You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Merkwurdichliebe

Comments

Huh? I don't follow.
May 18, 2019 at 00:53
See what I mean? The rationale is ridiculous
May 18, 2019 at 00:40
If morals are only internal, and have no external analogue, then what I said follows. No ifs, ands, or buts.
May 18, 2019 at 00:27
Seems relevant to me. I have no problem harvesting certain concepts for my own use. Doesn't mean I'm Kohlbergian.
May 17, 2019 at 23:50
I didn't mean to invoke Kohlberg. :grin:
May 17, 2019 at 22:15
@"praxis" I was thinking about the distinction between ethical authority and moral agency. The ethical authority always judges the other - it determin...
May 17, 2019 at 22:05
I appreciate those with the patience and prescience to work out their thoughts systematically. Unfortunately there are very few who possess the wherew...
May 17, 2019 at 21:34
@"creativesoul" It seems, I have my own fan club.
May 17, 2019 at 21:18
So then, your morals, and praxis' morals are internal to me. That seems odd, to say the least. There you go again, imposing your irrational solipsist ...
May 17, 2019 at 20:42
That is what we are seeking to work out in our thought experiment. An instruction booklet on badminton would, indeed, be a source of morals if we coul...
May 17, 2019 at 20:38
In sociology and other social sciences, internalization (or internalisation) means an individual's acceptance of a set of norms and values (establishe...
May 17, 2019 at 20:21
Ok, here it is. Source: that which provides the conditions for something else. Morals: concerning what is right and wrong in human behavior Source of ...
May 17, 2019 at 19:59
I don't think you understand. The interlopers haven't read anything except your last post. They have no clue what has been happening here.
May 17, 2019 at 19:49
Not even peanuts. The Interlopers consistently provide nothing to any discussion, nothing but whining and bitching about how they don't agree with any...
May 17, 2019 at 19:47
Says the one who indulges in more unphilosophical gibberish than any other TPF member. Don't be upset just because you cannot understand what's being ...
May 17, 2019 at 19:42
Why would anyone want to go to America. It is falling fast into a tyrannical oblivion. Old habits die hard, I suppose. European history is so deep, yo...
May 17, 2019 at 09:00
To say: "it is wrong to touch the fire because it is stupid to burn oneself in such a way," amounts to a judgement upon an assessment of the stupity o...
May 17, 2019 at 08:30
May 17, 2019 at 07:41
Simple, but a re-re-restart.
May 17, 2019 at 07:37
:rofl:
May 17, 2019 at 06:47
@"praxis" @"creativesoul" Ok, time to get back on track... We were investigating the relation between the cultured individual (viz. one imbued with a ...
May 17, 2019 at 06:31
I find your avatar morally reprehensible, seeing that your name is creativesoul. Unless you are using it for irony. Then it's perfect . :grin:
May 17, 2019 at 06:29
Do you mean when I said: "interlopers"? If so, there's a fine line between personal attack and calling it how it is, and I sometimes have trouble find...
May 17, 2019 at 06:22
I'm still curious to see how far we can take it, and what it will look like when we arrive to a reasonable conclusion. And, after the wave of interlop...
May 17, 2019 at 06:19
@"creativesoul" You can see the disruptive effect of some of these Interlopers on the past page and a half. They showed up after 12 pages of silence a...
May 17, 2019 at 01:43
I could guess. We should officially designate them as: "The Interlopers".
May 17, 2019 at 00:44
Yes. All his discussions take the same pattern, with everyone. He starts out like he is seriously interested in philosophical discourse. But, as soon ...
May 17, 2019 at 00:21
That's why I said:
May 16, 2019 at 23:09
He understands. He's just fucking with you because he has nothing relevant to add.
May 16, 2019 at 23:00
But you know it's true. :wink:
May 16, 2019 at 22:36
TS is stuck in infinite reflection - a perpetual loop of direct relation. He is unable to make the dialectical transition out of immediacy, where a ne...
May 16, 2019 at 22:24
Yes I did.
May 16, 2019 at 22:05
Neither @"praxis", @"creativesoul", nor I have made such statements in our particular discourse.
May 16, 2019 at 22:04
We are not making empirical claims here, we are conducting a thought experiment in existential quantification.
May 16, 2019 at 21:58
So then only you have morality, I suppose. How would you possibly prove that another has morality by referring to "utterances a la sounds/marks etc." ...
May 16, 2019 at 21:53
:lol:
May 16, 2019 at 21:48
We've established an understanding of this through the last 12 pages of rigorous debate, it has been existentially quantified.
May 16, 2019 at 21:45
This does not mean thought/belief cannot be affected by something external.
May 16, 2019 at 21:33
Perhaps. And we are looking for the source of morals. We've already established that evaluations of prelinguistic assessments are primarily acquired f...
May 16, 2019 at 21:31
How do you internalize language? Thought
May 16, 2019 at 21:22
That is why we are examining it. At this stage we pressuppose everything involved in prelinguistic thought/belief. The concept of "internalization" is...
May 16, 2019 at 21:17
A few variables we've examined are: prelinguistic thought/belief, societal conditioning, ethical authority, and internalization of morality.
May 16, 2019 at 21:03
@"S" We have agreed upon a qualifier, an existential constant by which we can conduct a thought experiment. Where is your qualification? where is your...
May 16, 2019 at 20:18
Downhill for S, is uphill for everyone else. And, speaking of going downhill, you never addressed the issue with Hume.
May 16, 2019 at 20:05
Where have they been the last dozen pages?
May 16, 2019 at 20:04
He could explain himself better. But, he might agree with something like: the source of morals is multifaceted. We have been proceeding methodological...
May 16, 2019 at 19:52
Don't forget that pure reason is a construct of Nature, and existed long before we became aware of it. :grin:
May 16, 2019 at 10:53
My hypothesis: particular moral intuitions/feelings can be considered morally dumbfounded in certain relations between independent ethical agents.
May 16, 2019 at 10:02
A central point.
May 16, 2019 at 09:47
@"praxis" @"creativesoul" I can't wait to compile the relevant posts of this discussion. We have made it to 30 pages in less than a month, and for the...
May 16, 2019 at 08:56