You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

hypericin

Comments

But wait, I thought: Have you reverted back to p-zombiehood? How exactly does your conscious mind (if it is) receive information about the world, if i...
January 13, 2023 at 19:18
Who exactly is arguing from its felicitous use as a word? Only you, for me. I think it is just fine. It is a biological explanation for a change (loss...
January 13, 2023 at 13:08
The hard problem is not about consciousness in the abstract, it specifically asks how the biological reality of nervous systems relates to the first p...
January 12, 2023 at 20:23
If this were true there would be as many hard problems as there are nominalizations.
January 12, 2023 at 20:17
Right, and that is a far cry from saying "science needn't bother answering this".
January 12, 2023 at 19:46
There is absolutely a need for one to explain the other, if there was no need there would be no hard problem.
January 12, 2023 at 19:39
For once I agree with @"Isaac". For Chalmers there is an explanatory gap, for Isaac there is no gap, since consciousness is somehow a purely human con...
January 12, 2023 at 19:25
Understanding of the world, not word. Experiences are events, whether or not they are somehow illusory. As such they require an explanation. The bound...
January 12, 2023 at 19:12
But don't stop there, you've left us hanging.
January 12, 2023 at 12:37
Gibberish.
January 12, 2023 at 11:59
Every event must have a cause. If consciousness isn't supernatural, and the physical state of the brain remains constant, then the inversion would be ...
January 12, 2023 at 01:06
Assuming you reject dualism then I don't see how that is conceivable.
January 12, 2023 at 00:47
Gods and pixie dust don't exist, so no account is necessary. But you agree that we have experiences, and therefore some scientific accounting for them...
January 12, 2023 at 00:31
Who said we know nothing of their properties? Their properties just do not match their physical counterparts. In fact, we know everything of their pro...
January 11, 2023 at 09:24
We are aware of an imaginary yellow and blue disks, which is just an awkward way of saying we are imagining them. Why should imaginary and real things...
January 10, 2023 at 19:56
In: Bannings  — view comment
I don't agree with this one, I always thought he was a high quality poster. I guess I missed the dickish stuff?
January 10, 2023 at 19:17
I don't doubt this at all, nor any of the neurodiversity you point out. I just don't think it is the norm. From what I have read of people who cannot ...
January 09, 2023 at 23:09
To have a first-person experience of it. By report, or by measuring at the neural correlates.
January 09, 2023 at 22:50
Who is claiming you "really" seeing in your mind? Brain activity will be similar whether you are seeing or imagining. But this doesn't mean the logic ...
January 09, 2023 at 22:48
Yes, my experience is the same as yours. I read other posts from people with aphantasia and they make the same mistake. They think we are walking arou...
January 09, 2023 at 19:22
Your suspicion is understandable but wrong, though the subject has not received nearly the attention it deserves. Here is one blog post by a guy with ...
January 09, 2023 at 18:59
You are misusing the word "aware". A camera receives light, but it is not aware of it. A camera taking a picture is not an instance of "awareness".
January 09, 2023 at 18:52
Computationally.
January 09, 2023 at 18:33
This is an excellent point. Not only is it different, but everyone presumes that their own cognitive makeup is universal. Which leads to some incredib...
January 08, 2023 at 21:10
Your brain classifies all sorts of things. But you are only aware of a few. That is proof that awareness involves something more, or other, than just ...
January 08, 2023 at 20:56
I'm not saying that mechanisms can't bring about consciousness. I'm saying that the mere classification of signals is, obviously, not consciousness.
January 08, 2023 at 10:39
It's not just the question of meaning, nor just how it works. It's the question of how these two domains could ever be bridged. "How does it work, so ...
January 07, 2023 at 19:21
This is revolutionary! Machine consciousness has long been a holy grail of AI research. Nobody realized how simple it has been all along! All you have...
January 06, 2023 at 23:06
My understanding: The audio and video of a movie is encoded as a set of 0s and 1s, which is one enormous base-2 number. This binary number is encoded ...
January 06, 2023 at 19:51
What trips people up is conflating an understanding of consciousness with understanding the NCCs (neural correlates of consciousness). You can imagine...
January 06, 2023 at 18:15
Just because you aren't a dualist about consciousness doesn't mean the question just disappears. Consider a DVD. Is the movie "on" the DVD something i...
January 06, 2023 at 12:09
:100: :clap: But this then becomes "good for". The point of "intrinsic" was that the pro-Sally sentiment expressed by "Sally is good" is about Sally, ...
January 06, 2023 at 01:39
Of course consciousness is a state. At any time you may be either conscious or unconscious. The point of general anesthesia is to change your state of...
January 05, 2023 at 21:00
The charm of this story lies with the multiple seemingly inexplicable callbacks to the donkeys. It creates a unique, humorous effect. I'm confused, wa...
January 05, 2023 at 01:56
:rofl:
January 05, 2023 at 01:06
It baffles me that you think any of these questions are unaskable, that they "just are". What a strange, pre-scientific mindset, like answering a ques...
January 04, 2023 at 21:21
Good is not mere approval, as I point out: Can a speaker assert they approve of x, due to an innate quality of x , while at the same time assert that ...
January 03, 2023 at 23:52
Thanks! I knew at least one fellow weirdo would appreciate it.
January 03, 2023 at 22:53
I volunteered to run the next one of these "activities",, it is something to consider if there is interest.
January 03, 2023 at 20:11
Can you link a paper or article? Are you really suggesting that "why not? What's stopping them?" is an adequate answer to any of these?
January 03, 2023 at 20:07
Consciousness is not information. But consciousness is informational. It is a phenomenon arising from flows of information. That is why the hard probl...
January 03, 2023 at 19:12
Going beyond your judgement is out of bounds? I see. You argued that values are arational, and so the question does not apply. I say that values can i...
January 03, 2023 at 07:29
Any number of factors, depending on context. Maybe she is moral and kind. Maybe she is a competent guitarist. Whatever it is, it is something innate a...
January 03, 2023 at 07:26
You were the one arguing that perceptions were effable. So you would eff whatever their perceptions are like to them. Cite one you think is satisfacto...
January 03, 2023 at 07:21
The latter. Otherwise, "prefer" or "like" would be used, not "good".
January 03, 2023 at 00:31
When a speaker declares x is good, they are marking their approval of x. Moreover, they are asserting that this approval springs from something intrin...
January 03, 2023 at 00:17
In my mind, the first three words, "I found him", suggested that there was a special connection between the protagonist and victim, that the victim ha...
January 02, 2023 at 21:41
I've had the same dream, many times. Usually there is a class that I somehow forgot about and never went to, and now there is an important test. Thank...
January 02, 2023 at 21:18
This is debatable. To take a common example, many value money over happiness. This might be irrational, as money might be valued as instrumental towar...
January 02, 2023 at 21:16
I frankly don't have the musical knowledge to make this kind of association. The title was just a filing in of the cliched template: x in key I just w...
January 02, 2023 at 21:03