You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Mww

Comments

Oh, absolutely. It was never intended to be. It is nothing but a measure of best-case-scenario, where it would work just fine if every moral agent gra...
July 08, 2020 at 19:01
True enough, insofar as one would have to existentially be in a position to decide something about the trolley switch in order for such scenarios to h...
July 08, 2020 at 17:28
Assure away, but you can’t prove it. The very best you can say is that your individual subject is necessarily grounded in physical conditions, which n...
July 08, 2020 at 15:41
Interesting. As soon as I figured out the emboldened text referred to the section above it, rather than below, as is the norm in dissertation....... A...
July 08, 2020 at 14:08
That’s fine, as a personal view. We all have them. I wonder, though, how you justify having no morals. It must depend on what you think morals are, su...
July 07, 2020 at 13:17
Understanding is the first and primary conscious activity in humans, so understanding is always evident in any judgement. There are only two kinds of ...
July 07, 2020 at 13:09
This is moral relativism writ large, and for better or worse, it is us. I might have worded the truism a little differently, but the gist is there.
July 07, 2020 at 11:10
Hmmmm......I suppose one could say a mathematical proof is in its form, that is, I can prove this theorem with this formula, but that still leaves a n...
July 07, 2020 at 10:57
Sorry, I’m gonna need some help with that. It’s possible to reconcile a fallacy with a validity, so I’m not sure what I’m being asked. —————— Only bec...
July 07, 2020 at 10:30
Nope, not saying that. You and I and Kant knew everything from a human perspective has to do with the brain. Nevertheless, if nobody knows exactly the...
July 07, 2020 at 00:11
Wha....we went from the conflict of consciousness being explainable by materialists or unexplainable by idealists, the fallacy in support of the latte...
July 06, 2020 at 21:31
Nahhh....perhaps I’m too much the literalist, not being too much for subtleties. Or, perhaps the more one searches for them, the more likely he is to ...
July 06, 2020 at 17:45
It is a non-starter, for the excruciatingly simple reason that Kantian metaphysics isn’t as much concerned with the knowable/unknowable, that being an...
July 06, 2020 at 12:13
Be that as it may, for Kant the unknown is contingently so, possibly reducible by experience, the unknowable is necessarily so, regardless of experien...
July 06, 2020 at 11:31
Put me in the “nothing” column. Kant wasn’t concerned with the unknown, as much as the unknowable, and the ultimate unknowable, the unconditioned, thi...
July 06, 2020 at 10:15
Big deal. When those losers have been arguing amongst themselves for the bulk of millennia as we metaphysicians.....and getting the same nowhere as we...
July 05, 2020 at 14:27
I am not the “unguarded listener”, so I have nothing more to say about this. Good luck.
July 05, 2020 at 12:37
Or, create an argument showing that it does. The history of metaphysical dialectic is against you, but then, paradigm shifts have happened before, so....
July 05, 2020 at 11:48
If it is proven you don’t exist, how did you ask whether or not your existence was disprovable? And if it was proven you didn’t exist, how would you k...
July 05, 2020 at 10:39
Reason. Think logically.
July 05, 2020 at 10:24
Simple, really: I’m unaware of beauty when I don’t think a thing I’m aware of is beautiful. What right would I have to think that, if I didn’t already...
July 04, 2020 at 11:45
What right do we have to say that? We see the laws because we put them there, in order to understand the operation of the universe according to our ki...
July 04, 2020 at 10:23
I think I’ll restrict attention to the province of awareness, rather than consciousness. While it is possible to be aware of a plurality of things at ...
July 03, 2020 at 19:45
For things to be the same, or even synonymous to a significant reduction, they should really be so under any condition. But they are not, to wit: I am...
July 03, 2020 at 19:13
Synonymous, yes, insofar as awareness is taken to be the quality of being aware just as consciousness is taken to be the quality of being conscious, s...
July 03, 2020 at 16:03
While I agree consciousness is its content, and would certainly seem to be variable in degree, do you see that the link you gave doesn’t address that ...
July 03, 2020 at 14:06
Ok. Thanks.
July 02, 2020 at 20:53
I expressed a cognition, a judgement in the form of a language proposition, which represents my knowledge of bodies. How, then, would you explain to m...
July 02, 2020 at 19:08
There is a theory of induction; the principle of induction conditions empirical theories, or theories the objects of which ascend from the particular ...
July 02, 2020 at 17:21
Intuitions are not feelings. No theory is verified, for they all operate under the principle of induction; they merely stand as unfalsified....until t...
July 02, 2020 at 16:00
The thesis: The judgements of science are determined by how one feels about it. The antithesis: A subject’s feelings, generally, even if coherent, are...
July 02, 2020 at 15:27
It is nonsense in a way. Understanding, which is what discursive reasoning actually entails, only becomes relevant when we want to know the how of a t...
June 30, 2020 at 17:05
.....likewise taken to mean “have their own core principles that they think entail all of their positions on all of the different philosophical sub-qu...
June 30, 2020 at 16:07
“....merely a lame appeal to a logical condition...” What does it mean to be conscious, such that more of less of it makes sense? According to one spe...
June 30, 2020 at 14:44
“...—a science containing the systematic presentation of the whole body of philosophical knowledge, true as well as illusory, given by pure reason—is ...
June 29, 2020 at 14:32
“...The laws of physics are the decrees of fate...” Much better: referring me to something I didn’t know.
June 29, 2020 at 13:30
OK. Thanks.
June 29, 2020 at 00:15
Of a different nature to be sure, as Kant elaborates: “....The philosophy of nature relates to that which is, that of ethics to that which ought to be...
June 28, 2020 at 13:44
Easy: brain states. Make of that what you wish.
June 28, 2020 at 12:30
Nahhh......you’re doing alright.
June 27, 2020 at 18:01
Answered already.
June 25, 2020 at 21:57
I don’t agree with that.
June 25, 2020 at 19:48
Momentary lapse of reason (thanks, David!! Not you...the other David) on my part. That which is inconceivable is unknowable, not necessarily impossibl...
June 25, 2020 at 16:10
Not necessarily; it is possible for a question not to have an answer, in which case the question seeking an unknown remains unsatisfied, and logical r...
June 25, 2020 at 15:52
Yeah, pretty much, which just goes to show that while materialism alone isn’t false, it alone is insufficient as a explanatory device in all cases. Th...
June 25, 2020 at 11:16
Make up your mind. —————- An analytic judgement can be false. Because “the inconceivable is not the impossible” is false, it is not true under any con...
June 25, 2020 at 10:33
I guess....in the most basic sense, the query presupposes the conception in the subject of the response relates directly to the conception in the subj...
June 24, 2020 at 23:47
What’s necessary for a question, is an unknown that relates to it. What’s necessary for a question to exist, I suppose, is just the expression of it.
June 24, 2020 at 22:33
Nope, not offended. I cherrypicked from your criteria and conditions, so rapidly exhausted my potential argument.
June 24, 2020 at 22:30
OK.
June 24, 2020 at 16:20