You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Theologian

Comments

Well, as I posted elsewhere, fundamentally I am a meta-ethical subjectivist, so I don't think that anything is wrong. I am not devoid of moral sentime...
June 13, 2019 at 23:54
Anyone interested in the secondary lit on Kant may also find this interesting: It also deals with Kant's ability/inability to deal with competing ethi...
June 13, 2019 at 22:05
I'm about two thirds of the way through writing a more serious reply to some of the arguments raised. In the meantime, I've discovered a definitive an...
June 13, 2019 at 22:05
One thing I can't quite tell about your suggestion from what I see on Amazon: does it look like a textbook? Is it built like a textbook - I mean physi...
June 13, 2019 at 21:34
Something just occurred to me: The Hitchhiker's Guide to The Galaxy. It's a loose interpretation of what I had in mind when I OP-ed, but not entirely ...
June 13, 2019 at 21:28
I'm not sure if it's a little too similar to the last book I gave her, which was the Arthur Waley translation of Monkey.
June 13, 2019 at 21:26
Well, thanks to you we're up to 10 now! I'd throw in another five, but... do we dare??? :gasp:
June 13, 2019 at 20:50
Smiles and sunshine, tim. Only smiles and sunshine. :smile:
June 13, 2019 at 20:42
I agree! :up:
June 13, 2019 at 20:24
Not to worry. But now you are going to have to wait for me as I'm actually quite sleepy and about to log off. Sorry! :gasp:
June 13, 2019 at 07:30
I would be glad to. Perhaps in the next day or two though, as I am a little tired right now. And perhaps you could also refrain from ad hominem attack...
June 13, 2019 at 07:12
Oh, Lord! :roll: Let's just agree that someone is completely missing the point. Willfully or otherwise.
June 13, 2019 at 06:00
Well, one truth I'm going to utter right now is that I'm not familiar with all the terminology you're using, so I was planning on doing a search on so...
June 13, 2019 at 03:22
Hmm... I'm going to have to go think about that. I may get back to you.
June 13, 2019 at 01:58
I’ve been thinking some more about this. I know I wavered on my original formulation at one point, but I’ve come back to it. I want to stress that I m...
June 13, 2019 at 00:40
I can't deny that that was an unstated premise of my argument. But I would assert that to say that truth is relative is precisely to deny its universa...
June 12, 2019 at 18:25
But you know, if Kant really is as context insensitive as I've been saying... Is hitting people with rules something I - or he - would will to be univ...
June 12, 2019 at 16:19
Thank you, schopenhauer1; on both counts! And you know, that comic really did make me laugh out loud! :lol:
June 12, 2019 at 16:12
Nope, I'm afraid I don't. I recognize I may be wrong about the implication of the first formulation if the CI. And I realize it is not your responsibi...
June 12, 2019 at 15:54
You've raised a few objections/questions that I think show that my attempt at a scientific definition needs to go through another round of refinement....
June 12, 2019 at 15:42
Wow... thank you also, Stephen! I seem to be doing really well on this thread! :grin:
June 12, 2019 at 14:36
Wow... thank you! :grin:
June 12, 2019 at 14:07
Again, it's important to begin by distinguishing between attempting something like a scientific definition that gets at the heart of what we are deali...
June 12, 2019 at 12:33
I couldn't resist. I suggest you blame auto-correct!
June 12, 2019 at 12:07
Yeah... I'm gonna have some difficulty ridding myself of that one too! :grin:
June 12, 2019 at 02:54
I’ve been thinking about how I might myself deal with this objection. Of course, it applies not just to biologically infertile humans, but to all orga...
June 12, 2019 at 02:19
I myself want to consider two different approaches to deciding what life is. First of all, life is a natural language word – specifically from the Eng...
June 12, 2019 at 01:18
Astonishingly, the SEP doesn't seem to have a dedicated page on logical positivism! https://plato.stanford.edu/search/search?query=logical+positivism ...
June 11, 2019 at 21:05
I can't fault your logic there! And truthfully, that hadn't occurred to me. Kant says only to act in ways that you would allow everyone to act, all th...
June 11, 2019 at 20:03
If you just do a search of critique of pure reason pdf, you'll get a lot of options. EG http://strangebeautiful.com/other-texts/kant-first-critique-ca...
June 11, 2019 at 16:19
My only tip is that I'm referring to the old pen and paper role playing game from the 90's. Oh, and try it: you'll love it.
June 11, 2019 at 15:50
You know, I've thought about it some more, and I can see that it is necessary for me to recant on something I said in my previous post. I said that: W...
June 11, 2019 at 14:23
The sun is a paisley bumblebee, Crawling across my face. Therefore the moon is a rhubarb tree, Somewhere deep in space. Therefore Shamshir’s soundly r...
June 11, 2019 at 13:15
Clearly, every belief exists as a belief. But what then is a belief? Beliefs are propositional attitudes, and most beliefs, such as a belief in God or...
June 11, 2019 at 12:36
"The logical picture of the facts is the thought." http://www.kfs.org/jonathan/witt/t3en.html To "believe in something" is merely to hold a picture in...
June 11, 2019 at 12:08
I think Baden is on the right track, but not quite there. But first, an acknowledgement: "Canada," as others have observed before me, is simply a word...
June 10, 2019 at 23:04
You are right of course that my argument crucially hangs on the segment of my post that you have quoted. I have not read Kant first hand, and make roo...
June 10, 2019 at 21:51
FWIW I think your fundamental problem is here: I am not saying you are wrong. I am saying you are at the level of raw assertion. Think of certain AI c...
June 08, 2019 at 23:04
Well, you began the thread by saying that evolutionary psychology was a pseudoscience because the mind was always one step beyond a computer. Then, in...
June 08, 2019 at 22:35
Because when I said: You responded: So it seemed to me that you were saying that we were trapped in infinite recursion, and that this was a fatal flaw...
June 08, 2019 at 21:12
Actually, one last post... Two points: 1. I don't think the recursion problem is the fatal flaw you see it as. You see, I think you're thinking in the...
June 07, 2019 at 21:03
I'm actually getting a bit sleepy. Will respond tomorrow. Or possibly later today, depending on where you are in the world. Night all.
June 07, 2019 at 20:08
I'll get back to you on recursion shortly. For now, though, I'd like to examine this: Are you saying that literally all descriptions are observer rela...
June 07, 2019 at 19:30
Ugh... I think I forgot to "reply" to you when I responded above. I post this so you'll get a notification. My apologies. I'm new here. :roll:
June 07, 2019 at 19:06
PS If I understand you correctly, it seems to me that your argument leads to the conclusion that mind can never fully describe mind because mind, perf...
June 07, 2019 at 19:01
How would you feel about the position that yes, it does mean that it is what you're describing it as; it just doesn't mean that it can't be other thin...
June 07, 2019 at 18:47
I would try to resolve the issues here as follows: 1. Evolutionary psychology is the attempt to explain what are regarded as psychological phenomena b...
June 07, 2019 at 16:21
Hmm... will have to look into this. Cheers. Alternatively, I might just start a thread on the subject, go out on a limb, and see if anyone can saw me ...
June 07, 2019 at 12:32
Incidentally, I have a question for you that I've been thinking about. If you're a big fan of Wittgenstein, I imagine you have more than a passing acq...
June 07, 2019 at 12:16
Why thank you! I'll try not to disappoint! :wink:
June 07, 2019 at 12:10