No its not. An Ad Hom is when I attack the person instead of the argument. I wasnt addressing an argument. Identifying when someone is allowing their ...
I would say the shit those folk have to take over their shenanigans is lesser in scope and frequency. There isnt the same venom, nor as many people on...
TDS is not mythical. Maybe it gets tossed around too much as such terms do, but I have met and witnessed it many times. Ive noticed the time and energ...
:100: (edited to add that, it didnt work the first time) It is just as dishonest for people to claim he was suggesting people ingest bleach as it is f...
His defence of Trump and his refusal to placate for the most part. Because of Trump Derangement Syndrome, he has been relegated to a category of perso...
Ok, so is that individual good translate to the group? I would argue that it doesnt, that the group consideration is different since now you also have...
Sure, lets say that all moral due diligence is done in that scenario, so as you laid it out that act is justified morally, it is good for the individu...
That book is very similar to what you’ve talked about so far. You are operating around one of the “peeks” of the moral landscape, you just do mot real...
Ok, so your central claim seems to be that what is good for the individual is whats good for the group aa long as the good is defined as not doing har...
Well Im not sure how that would change that there are exceptions to your claim that haven't been accounted for. How exactly do you mean objectively va...
P1 is not true at all. Many large groups of humans value things that are not beneficial to all humanity. Its arguable humanity as a whole doesnt value...
Your conclusion should be that unsupported belief has a high probability of being less valuable to humanity (where chaotic consequences are bad for hu...
Yes yes, :100: , but that doesnt matter to Frank Apisa, and even if it did he lacks the comprehension to accept he is wrong on this. He is a fanatical...
Well its a broad term that you are incorrectly using specifically. Like in my human/doctor analogy. Anyway, you’ve jumped to the word irreligious now,...
I get that, but so what? Whats the relevance of whether I agree with the first sentence in someone else's post? I actually think there are a lot off e...
No, polytheist and pantheist are types of theism so that wouldnt make any sense. Im not sure, but I would guess there are words for animosity towards ...
“irreligious” includes opposing religion, not knowing religion and not choosing a religion. Its not specific to opposing religion, the same way the wo...
Well those are idiosyncratic definitions of anti-theism and irreligion, but ok. So “anti-theism” is only opposed to theistic beliefs when its “atheism...
I dont know if we are talking past each other or what...lets start from the beginning. Atheism is about whether or not god exists, anti-theism is abou...
Right, we are discussing where we disagree. I directly addressed what you said and then pointed out how your rebuttals failed. If I got something wron...
I didnt see that, did you add it after the initial post to Fool? i didnt get an alert to that one. Ok, so yes I disagree. First, anti-theism is not al...
I waa referencing my first post that disagreed an anti theist must be an atheist as well. Then you made a second post to Fool which I agreed with but ...
This I agree with, the two words do not mean the same thing. Anti-theism is pretty clearly about religion and ideology surrounding god, not the existe...
Not sure I agree with you here, one could be an anti-theist but not an atheist. One could believe in god and hate/resent god for his biblical acts and...
I do not think you can define evil by itself, I think you need to define what is evil and what is good at the same time, as one is meaningless without...
There is something very confusing about the way you are framing this. Baden gave you everything you need to answer your question, the terms you are as...
Well ya, the memory wipe is removing the experience and the experience is what makes the thing worthwhile. However, this scenario does nothing to make...
The end of life is arbitrary? Seems pretty cut and dry to me, you read the book and it ends when your done reading, you live the life and it ends when...
I dont think that makes sense. If you swap out life for other things your logic doesnt seem to hold, and so you would need to show why life in particu...
Amen Sushi. Unfortunately the TDS is going to get worse before it gets better. (On both sides btw, I see TDS on both sides, constantly.) There is stil...
See it really seems like a blind spot for you, and Im not trying to be a prick. Im a Trumpist?! I imagine we mostly agree on what kind of character th...
Non-sequitor, i was providing an example of news spreading falsehoods about Trump not a reference to Trumps character. Im not rejecting anything as ra...
It only seems like a double standard because of your low reading comprehension. Ive already explained this failure on your part but evidently you didn...
Not offhand no, it was a story about how that audio was an admission of guilt for sexual assault and I saw it referenced elsewhere (re-reported). Sorr...
If at any time they didn't play that important part of the recording for context it was a falsehood. It gives the condemnable words context, and witho...
You asked for an example of him being misrepresented in the news, which I provided. Whether it fits an overall narrative about Trump is another matter...
A good example is “pussygate”. I felt like the incident was pretty thoroughly misreported on CNN and most other media. First, they left out what proce...
In my experience its about the same, the fringe on both sides unless you include the media and even then the anti-trump or pro trump media both equall...
Comments