You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

sime

Comments

Beliefs cannot be real properties of brains, because the notion of epistemic-error is under-determined with respect to the neurological and physical f...
December 16, 2021 at 23:09
Anyone claiming that science can solve or dissolve the hard-problem, is not only wrong, but demonstrates a profound misunderstanding of the nature and...
December 12, 2021 at 12:43
Then why not commit to direct perceptual access of vague objects?
December 11, 2021 at 20:47
You can't avoid the implied subjective idealism, but naturalised science can at least accommodate the paradox via the adoption of an irrealist stance;...
December 11, 2021 at 18:57
One of philosophy's greatest mysteries, even more mysterious than the hard problem, is the mystery of how Daniel Dennett ascended to prominence in ang...
December 11, 2021 at 13:25
I suspect "I believe X" causes grammatical disagreements and confusion due to the fact that it can be used to mean ?"X is more likely true than false"...
December 11, 2021 at 12:45
Ultimately, what Gettier overlooks is the perspectival nature of belief and knowledge, namely the fact that the intentional object of a judgement cann...
December 11, 2021 at 09:03
That's where we disagree then. If someone other than myself claims to 'know' something, I can't interpret their use of the word as making transcendent...
December 10, 2021 at 19:32
But is my belief wrong from my perspective given that my use of "to know" hasn't changed, or only wrong from the mods perspective?
December 10, 2021 at 19:18
Suppose i assert "I know that it's raining because I am experiencing rain and that this fact coheres with everything else that i know". But suppose th...
December 10, 2021 at 18:56
A good introduction is Judea Pearl's "Introduction to Causal Inference". The lesson is that causal implications cannot be derived from a statistical m...
December 10, 2021 at 18:34
As we are both not john, we can both agree that John's beliefs doesn't equal the truth, but that doesn't give John the epistemic warrant to know that ...
December 10, 2021 at 18:15
If you understand my point of view, then we might be talking apples and oranges with you playing the game of arguing within accepted philosophical con...
December 10, 2021 at 16:37
If you say "It is raining", i cannot interpret you as saying anything other than " Michael believes it is raining". And if i notice that it isn't rain...
December 10, 2021 at 15:03
Every assertion has a cause. In your view, is it possible to grasp the meaning of an assertion without understanding the cause of the assertion?
December 10, 2021 at 14:35
So according to us? See my last example.
December 10, 2021 at 14:22
An independent fact according to whom?
December 10, 2021 at 14:20
If 3) refers to your belief that it is raining, then I would say, by appealing to the meaningless of Moore's Sentence, that : John doesn't know that i...
December 10, 2021 at 14:07
It is obviously that case that you aren't necessarily willing to presently assert your previous beliefs, or to presently assert my present beliefs. Th...
December 10, 2021 at 13:04
I'm trying to understand how you distinguish your concept of your beliefs from your concept of reality.
December 10, 2021 at 12:55
So what are you willing to assert about the present, that you don't presently believe?
December 10, 2021 at 12:53
That's understandable, due to historical disagreements and confusion in science as to how to formulate the notion, but things have rapidly changed in ...
December 10, 2021 at 10:04
I dislike the word "hard", for it seems to encourage an inaccurate association of pain and struggle with respect to the "hard" objective concerned, le...
December 10, 2021 at 08:56
I hazard a guess that magick is another word for affirmations.
December 09, 2021 at 10:38
Oppeheimer would be the distal cause of the explosion, as described by transitivity. And the role of U-235 might also be relegated to that of a distal...
December 09, 2021 at 09:03
The study of transitive relations is otherwise known as Order Theory. A model of Causation without transitivity would essentially amount to a set of u...
December 08, 2021 at 18:18
Why is it necessary to believe that a flipped coin assumes a definite state of affairs before checking? This assumption only appears to be necessary r...
December 08, 2021 at 13:01
I like the brash and provocative title. As to your underlying views, they sound faintly reminiscent of Leo Strauss. What is your understanding of the ...
December 08, 2021 at 10:24
I'm inclined to reject the idea that truth is a predicate for similar reasons as to why Frege, Hume and Kant rejected the idea of existence as a predi...
December 07, 2021 at 00:33
"The visual data is believed to be consistent with the existence of a cow, relative to the present state of the observer that summarises the reliabili...
December 06, 2021 at 18:17
I roughly concur; although by "trail" i wasn't necessarily implying a man-made trail. Tea leaf patterns at the bottom of a cup would suffice as an exa...
November 05, 2021 at 13:39
Is a trail with a fork ( ---< ) vague or ambiguous? If one intends to use the trail as a path to a destination in mind, then the trail is ambiguous. I...
November 05, 2021 at 09:12
Constructively, the implications of the incompleteness theorems are stronger than that. The consistency of certain systems (PA and the like) cannot be...
October 14, 2021 at 15:13
Recall that Peano arithmetic might turn out to be inconsistent. In which case, an application of a deductive system based on such arithmetic might res...
October 12, 2021 at 17:54
Apples and Oranges. Both Turing and Wittgenstein understood that sufficiently complex formal systems (.e.g Peano arithmetic) cannot be known to be con...
October 12, 2021 at 14:37
I've only skim read the above article, so correct me of i'm wrong, but i'm of the impression that Dummett (according to Devitt) is equating, or maybe ...
October 10, 2021 at 11:17
In: Realism  — view comment
One issue that tends to get overlooked with anti-realism, is that it is consistent for a person to assert anti-realism for himself, but to assert real...
October 08, 2021 at 13:48
In: Realism  — view comment
In my view there's nothing naive about 'naive anti-realism', so it doesn't need moderation. So-called moderate anti-realism is either a generalized fo...
October 07, 2021 at 17:56
Doesn't your timestamp proposal amount to fitting experience to theory, rather than vice versa? I used to have similar thoughts when contemplating McT...
October 04, 2021 at 08:19
Q. "A cognition-invariant, involuntary resistance to ineluctable facts of the matter." A. What are "percepts"? — George Berkeley plays Jeopardy
October 03, 2021 at 14:30
A definition of realism is a contradiction in terms, for the ultimate purpose of any definition is to reduce theoretical nomenclature to observations ...
October 03, 2021 at 12:20
In: Realism  — view comment
If a self-described realist claims to be making a metaphysical assertion founded upon reason, and if he accepts that the tribunal of reason are his ex...
October 03, 2021 at 09:34
In what senses, if any, is the following thought empirically meaningful? : "my present experience is different from my previous experience" Suppose th...
September 29, 2021 at 20:32
Yes, as was Wittgenstein throughout his entire career. I would first suggest reading Bertrand Russell's Analysis of Mind. Without reading this book, i...
September 24, 2021 at 10:43
Determinism and non-determinism aren't real properties of the universe, for as demonstrated with the Middle-Earth fictional universe, these terms have...
September 23, 2021 at 08:49
In Automata Theory, non-determinism is the existence of two applicable state-transitions from a given state. This isn't an epistemic notion.
September 22, 2021 at 21:21
The author JR Tolkien determined what happened in the world of Middle-Earth, but he didn't specify what would have happened in the story if alternativ...
September 22, 2021 at 19:34
I was responding to the common belief that chance represents ignorance. We know from experience that the odds for a "fair die" landing on any side, if...
September 22, 2021 at 17:31
It is saying that the physical propensity for obtaining the respective possible outcome, is above zero and less than 1. Without additional information...
September 22, 2021 at 13:10
It is imprecise because probability intervals are assigned to outcomes, rather than numbers. e.g. P ( dice throw = six) = (0,1) Which only express the...
September 22, 2021 at 12:51