You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Streetlight

Comments

The importance of Kripke's intervention though (imo) has to do with the way in which he tackles questions of modality - that is, necessity and conting...
December 19, 2016 at 10:26
Whether you're speaking literally or figuratively here is irrelevant though. As is the talk of 'visualizing'. It's a question of formal identity condi...
December 19, 2016 at 10:19
If I may, one way to think about this is to consider what allows you to speak of two worlds with different Obamas in the first place. Kripke's point i...
December 19, 2016 at 08:39
Mmm, I should have qualified - the last refuge within the sciences themselves. Although to be fair, this too overstates the case somewhat. Abiogenesis...
December 18, 2016 at 00:22
I think it's important not to confuse or conflate science with naturalism. If the former refers to a series of methodologically constrained practises ...
December 17, 2016 at 11:37
Frankly, the 'interminable debates' on quantum theory - itself a tiny sliver of the unquantifiable success of naturalist approaches to nature - has go...
December 17, 2016 at 06:08
But this is just wrong - both at the level of facts and definitions. The whole point of naturalism is to abjure transcendent explanations such that th...
December 17, 2016 at 05:57
Doneski.
December 11, 2016 at 11:06
- Gilles Deleuze, Empiricism and Subjectivity
December 09, 2016 at 07:03
Daniel W. Smith - Essays on Deleuze May or may not be my last Deleuze reading for a while, unless I decide to pursue a Logic of Sense reading project,...
December 08, 2016 at 13:41
Interestingly though, the claim that God is Being has tended to hew worryingly close to atheism itself, insofar as the difference in kind from God to ...
December 07, 2016 at 23:07
A universal Turing machine just is a system that evolves through state space. Or better, it simulates (computes) by means of its sequential progressio...
December 06, 2016 at 08:41
No, I'm not asking that (I have no idea where you even pulled that from?), and no, I don't simply 'prefer' the term state-space, insofar as state spac...
December 06, 2016 at 03:14
I don't understand what you mean by a 'computational entity'. And while 'logical space' has a close analog in the notion of state-space, which can be ...
December 06, 2016 at 03:00
Again, computability doesn't mean just 'can be replicated inside a computer', which is a vague and imprecise statement. Computers do their computation...
December 05, 2016 at 11:53
Yeah, you need to explain what it means for something to be computable. Generally, this has a very specific meaning, to do with being able to model pr...
December 05, 2016 at 10:56
- Gilles Deleuze and Claire Parnet, "On the Superiority of Anglo-American Literature", Dialogues II
December 05, 2016 at 04:09
Eh, I got ahead of myself in talking about knowledge here. The thing to note is that perception is one manner - and definitely not the only manner - i...
December 03, 2016 at 03:16
One needs to be very, very careful to distinguish between perception and existence. To say that the world looks or feels or smells the way it does bec...
December 02, 2016 at 17:12
But even in idealist ontologies, Being is almost never denied to the non-living: the Being of the fire or the hat or the society might be 'mind-like' ...
December 02, 2016 at 09:15
You seem to have misread the context of the quote, which relates to the subject matter of ontology.
December 02, 2016 at 07:58
By all means, speak about philosophy, but don't make things up about it. If you're going to say that ontology "arises in relation to first-person pers...
December 02, 2016 at 05:19
'Thing' is a word that barely belongs in the philosophical lexicon (with the exception perhaps of Heidegger's analysis of the term), so I don't know w...
December 02, 2016 at 02:41
Because anyone with a modicum of philosophical education doesn't equate Being with things that are alive. Cf. Aristotle: "Substance is thought to belo...
December 02, 2016 at 02:19
Yes, and one you get past primary school grammar lessons, you can read, say, the list of primary questions that the wiki has on the subject, practical...
December 02, 2016 at 00:21
I don't know why you keep pushing this line which is simply historically and factually incorrect. Read the Parmenides, or Aristotle's Metaphysics: in ...
December 02, 2016 at 00:05
Depends what you mean by ontology - I suspect I mean it differently from you: as I understand it, an ontology (roughly) is an account of what is: to a...
December 01, 2016 at 15:29
What is your theory of knowledge? What is your theory of perception? What is your theory of experience? Why are you conflating these things?
December 01, 2016 at 15:09
It's not just defining one's terms though, as if it were a preliminary exercise to the main event: if properly conducted, realism or anti-realism will...
December 01, 2016 at 15:08
Literally questions about what it is one is talking about when one takes a side either way. If you say: 'all is thought' or 'you can't get outside of ...
December 01, 2016 at 14:45
Yeah, its one of my favourite scientific experiments: the perceptual world is a significant world. This was basically the founding insight of phenomen...
December 01, 2016 at 12:09
These are awesome questions, but there's alot of presuppositions behind them need to be unpacked, and in some cases, perhaps reworked altogether. As a...
December 01, 2016 at 06:28
Sure, and tellingly, their views tended to be considered rather fringe, to the extent that they challenged not simply 'the external world', but philos...
November 29, 2016 at 14:35
Ironically, I reckon the largest impetus that fuels such debates is nothing less than the spirit of modernity itself, with it's concern over epistemic...
November 29, 2016 at 13:06
Come, join, we have cake and beer.
November 29, 2016 at 11:34
Because literally nothing of philosophical consequence follows if you take a position one way or the other. The whole barren debate turns upon the ont...
November 29, 2016 at 06:51
Part of the problem is that neither realism nor idealism ought to be 'starting points': these positions ought to follow (or 'fall out from') from othe...
November 29, 2016 at 05:37
Pretty much the only way to go about this. The OP's options for response all pretty much begin with 'The world is...' - but forget the world: we can b...
November 28, 2016 at 03:48
Yeah, exactly: the idea is to recognize the incredibly precarious nature of thought - there is no guarantee that thought will take place: it is only e...
November 26, 2016 at 03:10
I'm afraid my Quine is limited to a couple of essays here and there, and not on this subject. Would be interested in any particular readings you'd hav...
November 25, 2016 at 08:31
What's interesting though is that the reflection on the necessity of thought directly and explicitly excludes any consideration of teaching and learni...
November 25, 2016 at 07:19
Yes, thinking of things in terms of forgetting is quite a useful way to approach things too. If we move to valorize learning instead of knowledge, for...
November 25, 2016 at 05:25
Pragmatism.
November 24, 2016 at 10:19
Given your idiosyncratic 15 word vocabulary, I dont want to make any presumptions about what you're asking.
November 24, 2016 at 10:16
Sure, but the Platonic understanding of knowledge still bears it's rather considerable influence over epistemology today. Whether it be knowledge of t...
November 24, 2016 at 09:33
Gilles Deleuze - Bergsonism Gilles Deleuze and Claire Parnet - Dialogues II
November 24, 2016 at 08:26
What do you mean?
November 24, 2016 at 08:25
Also, William Connolly has a great discussion on the above quote on flux, especially with respect to the sciences, where he directly makes the connect...
November 21, 2016 at 08:44
And ‘islands of stability’ is not a bad way to put it. Here is TSZ: "If timbers span the water, if footbridges and railings leap over the river, then ...
November 21, 2016 at 08:31
I think this is more or less exactly the move Nietzsche makes: truth and falsity becomes forces in Nietzsche, they are expressions of 'will-to-power'....
November 21, 2016 at 08:14