You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

bert1

Comments

I think that's a compliment. Monism and dualism are bad, triadism is good.
November 24, 2020 at 22:44
This is classic Apo. Perfect specimen.
November 24, 2020 at 22:38
Half of us have no idea what Apo is talking about. He (it must be a he) regularly gets asked to put his stuff in more laymen's terms, but he never doe...
November 24, 2020 at 22:34
:gets popcorn:
November 24, 2020 at 22:01
I'll be especially on the lookout for fallacies of composition and division now.
November 23, 2020 at 21:43
You're every welcome, thanks for asking.
November 23, 2020 at 21:41
I like this bit. Wanking should be appreciated more for its cosmic significance.
November 23, 2020 at 21:41
Not all panpsychists claim that everything has a mind, some claim only that where there is anything, there is consciousness also, i.e. the smallists m...
November 23, 2020 at 20:38
I'm not very well read at the moment, sorry. I haven't kept up that well with developments. There are two camps (among others) among panpsychists IIRC...
November 23, 2020 at 20:20
For me, it means any arbitrarily defined object whatever, for example, half-a-biscuit-kilo-of-air-over-Brazil-rock-on-Mars considered as one thing. Th...
November 23, 2020 at 19:38
Yes, but only if you're making an inference. Simply holding the position that both parts and the whole of, say, a plank, simultaneously have their own...
November 23, 2020 at 13:13
I'll take a look at that, thanks. I'm a Goff fan. He's done very good work on why emergence is problematic with regard to consciousness.
November 22, 2020 at 23:55
It's fine as long as you wear a mask and maintain a 2m distance from the people you are with.
November 22, 2020 at 23:47
Not me. Some panpsychists might be motivated by quantum theory, but I'm not sure who.
November 22, 2020 at 15:06
:nod:
November 22, 2020 at 15:05
Is this intended to be an argument against panspychism? EDIT: My bad, it's an answer to the OP!
November 22, 2020 at 14:48
Good question. The answer presumably is "Because I am me and no on else is." This raises the further question, "Why am I this one and not some other o...
November 22, 2020 at 14:41
This is the best answer to the OP so far.
November 22, 2020 at 12:12
Your questions are all good ones and need answers from the panpsychist. If panpsychists are anthropomorphic, everyone else is anthropocentric, or at l...
November 22, 2020 at 12:10
Yes, I think panpsychism is often arrived at after a process of elimination. The worst theory apart from all the others.
November 22, 2020 at 12:06
The fallacies of division and composition are likely to be straw men, because no panpsychist I am aware of thinks that humans are conscious simply bec...
November 22, 2020 at 11:53
:100:
November 21, 2020 at 20:36
That's good isn't it?
November 21, 2020 at 15:11
I think it's a lot to do with conceptual difficulties around the emergence of consciousness from what has been presumed to be severally non-conscious ...
November 21, 2020 at 12:44
Whereas for me the goal is to traumatise schoolchildren.
November 18, 2020 at 11:58
How do y'all think Bernie would have done? Would it have been this close?
November 05, 2020 at 10:14
Very close. Looks like Ar-Pharazon the Golden may be on the way out.
November 04, 2020 at 20:43
As Melkor stole Elves and corrupted them into Orcs, so biologists took the concept of life and removed all subjectivity from it. Can't bear the bugger...
November 03, 2020 at 17:21
Apparently I know that. But how do I know it?
October 29, 2020 at 01:31
jorndoe, what's wrong, if anything, with the response that from God's point of view, there is no evil? That preserves all the omnis and there is no co...
October 22, 2020 at 13:58
I agree. Read it again.
October 21, 2020 at 08:44
It's all good to God. Disease, vaccines, suffering, stopping suffering, all of it's fine.
October 20, 2020 at 18:23
The OP isn't nonsense EDIT: admittedly it isn't crystal clear and concise, but that's hard to do
October 19, 2020 at 17:04
You've thought about everything haven't you? You must be a brain in a vat or something, fed on royal jelly.
October 19, 2020 at 11:27
David Bohm (physicist) talked about a similar thing. He called it the 'rheomode' I think. From 'Wholeness and the Implicate Order'. I don't have any s...
September 16, 2020 at 15:34
It has long been a rather intense recurring fantasy of mine to have, instead of my silly thin cold skin, a nice thick coat of greasy fur like a seal. ...
September 15, 2020 at 18:55
I'd like to hear @Hanover's thoughts on this.
September 09, 2020 at 22:46
This is good. If God is incapable of pain, then yes, his POV on morality will lack a component that is crucial to ours. The relativist theist does not...
September 09, 2020 at 16:10
Perhaps because suffering is morally irrelevant from God's POV.
September 09, 2020 at 12:52
I'm going to rudely put words in your mouth as I am more likely to understand them that way. How do you feel about the following recasting: Your posit...
September 01, 2020 at 20:28
Thanks, this is interesting. It seems to me that that is consistent with metal-ethical relativism. FWIW, I share these terminal goals. However I don't...
September 01, 2020 at 20:22
Indeed no. You are right to point out this problem with my analogy which is so in-apt I wish I hadn't used it. Matter of course admits of quantity, wh...
August 27, 2020 at 15:53
Great question! :) My view is the exact inverse of Gnomon's (if I have read them correctly). Our identity is constituted by all those processes, and w...
August 26, 2020 at 22:48
Where where? Hear hear! I've listened to quite a few JP vids, interviews and whatnot. I'm no expert on him. I agreed with some of the stuff he said, d...
August 23, 2020 at 21:52
I didn't think you were religious Banno.
August 23, 2020 at 17:06
@Shawn, you could try asking the question again.
August 23, 2020 at 10:28
Ditto most of the comments, but I'm also sympathetic to the OP. Stoicism can easily seem trite and a justification of oppression. It might be helpful ...
August 18, 2020 at 20:23
In: Bannings  — view comment
Yeah he was annoying.
August 17, 2020 at 11:53
Indeed, you put that better than I was about to do. Not everyone will be happy with collapsing the distinction like this, and in characterising others...
August 11, 2020 at 19:49
Getting other people to do what you want them to do. As a panpsychist, I might go as far as to say that reality (the way the world is) is at bottom, n...
August 11, 2020 at 17:58