You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Agustino

Comments

You're muddling up matters and confusing different concepts. Do you intend to communicate by typing on a keyboard? If you do, then why do you intend t...
January 09, 2017 at 10:19
You type on a keyboard because you want to communicate, and you want to communicate because you see it as good no? Sure. That's not a judgement but th...
January 09, 2017 at 00:53
Yes. For something to be aimed towards something else does not require that this act is intentional. For example, for Aristotle, the final cause of a ...
January 09, 2017 at 00:28
Not "strictly" deterministic. He qualifies the statement, and that's because he has a spiritual axe to grind. De Broglie did qualify it as causal and ...
January 09, 2017 at 00:01
I've read it, but just as I expected, it's the kind of drivel that you can only find in the New York Times and other such sources for "popularisation"...
January 08, 2017 at 23:53
There's also Pilot Wave theory which removes the non-determinism and collapse issue, but at the cost of non-locality. The theory is quite simple in th...
January 08, 2017 at 23:33
So how did you get to know what 2 means? Yeah, and we could make alternative orders, only that they're not so useful at describing our reality.
January 08, 2017 at 23:05
What's the QM problem? Why is it a problem that the result is indeterministic (better said probabilistic)? And no I don't think that approach is valid...
January 08, 2017 at 22:42
1+1=2 isn't a relation, it's a description of a relation. Counting is an empirical matter. It's only in our world that we count 1, 2, etc. We learn to...
January 08, 2017 at 22:39
I agree with you. But I'm asking the question to BC, apparently he thinks it can be discrete, and if it's discrete, it's somehow less morally wrong th...
January 08, 2017 at 22:26
How can it be discrete if there's always the possibility that the other party will find out? :s It seems to me whoever thinks it can be discrete is de...
January 08, 2017 at 21:57
I think there's a difference between folks having sex, and us having a culture that's about sex, as we do today. Sex didn't use to be a source of self...
January 08, 2017 at 20:46
I noted the lack of interesting discussion on their boards. Philosophers seem to be rarely, if ever mentioned there, which I did find very strange. Yo...
January 08, 2017 at 20:42
It's not only a PR move - you have to be socially liberal to be in line with modern culture - it's good for business, you'll get more people being wil...
January 08, 2017 at 20:38
Most Jews in the US, or most Jews in Israel? Because in the US most Jews lean liberal, but they aren't really Orthodox either - they're actually secul...
January 08, 2017 at 20:34
In addition, for all those who have never worked in research in a scientific evidence based field (notice I didn't say philosophical), I think knowled...
January 08, 2017 at 20:19
I saw you around at Philosophy Now, you're quite a star there :P - I haven't even made an appearance there, though I do have an account, but can't be ...
January 08, 2017 at 19:19
But the relations are certainly not invented. Certainly the way we add things, and the number system we use, and so forth - they're invented. But the ...
January 08, 2017 at 19:13
In: Hello!  — view comment
Hello Maw! Welcome! :)
January 08, 2017 at 19:08
>:O I've never seen that occur here, though it sometimes happened at PF. The only possibility for that, to be honest, would be spam-bots. No person wo...
January 08, 2017 at 18:54
Flooding? What's that?
January 08, 2017 at 18:46
https://aeon.co/essays/could-we-explain-the-world-without-cause-and-effect
January 08, 2017 at 17:31
Which things don't you do because you think them good? Again, this doesn't disprove my point. Even if I'd rather please my penis (he said it!) than li...
January 08, 2017 at 16:20
Fine, if those are the rules, they are the rules.
January 08, 2017 at 15:57
>:O
January 08, 2017 at 15:56
Fine, I don't mind doing that. The only issue is that the point remains quite abstract, whereas being vulgar not only points to it but shows it.
January 08, 2017 at 15:10
But what if their position implies vulgarity? It sounds vulgar to me, and so I'm merely illustrating that. Why is illustrating the vulgarity inherent ...
January 08, 2017 at 14:48
My posts have actually been moderated before as far as I remember, and I have no problems with it mostly (in fact I don't remember ever complaining be...
January 08, 2017 at 12:58
It was part of the very same conversation actually, check the messages. It was the continuation of it. At my request? You're talking as if I am your b...
January 08, 2017 at 12:47
Well clearly a post which says global warming is happening because the Earth is getting closer to the Sun because of the Sun's gravity is bullshit - b...
January 08, 2017 at 12:31
Below are my arguments that have never been addressed, or have been improperly addressed (although many of them have in fact never been replied to eve...
January 08, 2017 at 10:41
I don't have time right now, but i will soon quote you lengthy arguments that none of you have even bothered to address
January 08, 2017 at 01:42
Yeah too bad that my argument wasn't even about that. It was about the direction of rationality itself, which is always aimed at the good. Even if goo...
January 08, 2017 at 01:18
Because I am drawn to Goodness. Goodness is the end in-itself, that for which we do all things. Reason is directed towards goodness - we do things bec...
January 08, 2017 at 00:30
I'm saying that I simply wouldn't consider that whatever to be God if He is not Good. If God, whatever God is appeared in front of me, and God wasn't ...
January 08, 2017 at 00:20
God cannot be evil by definition. That's simply part of what we mean by God. If God were evil, then that would be no different than there being no God...
January 08, 2017 at 00:17
If God were some cruel and evil demon, who enjoyed torturing his creation for no purpose at all - would God be worth worshipping? Is a tyrant, the dic...
January 08, 2017 at 00:14
If this isn't God, would God be worth worshipping?
January 08, 2017 at 00:13
Because God is deserving of worshipping. God is deserving that you angle your whole life towards Him. If He were evil, instead of good, would he be as...
January 08, 2017 at 00:12
I actually agree with you here :P (*goes off to write the event in the calendar*)
January 08, 2017 at 00:10
If he orders you to do evil, would he be God? Would God be God if he were evil? Isn't Goodness part of what makes God God?
January 08, 2017 at 00:09
Would God assign you to do evil? Do you think God has prepared thorns for you?
January 08, 2017 at 00:06
Hmmm... I think this needs to be qualified in some way, and I find it to be more Stoic than Buddhist personally... Buddhism is more about the extingui...
January 08, 2017 at 00:03
Oh common, as if the whole game doesn't change if they are desires and not needs? Really Hanover. Have some dignity man. This is philosophy, not your ...
January 07, 2017 at 23:49
No Sir, but that can't be the role God has created for you, can it?
January 07, 2017 at 23:09
I think this raises an interesting problem. Even the materialist and atheist Epicurus considered sex to be a natural desire, but not a need. He distin...
January 07, 2017 at 22:56
Please refer to the article from Forbes that Baden has linked :P Yes we are, because if we weren't, sexual advertising wouldn't work. We first need to...
January 07, 2017 at 22:17
>:O But certainly God must be happy in my happiness no? He made man and woman one for the other didn't he? Why would God have made sex possible if it ...
January 07, 2017 at 22:12
Great excuse not to deal with matters when they get real, not merely some "casual sex" in a beaker isolated from the rest of life. Sure it's difficult...
January 07, 2017 at 21:36