You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

mcdoodle

Comments

Anisotropy is a beautiful word. On the BBC, one commentator was explaining during a lull in the Masters' golf coverage how the powers-that-be at Augus...
April 10, 2017 at 21:29
Truth may be the result of evaluation, but back at logic, that would be quite different from validity. One can make a valid argument and end with up w...
April 10, 2017 at 21:11
Back at the opening theme...in fact tailor-made for you, Question... People often forget that Ludwig Wittgenstein was once one of the richest people i...
April 10, 2017 at 21:07
Here's their latest trick: they claim to have shown you're more productive if you work less hours. What kind of an example is that to set to the rest ...
April 10, 2017 at 21:03
Well, I was trying to understand what Simmel meant. I thought you were trying to contradict him without greatly caring what he meant. After all, he wr...
April 10, 2017 at 18:14
And yet even then the USA road fatality rate is more than three times worse than the UK. Or Sweden, which always wins in social democratic contests :)...
April 10, 2017 at 18:10
Yep, meaning is use :)
April 10, 2017 at 18:04
This summarises what seems to be Simmel's argument well: valuation is a naturally-occurring phenomenon. And yet our talk about it seems transcendent. ...
April 10, 2017 at 11:10
Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar.
April 10, 2017 at 10:49
I'm definitely seeking after wisdom, of which 'the truth' may or may not form an important part. On the Uni course I'm currently on I attended a lectu...
April 10, 2017 at 10:46
Andrew, I was only the other day thinking the very same. Of course the notion has been taken up by logicians, who would require any given world to be ...
April 10, 2017 at 10:35
In: Socialism  — view comment
I was talking to you, Ernest. I have read some of your website, and the breadth of your reading is amazing, but I am well-versed in this corner of lea...
April 08, 2017 at 19:14
In: Socialism  — view comment
Some of us are socialists, and are likely to take umbrage at this. We have been lumbered with accusations about 'Marxism' all our lives. Well, we sold...
April 08, 2017 at 17:54
Pardon me butting in - I like the 'genres'. I'm interested in taking from Bakhtin the notion of speech genres and applying them in the philosophy of l...
April 05, 2017 at 15:48
Thanks for amplifying what you mean. My memory of Sartre is that he isn't as minimalist as this, but the core is, I suppose, as you say it. My memory ...
April 05, 2017 at 15:36
Well, I shall doodle. My lifetime is the age in which individualism has become enshrined in various 'universal human rights', so I can't say I feel fi...
April 05, 2017 at 15:16
Just remind me where Sartre says something like this, would you?
April 04, 2017 at 21:41
There is an organisation called 'Muslims for Progressive Values: http://www.mpvusa.org. They make very clear statements against child marriage, fgm an...
April 02, 2017 at 12:30
I don't think our knowledge of Greek and Roman sculpture and architecture, for instance, bears this out. In Greece, in quite a short period the favour...
April 02, 2017 at 11:37
There seem to be some humans following the same line of 'modal collapse'. Here's a paper by a guy called Kraay arguing that theists should embrace mod...
March 30, 2017 at 21:25
You're assuming he didn't later do a spectacular fly-past.
March 30, 2017 at 21:11
My understanding would be that there is an assumed ground for understanding the history of thought beyond the rules of logic and grammar and beneath c...
March 30, 2017 at 21:10
You write about presuppositions and here to my mind is one of yours. These three rules are about formal language. They aren't about ordinary language....
March 30, 2017 at 16:43
I've been a professional writer most of my working life and pride myself on my clarity. Nevertheless I think there's something to be said for Barthes'...
March 29, 2017 at 21:52
I suppose all work about the facts of other people's lives is exploitative, but this one does look, well, exploitative, in the context of an artist wh...
March 29, 2017 at 17:45
One old definition would be the collective ownership of the means of production, distribution and exchange. While there are a zillion interpretations ...
March 29, 2017 at 17:27
Educated feelings are as good a guide to right action as any other. Reasoning is always built on premises: where are the premises for moral action to ...
March 28, 2017 at 21:25
One difficulty for this line of argument is that from 1930 to 1970, say, some of which were the days of my youth, it was in atheist countries where by...
March 28, 2017 at 21:19
It's a thing of beauty. I ate of the fruit.
March 28, 2017 at 20:53
Well I am hoping to read some Bouveresse anyway, about language, though not in the near future as I have a reading list a mile long. What people have ...
March 27, 2017 at 10:49
Yes, I'm against that too. You keep asking rhetorical questions as if they were somehow responses to what I write. I'm very happy to have a debate, bu...
March 27, 2017 at 10:47
I don't understand what you're saying here. Most Muslims are moderate people, just like the rest of us. Perhaps you mean that there aren't prominent M...
March 27, 2017 at 10:35
Muslims make up a little under 15% of prisoners overall. Most of them are in jail for ordinary crimes. It's a puzzle, but it seems more likely to be c...
March 27, 2017 at 10:26
The Janus principle. I'm reading about 'mood' which I'm writing about. Oddly enough this very issue comes up there; I suppose it comes up everywhere s...
March 27, 2017 at 09:55
To recap. I'm against vague blanket criticism of some body of work called 'postmodernism'. I've stood up for Foucault and partly justified that by rem...
March 27, 2017 at 09:39
In: Certainty  — view comment
Like lots of these questions, to me certainty depends on who wants to know and why. In that sense, propositional certainty just has degrees. Are you c...
March 26, 2017 at 19:16
The Stanford entry on neutral monism suggests that, rather, his was double-aspect monism, and that's how I understand it. (Stanford entry)
March 26, 2017 at 19:09
You juxtaposed this to my remark that analytic philosophy is largely blind to the workings of power. I'm not clear what point you're making. Philosoph...
March 26, 2017 at 18:58
I think the Wittgenstein answer would start here. Is to say that 'everyone is bad at philosophy' meaningful? How is it meaningful? To what or whom are...
March 25, 2017 at 21:25
I'm glad the conversation has shifted to an actual writer. What you say, jkop, sounds quite like what a lot of students and teachers of analytic philo...
March 25, 2017 at 10:19
Someone should send for Banno and ask him to argue for Davidson's view: Here is Davidson's paper: On the very idea of a conceptual scheme. His argumen...
March 24, 2017 at 22:54
Thanks un that's a thought-provoking piece. I've said I'm on a uni course. Last year I proposed an essay based on some wacky ideas about language. My ...
March 24, 2017 at 22:23
Well, that was 20 years ago, and quite a lot of ink has been spilt over it. Of course the Sokal hoax was brilliant. Still, I thought there was nothing...
March 22, 2017 at 22:55
My point is that the op and others also have such access. In a philosophy forum I would like to see specific remarks quoted and debated. That's the in...
March 22, 2017 at 22:37
But my earlier point is, people are often saying this sort of thing, but not citing the apparent purveyors of it. Who are these postmodern 'thinkers'?...
March 22, 2017 at 22:22
This is quite a common view on this and the old pf forum. An odd thing is, the assertion is rarely backed up by an actual quote from an actual post-mo...
March 22, 2017 at 10:20
Like jkop I feel there's nothing to doubt about my personal experience. It happens...it happened. As soon as it's in the past some doubt can reasonabl...
March 22, 2017 at 10:05
I know you're interested in this interpretation of final cause, and I'm interested in different ways of understand the four aitia or causes, but I can...
March 21, 2017 at 00:18
I know this is a bit of a side road, but...I don't recognize Aristotle in this. The contemplation of the one comes later, surely, with Plotinus. Arist...
March 21, 2017 at 00:13
The claims of philosophy of language, which I think needs a complete revamp.
March 20, 2017 at 23:54