You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

DingoJones

Comments

In: Bannings  — view comment
So what about that bartricks guy? Why hasnt he been banned yet?
September 23, 2019 at 22:21
In: Bannings  — view comment
:lol: Fuck you lol
September 23, 2019 at 20:19
In: Bannings  — view comment
Seemed like all he did was spam, made worse by his anti-discussion attitude. Like that guy who started the moral subjectivity thread. He banned yet? I...
September 23, 2019 at 19:27
In: Bannings  — view comment
THAT got him banned? Not his ceaseless topic spamming and discussion killing soapboxing? Islam is the magic word I guess?
September 23, 2019 at 16:41
Well first, I am not convinced anything is any different in a delayed response as you describe. That you find it funny is still involuntary, your not ...
September 21, 2019 at 03:28
Then HE is the jerk.
September 20, 2019 at 22:38
Doesn’t matter, again the salient point is that its involuntary (at times). Are you now changing your mind about laughter at least some of the time be...
September 20, 2019 at 22:37
Well thats not fair at all, what the fuck am I supposed to do with a name like “S”?! No play on words when it just 1 letter. What a jerk.
September 20, 2019 at 22:15
Maybe, sure. The point is that in at least some instances of joke/laughter, it is involuntary. Thats what you have to deal with in your view, imo. You...
September 20, 2019 at 22:12
Yes, I anticipated this and used the word “can”.... it CAN be an involuntary response. My point stands I think.
September 20, 2019 at 21:41
So are you for people dying in car accidents? Thats the implication. You like people dying? Thats the implication of your views on the speed limit, pe...
September 20, 2019 at 21:39
Hypnotism doesn't force people to do anything, or even to feel anything other than a light separation from activities. That's my understanding of it a...
September 20, 2019 at 21:09
Laughter can be an involuntary response. There are other such responses from speech of certain kinds aa well. How have you factored these into your vi...
September 20, 2019 at 21:02
Well we’ve just been over it haven't we? Am I remembering wrong? Ok, let me answer to that then. Sorta. Are you in favour of a speed limit of 50km, or...
September 20, 2019 at 20:59
Oh come on! Lol You did that in purpose. Is the influence of speech on a spectrum?
September 20, 2019 at 20:55
Ok, so what about in the case of laughing at a joke? (Or other emotional reactions to words). How does that factor into your view?
September 20, 2019 at 20:53
Ok, so as to whether the influence of speech is a spectrum...yes, but your free speech absolutism is based on other things than whether or not its on ...
September 20, 2019 at 20:35
Right, hence my pre-apology. Alot was said by alot of people so I just wanted to confirm as the essentially same discussion starts up again. Also, I d...
September 20, 2019 at 20:06
So you seem to imply that there is a spectrum of influence, is that fair to say? If there is a spectrum, why would you be a free speech absolutist? Is...
September 20, 2019 at 19:59
No Im not for ACTS of terrorism. Anyway, we’ve been through this. I cannot remember how much of my views we went over, but I remember yours so im good...
September 20, 2019 at 19:46
Ok, so those measurable effects do not include reactions in others? Is that right?
September 20, 2019 at 19:41
K gotchya. :up:
September 20, 2019 at 18:44
What do you mean by “power”, that makes it sound like a compulsion of some kind, is that what you mean?
September 20, 2019 at 18:39
That doesnt really answer my question. Perhaps I could have framed it better, but remember Im not for censorship, even of hate speech. Agency is not w...
September 20, 2019 at 18:37
Is there a middle ground you would consider, where the speaker and listener both contribute to the effects of speech? This would be an alternative exp...
September 20, 2019 at 17:39
Maybe not, always hard to tell. Regardless, complete waste of time. I dont think its how wedded he is to his argument though, there is something else ...
September 20, 2019 at 05:56
I suspect a 4chan high level troll or somesuch, work has gone into the illusion I alluded to. Ill grant that it was a pretty good fake (suckered in tw...
September 20, 2019 at 05:26
We’ve had enough of this guy now...right? I understand that he presents a philosophical puzzle that tempts that philosophical part of the brain that b...
September 20, 2019 at 05:08
Whats stopping you from just ignoring them on your own?
September 19, 2019 at 14:31
I think you are wrong on that, I dont think religious apologisers know how it sounds. I don’t even think some of them realise they are exercising apol...
September 17, 2019 at 20:10
Agreed, pretty lame none the less. My point is, its ignorance (of logic and the new testament Shimshir, Im not making a generalisation about you being...
September 17, 2019 at 18:16
Ok, but surely you see how (and why, obviously) he is using a diluted definition from which his point follows? Wrong, but not non-sensical. What I mea...
September 17, 2019 at 18:07
Ok, but I hope by extending that courtesy you will in turn do me the courtesy of answering my question. Do not think that I have come to bring peace o...
September 17, 2019 at 17:58
No, like an asshole I just jumped into the middle of your discussion. Not sure Ive ever interacted with Shamshir tbh, I lose track of the names. I had...
September 17, 2019 at 17:14
You are either ignorant about the parts of the bible that contradict those passages, or are being dishonest. Either way, you didnt answer my question....
September 17, 2019 at 17:10
Have you read the Bible? It calls for both, why is your interpretation the one true Christian view?
September 17, 2019 at 16:59
Ah, ok. I understand. I misunderstood.
September 17, 2019 at 01:30
If you know what? My point is that you can be unwilling to consent to something you dont know of, to answer your question. Likely not to, in fact. Ugh...
September 17, 2019 at 01:17
Will you consent to a shpruckening?
September 17, 2019 at 00:47
Dude, seriously?! Loo How in the name of almighty Oprah are you still responding after all that?!
September 16, 2019 at 23:47
:lol: :lol: :lol:
September 16, 2019 at 23:33
But then you are discarding the consent of the non-demented version. Its a dichotomy. You have to choose to violate one instance of consent (and there...
September 16, 2019 at 19:13
Wrong. You dont even like vegetables. Meat is no ones friend but for the devils forked feet. (I think that's right, not sure exactly how to play but t...
September 16, 2019 at 18:26
The article is light in details of what exactly the women wanted. Did she want to avoid the dementia, or some sort of other state? Did she address the...
September 16, 2019 at 18:18
Evidently.
September 16, 2019 at 17:31
Well I agree with that point, in fact Id add that the only people T Clark is NOT interested in protecting or making a special exemption for are the no...
September 16, 2019 at 17:24
This is not true. Nazi Germany had religion mixed into their ideology. The Nazi party was endorsed by the church in Germany, and supported by the Vati...
September 16, 2019 at 16:22
Well there it is. The totally hypocritical position Clark holds, completely biased, perfectly illustrated. Well done, but of course it will have no ef...
September 16, 2019 at 16:14
Well said, though I wonder what exactly you mean by “a board like this”. You mean a philosophy forum, discussion forums in general or something specif...
September 16, 2019 at 14:04
:lol:
September 16, 2019 at 13:02