You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Isaac

Comments

Yes, the key word there is 'accept'. I'm trying to establish what people think to 'accept' should constitute. If I disagree that homosexuals should be...
March 28, 2019 at 07:17
In: Morality  — view comment
If you were interested in what she said, then you wouldn't need to post it on a public forum. Just read the book. If you thought other people in this ...
March 27, 2019 at 22:44
In: Morality  — view comment
Yes, I suppose it does, but what's important to me in the use of the terms is the pragmatic meaning, the reason why the distinction is of use to me. B...
March 27, 2019 at 20:02
In: Morality  — view comment
... Or you could have just said "did you mean Categorical Imperetive, or did you mean maxim?"
March 27, 2019 at 20:01
In: Morality  — view comment
No problem.
March 27, 2019 at 19:58
In: Morality  — view comment
Really? Are you saying that moral sentiments are not in people's minds? That when I think "murder is wrong" that thought is not taking place in my min...
March 27, 2019 at 19:11
In: Morality  — view comment
I don't think all mental phenomena are subjective. Terrapin and I differ on this significantly. Personally I find the most successful definition of th...
March 27, 2019 at 18:22
Yeah, I had tried to make that clear to start with. You don't want to prevent them from speaking and you don't think their speech is harmful. But you ...
March 27, 2019 at 17:20
Which journal?
March 27, 2019 at 17:18
In: Morality  — view comment
I don't understand what you mean by supported. I presume you don't deny that "Things are morally good or bad to someone.". It is a given that moral vi...
March 27, 2019 at 17:15
In: Morality  — view comment
No, you state that "the monstrousness of these bad actors is bad in itself". Haven't actually heard an argument yet. No. Reason cannot 'produce' anyth...
March 27, 2019 at 17:00
That seems to be exactly what we're both talking about. Someone {the SJW} says X {"sack the racist!"} , it influences person y {the employer} to take ...
March 27, 2019 at 16:35
I don't know. I don't understand infinity either. It's just a logical inference. You think that your calculations using infinity are correct. The grea...
March 27, 2019 at 11:37
I've put your argument into logical form for you. P1 - You don't understand the concept of infinity. ... QED.
March 27, 2019 at 11:12
In: Morality  — view comment
For fuck's sake man. You've written twelve posts in a row and none but one of them address anyone here directly by quote. More than half of them are j...
March 27, 2019 at 08:07
In: Morality  — view comment
Come on. Just re read your own previous comments. The whole thing has been a street fight from start to finish and you're just as responsible for that...
March 27, 2019 at 07:59
In: Morality  — view comment
As I've repeatedly pointed out (with no response, and this goes for @"tim wood" too) this is only true of any particular level of granularity you choo...
March 27, 2019 at 07:50
In: Morality  — view comment
Thanks, I appreciate the support. Is it worth it? Probably not to be honest. It's a strange place here, billed as a discussion forum, but very much co...
March 27, 2019 at 07:39
In: Morality  — view comment
One cannot bring about the desire to maintain social harmony, for example, simply by desiring it. We live in, and interact with, an environment and a ...
March 27, 2019 at 07:26
It was a hypothetical to try and understand your position, not a statement about the real world. I will attempt the same thing in abstract to see if t...
March 26, 2019 at 21:22
... Are the lizardmen coming to get us too?
March 26, 2019 at 19:59
Yes, I think you're probably right. The point I was making is that, in the case slavery, two categories exist - those we're going to treat with dignit...
March 26, 2019 at 19:38
A word can't provide rationale for behaviour, it's just a word. The thing a word means can provide rationale for behaviour, so if people think that it...
March 26, 2019 at 17:43
In: Morality  — view comment
What about relativism prevents two people from seeing if they agree about some fundamental preferences? Relativism does not argue (and has not been in...
March 26, 2019 at 16:36
But what had any of this got to do with the meaning of racism. If the people in question were fired for wearing inappropriate costumes, or using inapp...
March 26, 2019 at 14:04
I get it,but I'm still not sure where your lines are, it all sounds a bit psychological. If you say, on a public forum that something is wrong with SJ...
March 26, 2019 at 14:01
I don't understand how a definition is used to justify anything (other than a statement about the correct use of a word). If 'racism' were to mean pre...
March 26, 2019 at 13:48
As I said, I may need to look at the facts of the case in question, but to save me the time, could I just make it into a hypothetical. If the SJW's in...
March 26, 2019 at 13:26
Yeah, I presumed as much from reading your posts elsewhere. What I was confused about is the reasoning (if any) behind that dislike. Obviously simply ...
March 26, 2019 at 13:14
In what way do you think it is "dangerous". Racism is just a word, surely it can take any definition. If someone coined a new word to describe situati...
March 26, 2019 at 13:09
I know I'm at risk of opening a huge can of worms here, so please treat this as an inquiry, not a retort, but... You said that SJW's were wrong to "pr...
March 26, 2019 at 12:59
Well, you will have to decide that for yourself. 'Moral' and 'immoral' are just words. Whether an action is one or the other is simply a matter of det...
March 26, 2019 at 10:04
Obviously with the huge caveat that such a question can only be answered very much in context, I think here the 'elites' simply refers to those who de...
March 26, 2019 at 09:53
Excessively cynical though it may sound, I think rebellious counter-cultures are just as contrived as the mainstream culture they ostensibly replace. ...
March 26, 2019 at 09:37
I don't think you can get a definite answer. It's just a balance of probabilities. If lots of people around you are telling you that your personality ...
March 26, 2019 at 09:30
I don't think one can remove oneself from an elite group simply by declaring one's exclusion. Indeed, as I said above the definition of meritous art i...
March 26, 2019 at 09:21
Yes, I would say exactly that about the vast majority of philosophy. As I've said about art, that doesn't in any way devalue talking about it, nor red...
March 26, 2019 at 08:47
A story is, objectively, a series of events, thoughts, dialogue and description, as well as maybe a few direct propositions described using (hopefully...
March 26, 2019 at 08:44
The problem is that 'merit' has not been defined. It remains conveniently ephemeral so that it may be re-defined every time fashion changes. Keep the ...
March 26, 2019 at 08:13
In: Morality  — view comment
Your wording is misleading. To claim that they couldn't 'find' anything wrong presumes in its expression that wrongness is something one could potenti...
March 26, 2019 at 08:09
Yes, because they are the very point being analysed, so to include them would be begging the question. We can hardly enquire about the justification f...
March 26, 2019 at 07:47
I think this is the crux of the problem. No one has yet provided any description of 'artistic merit' (as opposed to preference) which is not simply so...
March 26, 2019 at 07:41
Well, that's probably a good thing in terms of increasing diversity, but I think you still know what I mean with regards to the 'elite' who are the su...
March 26, 2019 at 07:31
Yes, that seems reasonable too. Right, but on what grounds? You're still not making explicit the link between the type of knowledge these critics have...
March 26, 2019 at 07:12
No, I'm afraid this is where we differ. It hinges on the 'knowledge' you're supposing them to have. I agree that they would know more about the play's...
March 25, 2019 at 21:38
Yes, I don't doubt you could, but, what I've read so far has been absolutely zero personal justification and a considerably bombastic appeal to author...
March 25, 2019 at 21:34
Yes, I think you may be right. It's this sort of thing I'm arguing against... And the latest ... Just replace 'English scholars' and 'art/artpiece' wi...
March 25, 2019 at 21:17
I get this bit and I agree with you that discussing the merits of art is not a worthless activity. The point that was originally made is that some peo...
March 25, 2019 at 20:59
So what's your reasoning for believing that? How would such a system work for you? Do things become more objective the more people believe them (that ...
March 25, 2019 at 20:09
Yes, I see why you've misunderstood me there. I deliberately said Christianity (the religious enterprise) not the bible (the book I exchanged for 'Eng...
March 25, 2019 at 19:08