You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

unenlightened

Comments

In the UK... It costs about £70,000 to build a house - a nice modern insulated one. The average house price is somewhere around £270,000. The £200,000...
October 08, 2016 at 21:58
This suggests that there is a quantity of opprobrium that cannot be created or destroyed but only deflected from one to another. But gays were never r...
October 08, 2016 at 10:38
And here's an exercise for your homework. Prove without assumptions: "To assume makes and ass out of you and me".
October 07, 2016 at 15:43
No. if there is an individual, then its preferences are itself. It is only in dividing the individual that one part, the preference can be an impositi...
September 30, 2016 at 20:26
Yes. And there is always no one lurking behind the preference not being able to choose it, only an imaginary homunculus.
September 30, 2016 at 19:59
You need to stretch your nostrils if you want to reach into your brain and grasp your preferences. There are bits of yourself that can be grasped, and...
September 30, 2016 at 19:38
This is another homunculus argument very similar to the one that proves we cannot see things. Light enters the eye, optic nerve signals, neurons fire,...
September 30, 2016 at 10:33
Sounds a bit arbitrary to me. I'm the king, so everything morally belongs to me. And such relations are either god-given, or socially given, I can't s...
September 29, 2016 at 17:45
:D Well I must say I am inclined to present the same argument to those who say "taxation is theft". It seems to me that either position is unjustifiab...
September 29, 2016 at 10:04
It is both literal and figurative. Please don't expect me to defend sharing our shirts, it would be un-hygenic. I'm not arguing that property should n...
September 28, 2016 at 20:34
Well it certainly questions the assumptions of this brand of libertarianism, but if one is putting freedom at the centre of everything, I think it is ...
September 28, 2016 at 19:15
I blame the Welsh. Radicalisation began during WW1... http://www.historylearningsite.co.uk/world-war-one/lawrence-of-arabia/
September 28, 2016 at 16:32
I am a monetary antirealist; I don't belive money has any intrinsic value. But I know the people at Walmart like to collect it so I take some to them ...
September 28, 2016 at 16:22
Perhaps you address this elsewhere, but I would like to see some engagement with Proudhon. To put it very simply, property is theft, and taxation is t...
September 28, 2016 at 11:59
You believe X. A's believe X. Therefore you are A. A's believe Q. Therefore you believe Q Q is false. Therefore A's are wrong. Therefore X is false. I...
September 27, 2016 at 11:09
Yes that was a point i might have responded to if you weren't so busy justifying your prejudice.
September 25, 2016 at 20:35
Huh? Does that relate in some way to This? Is there some reason why a white male professor should be preferred? And if there has been an instance or e...
September 25, 2016 at 20:26
Indeed! Love requires freedom, because love that is coerced is not love but a reaction from fear. Love requires the absence of coercive policies, the ...
September 25, 2016 at 14:46
So all your arguments about the union of two as one, and about love are irrelevant. Your policy is not about promoting love at all, nor is it about pr...
September 25, 2016 at 12:18
No, that's you. Marriages break up because people do not want to continue with them. There is nothing natural about the preference for virginity; it i...
September 25, 2016 at 12:05
Back to your tried and failed analogy. We agree about the 70%, then and the government could prevent them from marrying by preventing marriage. The pr...
September 25, 2016 at 11:56
It does not follow at all. I have presented the alternative that adultery should be prevented by preventing folk from entering contracts that your own...
September 25, 2016 at 10:42
Y'all may feel insulted by my failure, until now, to consider this thread worthy of my response. Indeed, if you don't, I feel insulted that you value ...
September 25, 2016 at 10:17
My apologies, no doubt they are. I momentarily cast you in the role of hypothetical co-respondent.
September 24, 2016 at 21:18
I hesitate to offend your sensibilities, but in the interests of my love, I have to inform you that it was only in the act of adultery that she was aw...
September 24, 2016 at 21:00
We wouldn't be discussing punishment.
September 24, 2016 at 20:31
Yes she would be hurting me. Do you think divorce is less painful than adultery? I assure you that the rejection is what hurts, not the mere breach of...
September 24, 2016 at 20:29
But my love had no idea what she was missing 'til she met you.
September 24, 2016 at 20:12
Yours is the mean and nasty place, that would punish my love if she no longer loves me.
September 24, 2016 at 19:48
Yes, when your analogy fails, find another that might work. But I do not have any desire to be one flesh with a robber.
September 24, 2016 at 19:32
Yes indeed. And the best protection is not to carry on living with the cancer, but to get a divorce. Not much point in punishing the cancer though.
September 24, 2016 at 19:15
But I have adopted it. I am the injured party in this hypothetical, and you want to injure me further by punishing my other half. But more than that, ...
September 24, 2016 at 19:06
The thread is about punishment for adultery. Punishment can only protect to the extent that it deters through fear. But let us be clear. Punishment fo...
September 24, 2016 at 16:14
No, I'm not advocating that at all. I'm saying that contracts are fine in a limited sphere, and so long as the terms are reasonable, and there are sui...
September 24, 2016 at 15:57
Can't argue with that, I chose it myself. A strong argument that anything I say can be dismissed without argument. It is not a fact. Show me the stati...
September 24, 2016 at 14:26
Marriage should be banned. It is a form of enslavement, which the emphasis here given to adultery illustrates. It institutionalises the ownership of a...
September 24, 2016 at 11:57
Not wanting to disrupt the reading group, but here is an old-fashioned analysis of the highly ambiguous word "meaning". Probably don't bother to read ...
September 23, 2016 at 14:10
Become a philosophy moderator; you get to be penniless, do philosophy, and be edifying. Or if you are really selfless, any of the caring professions w...
September 23, 2016 at 09:17
If will-be propositions) cannot be derived from is propositions, then it seems we start out with will-be (independently of is)? Well not exactly indep...
September 21, 2016 at 10:03
Fortunately, one can conceive of a brick without having an actual brick in one's head. Recite this mantra whenever such problems rear their befuddling...
September 19, 2016 at 10:05
Perhaps I am out of date; my recollection is that laws of nature are derived from observations of regularities. Where there are no regularities, such ...
September 17, 2016 at 20:31
Choice (or if you insist, "choice") determines and is itself determined under determinism by initial conditions. At the end of the road I have a choic...
September 17, 2016 at 16:54
I don't think it disallows anything, it merely allows that while I condemn them as bloodthirsty, racist bigots, they also condemn me a a weak-willed d...
September 16, 2016 at 15:48
Amongst the questions seldom asked by philosophers is, "what are tools for?" One does not expect much of an answer beyond "tools are for doing things....
September 16, 2016 at 10:14
In: Humdrum  — view comment
The old bastard has been appraised of your missing.
September 14, 2016 at 12:10
In: Humdrum  — view comment
https://alcohol.stanford.edu/alcohol-drug-info/i-bet-you-didnt-know/red-cup
September 13, 2016 at 20:49
Can I ask you to clarify something? If it is sensible to say that an act is good or bad, 'eating babies is morally wrong', say, then beliefs that lead...
September 10, 2016 at 15:32
Indeed, I meant you too. I like to share the insults around.
September 09, 2016 at 17:19
I was referring to myself. But as this clarification indicates, I wrongly assumed that someone who is fucking offensive is an offensive fucker. You ca...
September 09, 2016 at 17:10
You've seen it many times, because I consider it necessary from time to time, and not unnecessary. Moderators are here doing quite tricky, and necessa...
September 09, 2016 at 15:24