, 2023 at 22:34
Just a guess – it might have something to do with 'Gödel's proof of incompleteness from self-referential complexity' (Seth Lloyd, Douglas Hofstadter)....
February 26, 2023 at 22:16
Guilty as charged. I usually barely skim posts with quotes attributed to or artcles about men or women I've never heard of such as Prof. Gert. The vid...
February 26, 2023 at 21:56
I suppose "Dilbert" is now bad for business. 'Bottom-line cancel culture' in full effect is on display. Predictable. Like 'suicide by mod' here on TPF...
February 26, 2023 at 21:25
Thanks. :up:
February 26, 2023 at 21:03
:up: Just like breathing ...
February 26, 2023 at 05:18
Yeah, P.W. Zapffe is one of my favorites listed on my TPF profile. :death: :flower:
February 26, 2023 at 04:48
Thanks. I'll check it out.
February 26, 2023 at 03:30
February 26, 2023 at 03:06
:clap: :up: :100: :fire: Excellent.
February 26, 2023 at 02:36
@"schopenhauer1" No doubt we're counterfactual (talking) animals.
February 26, 2023 at 01:09
No doubt you are, Gnomon, a verifiably expert pseudo-scientist. :lol: If you would be so kind, @"universeness", check these questions (which Gnomon is...
February 25, 2023 at 22:27
I've no idea what you're talking about.
February 25, 2023 at 21:33
In: Emergence  — view comment
Post-posthuman (i.e. post-sentient). I didn't think much of either book or film. IMO, the latter is quite dated and superficially derivative. They cer...
February 25, 2023 at 12:53
:up: This statement is quite incoherent, because the phrase "rational sentient creatures" presupposes – makes sense IFF there is – the universe that b...
February 25, 2023 at 10:33
:fire: :100: :up: :up:
February 25, 2023 at 07:35
:roll: What "hypothesis"? Metaphysical naturalism consists of categorica, not hypthetical, statements. Clearly, you still don't understand metaphysics...
February 25, 2023 at 06:01
Yeah, but the fucker hasn't beat me down yet. :wink:
February 25, 2023 at 05:48
Same here, except I see metaphysical speculations as criteria for eliminating – filtering-out – impossible objects / worlds (i.e. necessary fictions) ...
February 25, 2023 at 05:39
Every animal is more than just an "animal". Don't be speciesist :smirk:
February 25, 2023 at 05:06
:death: :flower: I fear death and use that fear to live the best life I can every day so that nightly I can fall asleep at ease without needing any as...
February 25, 2023 at 04:56
If by "existential" you mean reality-denying, I agree with you.
February 25, 2023 at 04:01
In: Emergence  — view comment
You've invoked "Moore's Law"; well, in a similiar vein, the miniaturization of tech, like natural complexity (i.e. life), accelerates ... and I think ...
February 25, 2023 at 02:33
In his Ethics, Spinoza demonstrates that "substance dualism" is conceptually incoherent. He argues for what I have many times referred to as property ...
February 24, 2023 at 22:26
:up: "Looking for certainty" —> illusion of control (e.g. conspiracy / magical thinking).
February 24, 2023 at 21:52
Variations on the god-of-the-gaps theme: deism is "theism minus answering prayers" or theism is "deism plus answering prayers" – theological interpret...
February 24, 2023 at 21:37
I don't undrrstand the question. It seems you've mixed different points I've made from a number of our exchanges.
February 24, 2023 at 21:19
I have to disagree. At the very least, "materialism" is a far more useful epistemological paradigm than any version of "immaterialism" for learning ab...
February 24, 2023 at 04:40