You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Thorongil

Comments

No he doesn't. He rejects only a certain type of theism, in contradistinction to the one he advocates, which is remarkably akin to classical conceptio...
October 06, 2017 at 23:45
Why do you assume that I have one? I'm not a theist at present, but I don't have to be to identify bad arguments against God's existence.
October 06, 2017 at 23:34
A non-sequitur. God being invisible or immaterial doesn't entail that he cannot be proven to exist.
October 06, 2017 at 23:26
I don't know. It's not really my problem. Really? All of those figures use the particular word "God" to refer to "a range of possible realities?" I do...
October 06, 2017 at 23:24
Maybe. But then you'd need an argument to show that, which I don't see here.
October 06, 2017 at 23:15
So? Citing one exception merely proves the rule. What you think is irrelevant. Your feelings aren't the standard by which words are defined. No, this ...
October 06, 2017 at 23:12
I do, though. It's just we're not really discussing it, and I don't understand the desire to avoid actually having an argument. I say let's have one, ...
October 06, 2017 at 23:05
No, you're just redefining God to what it hasn't and doesn't normatively refer to.
October 06, 2017 at 21:47
I don't know what this means. But let me take a stab at it. The first part about an "ethical credo" might mean that you don't think anti-natalism is a...
October 06, 2017 at 21:44
Why not?
October 06, 2017 at 20:45
I think so, yes.
October 06, 2017 at 16:10
https://cdn.thisiswhyimbroke.com/images/flamethrower-640x533.jpg
October 06, 2017 at 15:47
This question needs to be addressed first, because if God does exist, then there must be an explanation for evil, whether we know what that is or not....
October 06, 2017 at 15:38
The whole point of his argument, as I see it, is that this result is best achieved by the people who agree with this statement having children. Otherw...
October 06, 2017 at 15:22
You could become a pescatarian like me, although I'm slowly moving in the direction of veganism. I agree that it's better to mind not the times but th...
October 05, 2017 at 20:24
I wouldn't put it past him, given many previous interactions with him.
October 05, 2017 at 20:21
Correct. There are actually several arguments in favor of anti-natalism, and I would classify them into three categories: those from hedonic asymmetry...
October 05, 2017 at 20:20
It's clearly not off limits. We're discussing it here and now, while Benatar and others have published books and articles on it in the academy. My con...
October 05, 2017 at 20:04
He will just respond by saying that creating human life and continuing to live once alive are separate issues. He will say that suicide is difficult t...
October 05, 2017 at 19:27
I myself find hunting a morally dubious activity, unless it's the primary means of one's survival, which obviously doesn't apply to most people living...
October 05, 2017 at 19:23
Translation: "I have good sense, and you're an idiot if you don't agree with my ideas."
October 05, 2017 at 18:37
Here's a case in point:
October 05, 2017 at 15:28
No it's not. That's why Person A doesn't say it. Person A isn't necessarily opposed to regulating guns. He may be opposed to the kinds of regulations ...
October 05, 2017 at 15:20
If you're a Benthamite who denies the existence of natural rights, then I can see why you would think it would be easy to repeal the second amendment....
October 05, 2017 at 15:14
Bombing the venue could have done the job. So could ramming a truck into the crowd. But as for melee weapons, a man in Japan recently stabbed 19 peopl...
October 05, 2017 at 14:55
The samsaric nature of this "debate" in a nutshell: Person A: I don't think more gun control would have stopped the recent mass shooting. A person int...
October 05, 2017 at 14:41
Asking such questions in an apparently rhetorical manner is itself the insinuation.
October 04, 2017 at 23:23
The projection in this comment is staggering.
October 04, 2017 at 23:21
Don't shift this onto me! This is precisely what I was asking you!
October 04, 2017 at 23:17
You're still being overly emotional.
October 04, 2017 at 20:08
And you were informed via PM, I presume? I hear that's where all the truth comes from these days.
October 04, 2017 at 19:27
Why would she prefer to enable evil people to carry out evil deeds? What a vile thing to insinuate.
October 04, 2017 at 19:25
Nice declarative statement.
October 04, 2017 at 19:22
And if they claim to have good reasons for believing that it is, what then? How are we to know that they're not? Or it could not be. Making these appa...
October 04, 2017 at 19:08
Funny you mention this now. :-d
October 04, 2017 at 18:59
;)
October 04, 2017 at 18:53
It's funny watching you shift the semantics, as we've now gone from proof to mere suggestion.
October 04, 2017 at 18:48
That makes zero difference: Now I know how I'm being clear: just PM someone, and if they agree that I am, I am! Who knew it was so simple?
October 04, 2017 at 18:42
Now I know how to win an argument: just PM someone, and if they agree with me, I've won! Who knew it was so simple?
October 04, 2017 at 18:34
Wow, such irrefutable proof.
October 04, 2017 at 18:32
I'm disappointed you've chosen to play dumb. You very clearly gave a disanalogy. If you don't see it, then I can't help you. Paddock clearly intended ...
October 04, 2017 at 18:26
This is rich. You accuse people of creating straw men and yet proceed to do just that in the quote above. Most drunk drivers don't intent to murder pe...
October 04, 2017 at 17:32
Okay, now I'm curious. For what reason do you want to solely talk about mass shootings? I want to give you the chance to explain why, because your rea...
October 04, 2017 at 17:03
Apparently, Australia is a veritable Garden of Eden. But look at this chart and filter for the most recent date: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of...
October 04, 2017 at 16:51
Yes, my position is that mass murder cannot ever be "solved," so long as human beings exist. I have already agreed with you that there are certain mea...
October 04, 2017 at 16:30
I think the Paddock case is unique though. There were absolutely no visible or documented warning signs, such that I doubt any law or regulation would...
October 04, 2017 at 03:49
It sounded like a policy recommendation to me, which, again, I'm fine with.
October 04, 2017 at 02:55
Hey, I agreed with your earlier proposal, didn't I? Who are you talking to?
October 04, 2017 at 02:46
"Only" is still false.
October 03, 2017 at 21:20
That's not funny, because it isn't true. Mass shootings have occurred all over the world, unfortunately.
October 03, 2017 at 18:09