You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Merkwurdichliebe

Comments

I would blame this on Nietzsche, who makes many comments that are awfully similar to K's narrative. K would reject postmodernism for the simple fact t...
May 12, 2019 at 00:34
This is an appropriate example of K's dialetic.
May 12, 2019 at 00:31
@"Amity" I would say that K's most significant contribution to philosophic tradition was the power of retraction (given K's disdain for speculation, c...
May 12, 2019 at 00:15
Never read that, but it is on my list after "Stages of Lifes Way". Any chance you have that caption on hand? In Concluding Unscientific Postscript, K ...
May 11, 2019 at 23:56
@"Wallows" @"Amity" K's dialectic, is important to understand. The first two terms "being" and "thought", constitute the existing subject. While the p...
May 11, 2019 at 23:35
Kierkegaard says that "God is subject". And he also says that objective or direct evidence of God is pagan idolatry. He does draw out the divide diale...
May 11, 2019 at 22:58
Absolutely. The subject is the dialectical middle term. It is the negative, and to speak about it directly, positively, is a negation.
May 11, 2019 at 20:37
One of my favorite quotes from K is: "it is the misfortune of our age to have acquired too much knowledge and to have forgotten what it is to exist." ...
May 11, 2019 at 20:10
@"Maw" A present for you: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=aJRY0oJQIZY
May 11, 2019 at 04:30
What about the inner cities, where gun violence has been a reality for over a half century. Were those guns purchased legitimately by means of legisla...
May 11, 2019 at 04:09
Did I not just qualify them all as cowards? You are seeing words, but not reading them. Legislator=brave. :rofl: :cry: :rofl:
May 11, 2019 at 04:02
Guns are for the cowardly and faithless. Gun bans are for the cowardly and faithless.
May 11, 2019 at 03:30
@"Amity" Btw...probably the most underrated philosopher of all time, maybe after Diogenes.
May 11, 2019 at 03:23
If you haven't read him then you need to begin to do so. You will see the charge he puts on you as an existing subject. His perspective is, in many wa...
May 11, 2019 at 03:20
But we can be relatively confident in the assertion that there is some universality in the mechanism which begets the concept-laden perceptual experie...
May 11, 2019 at 02:43
That is, actually what I meant.
May 11, 2019 at 02:35
Fuck, I ruined it. :grin:
May 11, 2019 at 02:34
Its nominalism for God's sake. Fuckin Christmas!!! :joke: As a nominalist, I said: By absolute value I mean "nothing". By univocally I mean "you". And...
May 11, 2019 at 02:33
That Aristotle was of absolute value. And we have univocally confirmed that he is not. Thank you.
May 11, 2019 at 02:25
Yes
May 11, 2019 at 02:23
You always get my jokes. So, look into the humor and you will get the meaning. :grin:
May 11, 2019 at 02:22
I hope he answers: "the lazy edgelord".
May 11, 2019 at 02:16
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
May 11, 2019 at 02:13
Let me just re-emphasize. :ok:
May 11, 2019 at 02:10
Can you present an example where this has occurred in our discourse? Not disagreeing, only looking for a live example of such error so it can be prope...
May 11, 2019 at 02:08
But even then, the best way to watch is by entering the stadium. Watching a summarization on TV never matches being there, live at the bocce ball matc...
May 11, 2019 at 02:03
@"Janus" Speaking to a nominalist is like speaking to one under the oath of silence, you can always answer their questions for them, and with no resis...
May 11, 2019 at 02:00
It's as though we have to enter the same stadium if we are going to compete in a contest of bocce ball.
May 11, 2019 at 01:54
Actually, I just looked it up. That's hilarious :rofl: . But as a nominalist, you know that nothing is absolute, so why would we begin to think such a...
May 11, 2019 at 01:43
I'm also a sucker for the long in the tooth.
May 11, 2019 at 01:38
We're you aware that Jesus, our lord and savior, was revived, RESURRECTED, in a mere span of 36 hours. Hallelujah!!! Beating a dead horse can sometime...
May 11, 2019 at 01:36
Aristotle all day! :strong:
May 11, 2019 at 01:32
...
May 11, 2019 at 01:21
@"creativesoul" @"praxis" @"Janus" So first question: what is the predominant moral authority? And, what is the primary source of that moral authority...
May 11, 2019 at 01:09
Indeed!
May 11, 2019 at 00:59
I like it. I will focus on this as the common goal (in addition to my own, personal, sadomasochist, selfish reasons :joke: ). This point has been on t...
May 11, 2019 at 00:58
Thanks. Hopefully praxis and I don't fuck everything up in your absence. :wink: (Stand by...addressing your last post.)
May 11, 2019 at 00:33
We have gotten this far, I am optimistic that we can take it a bit farther. Where is the groundwork most required at this point?
May 11, 2019 at 00:24
:grin: I agree. I associate moral dumbfounding with irrational moral feeling/intuition which is grounded implicitly in moral though/belief. I feel tha...
May 10, 2019 at 23:04
Nothing you said there had any coherence. By the time I read it, the meaning had completely shifted. Shit! It just happened again with what I'm writin...
May 10, 2019 at 21:31
They certainly lack a neocortex. I can agree with that at the level of immediacy and prelinguistic thought/belief. But, other than the guillotine, I c...
May 10, 2019 at 19:27
You are misconstruing what I said. I was referring to the scenario (regarding moral dumbfounding) in which two or more moral agents are discussing the...
May 10, 2019 at 18:16
Nope. Unfortunately they are enslaved. Enslaved to a system that makes them believe they have a say in how they are governed.
May 10, 2019 at 06:49
And is thought/belief existentially dependent upon experience? Chicken-Egg :snicker:
May 10, 2019 at 06:37
Now you're just getting deep. :flower:
May 10, 2019 at 06:35
I'm trying to reconcile this point. My concern is, what is the criterion for morality, who is making the moral judgment? If it is a true statement abo...
May 10, 2019 at 06:31
Well, just ask an athiest if God has meaning, then ask if God exists.
May 10, 2019 at 06:21
Ok good. I see how you mean to use true. :up: I believe Socrates was morally dumbfounded in his moral conviction to eat the hemlock, and he gave plent...
May 10, 2019 at 06:19
Its a satire on the the assumption that what we say has actual existential meaning. :grin:
May 10, 2019 at 06:13
We went over this before, if I could get away with prefixing every word with " the ", I would.
May 10, 2019 at 06:02