Shamshir

Someone.

It's not implied anywhere - is it?

Will you or won't you propose a reasonable benefit of hate speech?

Propose a reasonable benefit of hate speech.

The abolition of gender would involve the abolition of psyche. Do you think these neophiles could pull it off?

And what's going to differentiate that sound ground from a belief?

Do please elaborate.

Have you tried like this? https://image.freepik.com/free-photo/woman-with-banana-smile_23-2147799031.jpg

Here's two ways to look at it. It's not an event in your life, as you're not living - life ends where death begins. It is an event in your life, but a...

This stupidity has been prevalent throughout history - it only appears to manifest more often now, for two reasons: One, your own involvement with the...

A stupid man and a lying man can be a great source of learning; both lucrative and bitter.

Then it would follow, as I've thought it through, that a door or gate or anything of the sort - is a passage. That said, language is known to mutate -...

Now you're going to spark another ethics thread, about cross-fertilization and cannibalism.

When you say 'open the door' - are you opening up the barricade and inspecting its insides or are you moving the barricade and opening up a passage?

A door is a passage. The thing with the knob is a movable wall.

If one is able to reproduce, one has the right to have children - but whether one is right in having children, is discerned by other qualities - not m...

Take a deep breath and realise that Hindu culture precedes Persia.

Neither am I; though it doesn't matter. That said, one goes hand in hand with the other - whether it's ancient Theology contrived as Mystical Teaching...

The message of Genesis isn't actually that humans screwed up listening to the Devil - and neither is the Devil implied within the Genesis story. The D...

Funnily enough I wasn't asking about Aristotle, I was asking you - and without fail, you produce a tangent and no answer. Now here's a little lesson f...

It's not an impossible answer, it's an omission on your part. Similar to the popularly phrased question: Would you rather be rich or happy? - it's mis...

A machine is a predetermined compound of abilities - so would you equate man with machine? In addition, explain having laws - as they would have no sw...

If I may add, maybe those people are starving as punishment for some crime. A wise man once said: Before you pull someone out of the well, consider wh...

They are not so certain - they are a paranoid assumption based in a hopeless state of mind. This very assumption is what leads to feral children - it ...

What about the option where neither happens? Even if it is an improbability, it's not an impossibility, is it?

The whole post is oozing hypocrisy. Okay, boy - if and when you get to the tender old age when there is no one left to visit or care for you and you b...

First off, the choice is only 100% of suffering if you're an utter wimp who can't defend himself and is scared of dying; to add to which - your assump...

So your rights outweigh the rights of the child you were so vehemently defending moments ago. Point in fact, you're just a narcissist who doesn't care...

Then I'm not imposing natalism - I'm simply a conduit for the child; which in due time after garnering enough experience, can decide whether life is w...

Make up your mind already. Can I or can't I impose existence on the nonexistent?

They don't exist and you forced them not to exist. Then I can't impose either natalism or antinatalism. Keep running this hamster wheel over and over,...

Then I'm not imposing and natalism isn't wrong; and we go full circle.

If it's wrong, then don't impose antinatalism - as you have neither your unborn nor your newborn offering consent.

No children - no future; thus the children are the future and its hope rests with the them. Look around you. How malicious human history has been and ...

It's laden with hypocrisy and cowardice. Someone refuses to end their life prematurely but insists on denying a newborn life on behalf of an unborn. B...

You can supply me with all the whiny rhetoric you wish, but it would be like arguing sharks don't exist just because you've never seen any. You're usi...

History shows plenty of examples otherwise. Rotten meat being bad for ingestion is a clear cut one. It is contentious; let's not fool ourselves.

That's an incorrect bias, as it firstly doesn't have to be invented, secondly it would be proposed, not invented, and lastly an innate understanding i...

I haven't. I told you, and you can quote me, it's an innate understanding with basis in observations that should be plainly obvious. To use the ship e...

It's not a funny feeling but a logical observation. Like how ships traveling behind the horizon and back would imply the world is rounded.

A fully determined world is fully mechanical; it doesn't support will.

Only having children can be either ethical or unethical; the opposite is void. The ethics of childbirth likewise do not fall down to conception, but d...

Simulations of Consciousness - otherwise known as NPCs.

That's fine.

It's not that the puppet would possess free will, it's that the puppet is an extension of the puppeteer who possesses free will, and thus that free wi...

Whether free will is a misnomer, I'm not sure; but at least I personally believe it isn't, as it is a compound of Freedom and Will, which should be fa...

Quite the opposite. I'm saying that guesswork does have a basis in logic, as it is reasoning about something. Illogical guesswork would be more akin t...

:ok:

https://i.imgur.com/LtlMFKi.png

It was partly non-determined due to a lack of necessity. Until it happened, it was in the state prescribed to Schrödinger's cat - in that it equally c...