You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Pussycat

Comments

Thanks, I guess! It's nice to see that one's efforts are not completely worthless, and the same should go for everyone here.
April 19, 2020 at 22:41
I don't think the tractarian 'state of affairs' describes a static state, as you put it. I think it is in fact quite the opposite, well no, badly said...
April 19, 2020 at 22:30
To be agreeable to everyone you mean? This is never the case, as it seems. After all, a friend to all is a friend to none.
April 19, 2020 at 22:15
I am sorry, Gregory, for leaving your questions posed to me unanswered. Metaphysics, for Wittgenstein, is not meaningless, but senseless, it doesn't m...
April 19, 2020 at 22:00
Regarding the connection of Wittgenstein to Hume, I dunno, let's see what the internets are saying. I will just do a search "Wittgenstein on Hume", an...
April 19, 2020 at 21:35
And you just recapitulated that Wittgenstein was prejudiced. So? Where does this leave us? But regarding prejudice, you don't say something new, cause...
April 19, 2020 at 21:09
I remember that some years ago, I made the connection between what Wittgenstein was saying in the Tractatus, and previous thinkers before him like Hum...
April 19, 2020 at 20:17
huh, pretty quiet today this thread, considering yesterday's orgy. :yum:
April 18, 2020 at 22:06
I have no idea of what you mean by 'humean mosaic of atomic facts', but in any case, yes, W's purpose of language I believe it is "to say true or fals...
April 17, 2020 at 23:20
Russell said at some point that what they were trying to do was to break with the idealism of the time. Most probably he meant what we now call "conti...
April 17, 2020 at 21:42
Yes, I believe it is so, but only if there is nothing else but true/false, right/wrong. However if there are other things in-between or elsewhere, the...
April 17, 2020 at 21:13
What prejudices? What do you mean?
April 17, 2020 at 21:07
I meant what I said from Wittgenstein's perspective at the time of writing the Tractatus, I am not putting forward any ideas of my own. And I think th...
April 17, 2020 at 21:01
So, in all, is there something you praise the Tractatus for?
April 17, 2020 at 10:33
Yes, but this - the truth-functional propositional calculus as you put it, applies only to matters of fact and the natural sciences, not to everything...
April 17, 2020 at 09:28
You are correct, I think, the Tractatus conveys a meaning but with it being senseless. "sense", in the Tractatus has to do with the facts, descriptive...
April 16, 2020 at 20:44
He doesn't admit that it's all wrong, he says it is 'senseless', which is a different thing than 'wrong'. Philosophical propositions, as well as "eluc...
April 16, 2020 at 20:05
For sure. Which is why W. immediately after writes:
April 16, 2020 at 08:50
Yes, he believed he had solved them at the time, but how, is the question. He says so at 6.53: The truth-functions have to do with the propositions of...
April 15, 2020 at 21:20
Because you said that he solved all philosophical problems by analyzing propositions via their truth-functions. Philosophical propositions, pertaining...
April 15, 2020 at 17:43
I think that the way he solved all the philosophical problems was by showing, or at least hoping to show at a later time, that these problems were not...
April 15, 2020 at 14:39
image does not display.
April 11, 2020 at 16:06
Violent delights have violent endings, or so they say.
April 11, 2020 at 16:04
But I think that the book "Who Killed Homer: The Demise of Classical Education and the Recovery of Greek Wisdom" by Hanson and Heath, gives some insig...
April 10, 2020 at 06:31
True, one could find discontinuities and dissimilarities as easily as one would find continuities and similarities, depending on the POV and the seman...
April 09, 2020 at 19:05
https://i.postimg.cc/X7Xn6R11/buying-foreclosure-home-property-bank-questions.jpg
April 09, 2020 at 00:27
I hadn't heard of Durant, well at least not Will, cause I had heard of Kevin! Reading a summary of his work 'The story of Philosophy', I think that he...
April 08, 2020 at 11:54
And so snakes' view paints philosophy as a power-mongering activity or enterprise, wishing to devour everything in its path, just like the game 'snake...
April 07, 2020 at 21:58
I think that what snakes is saying is something like this: Philosophy, since its infancy, attempts to meddle in everything and in everyone's affairs. ...
April 07, 2020 at 12:01
Regardless, what we are talking about here is "significant phase changes in philosophy". Having read Durant's book, what would you say these changes a...
April 04, 2020 at 21:22
Anyway, just waiting on drake's response, but I think there is a passage from Plato's dialogue, "Protagoras", that relates to what we nowadays call me...
April 04, 2020 at 19:51
Who me? Do you object then? Alright then, objection sustained! Tell you what snakes, I'm with you, with you all the way, I also believe that there is ...
April 03, 2020 at 21:40
haha, this is what I wanted to write, well actually something similar like, "where are we? in the philosophy forum, so we are doing philosophy!". But ...
April 03, 2020 at 12:17
Why would anyone that doesn't believe in 'conversation', that it won't lead to a definite conclusion, indulge in such a practice, defending their own ...
April 02, 2020 at 10:14
I think this is a rather naive, or better simplistic and superficial, view that you have of philosophy, that doesn't take into account of all the fact...
April 01, 2020 at 21:59
And syllogisms are of Aristotle, there are no syllogisms in Plato. This is most likely where the brink happened, where the age of logic supplanted the...
March 31, 2020 at 23:10
Ah yes, forgot about this one. Socrates (in)famously never reaches a conclusion, but all his argumentation results in the so-called "aporia", which in...
March 31, 2020 at 22:30
In one platonic dialogue, with Socrates as mouthpiece, rhetoric is praised, and in another it is diminished, what are we to make of this? And in anoth...
March 31, 2020 at 21:45
I have no idea what the public thoughts of philosophers in ancient Athens were, but most likely there was a mixed opinion, if any at all, I bet some w...
March 31, 2020 at 21:04
Rhetoric, you mean, or even sophistry, but both in a neutral way? Is this an epistemological position you are putting forward here, as in the limits o...
March 31, 2020 at 20:08
We are judging all the time, by being both judge and jury, executioner maybe as well, hell, we could say that human is the being that makes value judg...
March 31, 2020 at 19:42
Right, cause StreetlightX made me think it in terms of peasants and peasantry, in a diminishing way that is. And then we could say stuff like, philoso...
March 31, 2020 at 17:03
Derogatively you mean? Folk used as in "peasant"?
March 30, 2020 at 18:57
Yes, I think that philosophers have made an art out of devaluating others, especially ethical philosophers. But if they are so arrogant and offending,...
March 30, 2020 at 11:09
Well, I am drinking most of the time, especially when engaging in conversation, so I'm really ok with that. :cheers: Really, I wouldn't have noticed! ...
March 30, 2020 at 00:59
But yeah, let us entertain that thought, that philosophers are no truth seekers, no wisdom seekers either, that truth and wisdom are in fact myths pro...
March 29, 2020 at 22:12
Yes, well Arthur was always upset, upset with something, a hard man to please, I wouldn't have invited him for supper, that's for sure. But do you thi...
March 27, 2020 at 00:17
But this brings us back on topic, because I think that philosophy, as it has been developed, perceives everything to be rational or logical, and fails...
March 26, 2020 at 02:37
A new situation? What do you mean? I guess there is always a new situation, you can't step into the same river twice, like they say. But I don't think...
March 26, 2020 at 02:32
By 'will', we normally think of what we want to do, but I think it is what we think is right, right to do, right in an absolute sense. When we are abs...
March 26, 2020 at 01:32