You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

khaled

Comments

I don’t know and I don’t care enough to find out.
August 24, 2019 at 06:55
Well those same gurus also speak of ego death when you’ve been still enough for long enough so maybe the concepts aren’t that far apart
August 24, 2019 at 05:13
zero or negative sum = bad. I’d say life is a negative sum game for most. You have to be really lucky for it not to be. And if you somehow knew it wou...
August 24, 2019 at 05:10
Why? It makes perfect sense to me. Is it good to create new people that are happy? No it isn’t. It is expected. Creating the problem of happiness/suff...
August 24, 2019 at 05:08
It’s 4am here and I haven’t slept so I’ll say this real quick. Although standard deviation and mean are very easy concepts you can look up in a minute...
August 23, 2019 at 19:38
And if they hadn’t? Why take the risk? Also everything you said doesn’t stop you from being a hypocrite still It doesn’t matter what you think of mean...
August 23, 2019 at 19:34
A more risky situation simply means much more pleasure/pain is at stake. Just because more pleasure is at stake doesn’t make it a benefit. Ex: going t...
August 23, 2019 at 19:25
Indeed it does. Because it has all the properties of a problem. If you don’t solve it you suffer. Simple as that. Heck you don’t have to take my word ...
August 23, 2019 at 19:18
Consistency. Name one other situation in which putting someone in a risky situation (high risk of pleasure and high risk of pain) from a less risky si...
August 23, 2019 at 14:36
You can't do it in a moral way. We would have to completely nuke every part of the earth and make it uninhabitable for all life forever. Also yes, ant...
August 23, 2019 at 06:52
It doesn't matter what the living view life to be. Not all antinatalists view life as "full of suffering" or terrible in every way. We just like to be...
August 23, 2019 at 06:38
I don't think you read any argument any of us have presented here because none of them work backwards. I would like you to demonstrate how this argume...
August 23, 2019 at 06:36
How does AI work? How does a computer program determine which calculations to do? Prebuild instructions in the case of no free will. No? Where do you ...
August 20, 2019 at 14:30
I think the differences between us and an alien civ can be so vast that making predictions like these would be completely meaningless no offence
August 19, 2019 at 12:11
I agree. The person I was asking to define this third category of causality called "free" didn't. I agree I think it's more than that. It wasn't on th...
August 19, 2019 at 12:10
Ok. I think you're defining free will differently from most on this thread. Because most people I've talked to so far do not contend with "random" as ...
August 19, 2019 at 12:02
I never heard "freedom" and "randomness" called synonyms before
August 19, 2019 at 11:58
Shouldn't you just call it "randomness" then? It seems to me you literally just defined randomness. (Also I don't know why you talk as if every time I...
August 19, 2019 at 11:56
Yes I'm asking in what cirumstances. So epistemically random counts?
August 19, 2019 at 11:55
When does freedom occur? (Did I ask this before, I feel like I have)
August 19, 2019 at 11:49
So why didn't he. Did he choose A because of it having more justification? But then he couldn't have picked B, because A would have still had more jus...
August 19, 2019 at 11:47
If it's a subset of physical functions and those physical functions are either deterministic or random then where is the free will? probably better on...
August 19, 2019 at 11:44
Is this a Daniel Dennett thing?
August 19, 2019 at 11:21
Really? If S believed A has more justification than B could S pick B? How in the world does justification not have anything to do with real options.
August 19, 2019 at 11:20
That.... Doesn't asnwer my question.
August 19, 2019 at 11:16
If you CAN show the causal chain then the mind isn't involved. Unless the "mind" is a literal muscle or neuron. No I'm not but I agree it would be a m...
August 19, 2019 at 11:16
So if the justification for A completely rules out B could the person have picked B?
August 19, 2019 at 11:11
Yes. You can't know it is impossible to causally peg the physical sound to physical reactions You seem to have completely missed the remainder of the ...
August 19, 2019 at 11:10
Yes it was I never said equal
August 19, 2019 at 11:08
Neurology. Sounds are physical, neurolgical reactions to them are physical Why are they incorrect. You can't say with absolute certainty that we won't...
August 19, 2019 at 11:07
Ok then. Assume you thought of justifications for two options A and B and then picked B. Why didn't you pick A? Would presenting justifications for B ...
August 19, 2019 at 11:03
And you assume that would be easy to do in the case of the trigger pulling and very difficult in the case of hate speech right? What I'm showing here ...
August 19, 2019 at 11:02
How can justification "not exist".
August 19, 2019 at 11:00
And if someone claims that murdering someone is causally peggable to hate speech why would they be wrong? In both cases the result isn't necessarily c...
August 19, 2019 at 10:58
You could have picked the other option yes? So if you had picked the other option and I asked you for "why didn't you pick the first" You'd have justi...
August 19, 2019 at 10:56
Ah sorry nevermind. I don't get why you have to be a prick about it. But no we don't know it causes them to die when it does because sometimes the tri...
August 19, 2019 at 10:55
Assume you're picking between two close options.
August 19, 2019 at 10:54
When what "does"?
August 19, 2019 at 10:53
Ok. You can reword that in there and it'll still make sense Because the other option also has justification that could have been used. That doesn't te...
August 19, 2019 at 10:51
We konw, confirmed by empirical observation, that any pulling of the trigger of a loaded gun that is pointing at someone doesn't cause anyone to die, ...
August 19, 2019 at 10:48
You took it from there and I assumed you had read our conversation beforehand You could go back and read it but I'll try to put it in as few words as ...
August 19, 2019 at 10:38
You replied to me talking to someone else. I introduced the idea that the decision to bias a decision is random there. You didn't say it I did.
August 19, 2019 at 10:28
You don't need to defend NOT believing in something.
August 19, 2019 at 10:26
But the decision to bias or not to bias is itself completely random. I never implied there is only 50/50 random and determined.
August 19, 2019 at 10:23
I hope so. That's what I kept referring to when I said true randomness. Randomness that is not an approximation due to our lack of knowledge
August 19, 2019 at 10:23
The best definition I could come up with is answering the question "what exists" using the most abstract categories possible
August 18, 2019 at 04:56
I don't know. That's what I'm asking people who argue for free will. I don't get the concept of "free" and I need them to explain it to me in a way th...
August 18, 2019 at 04:52
Here you said a free choice CAN be a random choice. Which I took to mean it can also be deterministic. So for you, a completely random choice is free ...
August 17, 2019 at 12:34
so: choice made = free choice?
August 17, 2019 at 11:43
so a free choice is: the random choice I made?
August 17, 2019 at 11:06