Shamshir

You got me there. In any case, if you're feeling up to it we can continue this in private, lest this thread spiral out like the other two. I made my c...

And the future is an external to mind abstract. Hence present aspects and retrospection are their limit.

But you practically can, you can win all 99 by not switching. Without the assumption that you chose wrong, the three doors are equiprobable - and stay...

You said they reject the external to mind. Aspects are the internal to mind, and retrospect is an aspect of the past.

But one door has zero probability and the remaining two are equiprobable. In theory the chances are 50/50 from beginning to end as the revealed dud is...

One door has zero chance and chances are split to 1/2. Where's the indication that one door is more likely, assumptions that one chose wrong aside?

Again - why are you biasing in favour of one door? The goat likewise raises the probability of door 1.

How does it retain the initial chance?

Let's suppose it is. And you passed this infinitely divisible line, just as you pass from one infinitely divisible digit to another. Is there an issue...

Very well, ant. Open your head, and I will pour the knowledge into it.

Where's the issue?

I did exactly what you asked for, in noting that the afterlife is spiritual by mechanism of The Word. That's the overlaying motif of John, bluntly est...

Internal to mind, meaning aspect, which includes retrospect.

You suffer because you're not grateful. Appreciate the time you spend complaining, as you could have been burning alive this very moment - like someon...

For what you have.

Unsurprisingly your impatience leads you astray. Suffering is a choice. Many choose to sulk and complain, yet there are others who are grateful and ap...

Suffering is a choice.

Page one.

Fair enough. I'll just add not necessarily, and leave it at that.

As established, they cannot. It isn't. But I wish to ask, do you mean as in if there are conceived possibilities it follows that there are unconceived...

But consider I'm not deliberately being difficult and you simply don't get it. In the same way a well written manual on riding a bicycle is worthless ...

That's known possibilities of retrospect. That's what Conceptualism focuses on - missing links via rearrangement. Hence it views Past and Present. Whe...

Then here is a simple question. If I wrote something, and you don't understand it - does the responsibility of understanding not ultimately rest with ...

It would seem your audience is rather faithless - or maybe a bunch of ants? In order to attain clarity as to the matter of doors, we must be inclined ...

That's no fun. Tangling yourself up in an effort to untangle is my method of exploration~ If you've ever any mysterious amalgamations, do share~

Perhaps the issue lies with this 'direct experience'? As I've not spoken of direct or indirect, but merely experience - and without experience, naming...

You could likewise call it 'future', as despite existing, it is a yet unexperienced possibility. Does the myopia of the two seem apparent now?

Do you find the explanation of 'real' as experience, unsatisfactory? It is so - we may outline something we've no experience of as real, but we may no...

Fubar Castell.

That would be the explanation, that possibilities are present but inaccessible, hence rejected. Both frames of possibilities fall prey to objectivity,...

It's 1/7 proportionately - liquid to sulphate.

Then 8 +16 = Chromium, and by context 'Apple'. Check.

How do you eliminate the impossible?

I would deem it an explanation of layered acuity, as the possibilities technically remain the same throughout states, but some turn practically inacce...

Let's consider the three as a Matryoshka. Nominalism is the smallest container, Conceptualism is the next in line and hence forth. What would this exp...

Likewise, what would you say to substituting 'real' in case for Nominalism and Conceptualism with 'perceptible'? They function like a man locked withi...

Absolutely?

But could you at least end this on a high note and answer the question?

Skin versus meat.

Do you agree you are immersed in space?

And then we come around again - you open up the wall, to drive your car out. Why do you favour one over the other? Doesn't matter. Egg with or without...

And I'm pointing out to you that this metaphysical concept is not objective reality but its composite. You, along with the aforementioned proposition ...

And it does. Are you suggesting the imperceptibility of Superman denies this?

It's simple. Without an objective reality - there's nothing to base your question on, and it is void. The very rejection of an objective reality denot...

What in my explanation do you find unsatisfactory? Their transition merely requires space.

Specifically the resurrection of Lazarus falls outside of those terms, due to the timeframe. A bodily resurrection would be within three days, past th...

What else would you have?

That 'becoming' still entails space. There's the 'actual' frame in play, and then there are the 'potential' frames. Now if all frames were to occupy a...

Quite. Time to close the door and pass on through.

Well if there's no space for motion, there's no space for change. If there is nowhere to go, but where you're standing - you can't change position. Li...