You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

TheWillowOfDarkness

Comments

The turn is quite Cartesian in that it is about securing the world we know. One of Descartes major moves is to arrive at a conclusion our understandin...
May 29, 2018 at 06:31
I can't remember where, but I recall someone posting that a spam filter had been getting false positives.
April 14, 2018 at 04:35
This would seem confused becasue it's basically stating realism. The realist poses there is an existing states itself (the object "independent" form e...
April 14, 2018 at 00:13
I don't know Wheeler's self-identification on such a metaphysical issues, but going on the content given, the best kind: some sort non-reductive physi...
April 12, 2018 at 11:52
We are a patch of the universe coming to know itself. No-one is disagreeing with Wheeler there. It in being that minute patch of the universe which ki...
April 12, 2018 at 11:45
To turn the tables here, I'm more or less against humanity and its power here. How arrogant to we have to be to be to say that the presnece of our own...
April 12, 2018 at 11:36
Yes, consciousness just isn't interesting because it ignores the logical definition of whatever we might be talking about in concepts. The consciousne...
April 12, 2018 at 11:25
You misunderstand. There is no question of "essences," just a defitnions of a particular instance social relation and significance. The a priori defin...
March 19, 2018 at 23:41
Oppression isn't falsifiable in a relevant sense. The definition of a social reaction is a logical definition a priori definition which must be known ...
March 19, 2018 at 05:24
Privilege isn't an action done to someone by another, it's an aspect of social being, a meaning of states or actions present in society. In the contex...
February 10, 2018 at 23:29
More or less agreed, which he does. My point was the quiz seemed misunderstood this aspect, and confused it with truth or values. So the quiz is simul...
February 01, 2018 at 12:34
1. Nietzsche (100%) 2. Kant (58%) 3. Protagoras (42%) 4. Sextus Empiricus (36%) 5. Aristotle (29%) 6. Hume (21%) 7. Aquinas (15%) 8. Augustine (0%) 9....
February 01, 2018 at 11:58
That actually leads to refutation of creation ex nihilo (in the sense of saying there was nothing present form which the universe came) because God is...
January 15, 2018 at 03:17
In: #MeToo  — view comment
It's all implied by the way you are using "the sort of woman" in question as some sort of rule which defines what an individual woman thinks. You are ...
January 14, 2018 at 03:02
In: #MeToo  — view comment
It's not about asking for consent. It's about respecting women and whether they consent. Rather than about what a man might say, it is about whether a...
January 14, 2018 at 02:44
In: #MeToo  — view comment
Not wrong to have preferences, but you are using interest in pick-up lines as a measure of social standing, competence and slut-shaming-- i.e. those w...
January 14, 2018 at 02:29
In: #MeToo  — view comment
The point is you are using a myth of generalisation to relate to a context of an individual women. If a woman is attracted to decisiveness, then it is...
January 14, 2018 at 02:26
And Nietzsche was right. It was Christianity that first brought the scientific attitude into the world and justified it as understanding God's laws. I...
December 28, 2017 at 19:52
Correct. This puts you in illustrious company of yourself: in almost ten years using the name on the internet, I don't think I've had a single person ...
December 27, 2017 at 02:29
I'll probably be hunted down by some gang of funk clowns for stealing their theme song. Let that be a lesson to you kids: don't be curious about seein...
December 27, 2017 at 01:51
Only the narcissism of recognising a localish place I knew about or had visited. Alas, I am a disappointing villain. Still, I'm sure some true crime s...
December 27, 2017 at 01:45
I was hoping to recognise a landmark. The trees look familiar to me, but they could be in a garden or park in at least half Australia-- the mystery re...
December 26, 2017 at 11:59
Kant's point is to centre human knowledge back to human experiences. If we are affected by something, a phenomena, it is necessarily knowable to us, f...
December 17, 2017 at 09:19
That sounds like knowledge to me, someone knows the meaning of something, not "faith." In this respect, people might well ought to call you Metaphysic...
December 10, 2017 at 15:40
...but you haven't been arguing the opposite to me. When I responded about the issue with treating it as a matter of evidence, you insisted a claim to...
December 10, 2017 at 15:30
I understood you position perfectly. You keep saying the Catholic has made a dubious/falsified claim claim about the blood and wine: My point is an ac...
December 10, 2017 at 15:06
All I'm doing is pointing out what would be required to have a testable claim of Jesus's flesh and blood appearing. Since the Catholic doesn't make th...
December 10, 2017 at 14:53
I'm not exaggerating. My example was what would have to be true if people believed bread and wine were "literally" flesh and blood, under the definiti...
December 10, 2017 at 14:35
I mean there are different meanings of "literal." Catholics don't literally expect to see their bread turn into Jesus' flesh or wine run into blood. T...
December 10, 2017 at 13:16
The trouble is Hume has an implicit and unstated a priori notion of things: that's how he indexes bundles in the first place. Hume didn't begin with u...
December 10, 2017 at 13:01
I think there is a problem with this account of causality: the role of the states themselves is eliminated. We walk away saying causally is only in ou...
December 10, 2017 at 12:14
Which makes "miracles" nothing more than unexpected events, whether by that's by present scientific theory or common experience. None of them were eve...
December 09, 2017 at 22:48
I mean it's taken to be a meaning of the bread and wine in question, rather than to be literally what the states in question are-- just as we might sa...
December 08, 2017 at 23:52
This is silliness. Transubstantiation is not an empirical state. It's symbolic, metaphorical, a necessary logical expression given by particular state...
December 08, 2017 at 23:06
Kant is mistaken because in making the argument causality must be equivalent to our thinking, he forgets causality is not our thinking. Our thinking o...
December 08, 2017 at 22:17
What is the "concept of causality" exactly? It seems to this sort of objection hasn't given it much thought. If it is our concept, then it is our expe...
December 08, 2017 at 14:08
For sure: that's the issue. In both cases, "causality" is viewed as some sort of logical force, with Hume noting it's not apparent in empirical observ...
December 07, 2017 at 13:18
Right... but that's the problem: the "causality" Kant is talking about is not an empirical state. We don't, as Hume was at pains to point out, observe...
December 07, 2017 at 11:00
That's an issue for Kant because his position ascribes the universal quality to it. Supposedly, it is the necessary connection lost between casual sta...
December 07, 2017 at 10:19
This is a red-herring. It misses people may know there intentions of wishes without specifically naming then. People can general kiss their SO not bec...
November 28, 2017 at 22:24
I'll have to do a thread someday on the sexism of both the conservatives and liberals. You and Sapientia can be my major case studies.
November 27, 2017 at 14:01
No. "Sexist" is used to refer to someone how has engaged in sexist actions. You're under the false impression I was using "sexist" to refer to some so...
November 27, 2017 at 13:49
That misunderstands how sexism works. It's individual actions which is sexist, not a sum total which is used to determined whether someone is sexist o...
November 27, 2017 at 13:41
The server does that for me; I just look up the relevant post when required. Little point trying to show you're not sexist as accused? Indeed. One can...
November 27, 2017 at 13:36
I've already got many examples showing the opposite. There is no falsehood and nothing to apologise for on my part. For you to show otherwise is impos...
November 27, 2017 at 13:27
Maybe in some situations, if you were taking a class, for example, and went around taking questions from everyone, leaving the women only two question...
November 27, 2017 at 13:23
They are similar. In both cases, you are missing a wider context of how your actions have a particular impact on women and an understanding which deva...
November 27, 2017 at 13:02
The first part if great. The second part is nonsense. Feminists taking issue with sexism and the abuse of women doesn't create some victim narrative w...
November 27, 2017 at 02:57
This is exactly the sort of thing that recognising the irredeemability of sin seeks to avoid. When sin is redeemed, it becomes cheap in exactly this w...
November 27, 2017 at 02:52
I agree with him a bit and disagree with him a lot. My position takes unenlightened's second half further: in immorality, we are toxic and there is no...
November 27, 2017 at 00:21