You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

SophistiCat

Comments

Sorry I was a little snippy in my response. That free will is undermined by a deterministic universe is an old and perfectly respectable philosophical...
July 09, 2019 at 06:40
Well, there is this position, to which I am somewhat sympathetic, that the abstract (mathematical) entities that we find to be indispensable in explai...
July 08, 2019 at 07:03
You are not answering the question. You don't need to tell me about how you think free will does not exist because I've heard this a thousand times, a...
July 07, 2019 at 21:12
Gotcha. Yes, it's a good question. But I would like to turn it around: What would a real, non-illusory free will be like? In what way would it be diff...
July 07, 2019 at 19:27
Have you tried the search function?
July 07, 2019 at 19:10
Yes, and thank you for a comprehensive response. Oh but I don't think that we derive the concept of time from the clock. From the moment of the first ...
July 02, 2019 at 05:23
Again, I am at a loss as to what occasioned your ridicule. Do you think that in order to understand the authors' point here, one needs to have studied...
July 02, 2019 at 04:28
Yes, exactly, clocks (periodic processes) don't define time in the way definitions usually work, i.e. by completely reducing one concept to one or mor...
June 30, 2019 at 18:51
I don't know that having at least heard of Aquinas' Five Ways constitutes "technical background knowledge," but fine, let's assume that some readers d...
June 30, 2019 at 18:12
Honestly, I have no idea what you are talking about. Technical terms? What technical terms? Here is the sentence again: "The first three of Aquinas's ...
June 30, 2019 at 11:41
Perhaps we've been reading different articles, because my impression of the SEP is the exact opposite. I am a consummate layman: never took a philosop...
June 29, 2019 at 21:14
Location in what?
June 29, 2019 at 20:47
I mean what was referred to in those days as the First World - North America, Western Europe, Japan, Australia. The liberal democratic order in those ...
June 29, 2019 at 16:01
I wonder whether a few decades from now, the post-war Western liberal democratic order will come to be seen as an aberration, or yet another passing p...
June 29, 2019 at 14:14
I think you have it a little backwards. We should think of time in relation to physical "clocks," such as heartbeats, diurnal cycles, pendulums or ele...
June 29, 2019 at 10:37
Did you read this in Wikipedia Argument from analogy perhaps? Perhaps it may help to think of a property of P as any predicate applied to P: P is red ...
June 29, 2019 at 08:34
I think that this line of thought is psychologically naive. No, perceptions, thoughts, a certain order and hierarchy of our mental architecture - thes...
June 27, 2019 at 08:21
An ethical system is typically named after its core value. The core value of humanism is the human being. If they are basing this value on something e...
June 24, 2019 at 06:53
You are making it sound like cooperative behavior is motivated entirely by self-interest, which just isn't true. I don't even care to argue the point,...
June 23, 2019 at 21:29
But where are you getting the idea that humanists are basing their ideology on evolution (thereby committing the naturalistic fallacy)? This is not a ...
June 23, 2019 at 21:16
@"fdrake" pointed that out back on page one. Of course, the matter is not so cut and dried as to be dismissed out of hand, as evidenced by decades of ...
June 21, 2019 at 06:56
Dennett's objection is to reflexive ontologizing of naive psychological notions of subjectivity. In the linked essay he gives a quote of Searle (also ...
June 17, 2019 at 22:00
This is a caricature of Dennett's position. Dennett does not say that conscious experience is an illusion, in the sense of being unreal. He is saying ...
June 17, 2019 at 07:02
You have never read either Homer or Virgil, have you? You got it exactly backwards. Virgil takes up the Trojans' narrative (for obvious reasons), and ...
June 02, 2019 at 09:58
Two cells are not identical to one cell. So you can run the same argument in that case as well: one cell has a property that two cells lack: its numer...
May 30, 2019 at 13:46
You've posted the exact same argument before. You didn't get much of a discussion, because the idea is trivial and there is not much to discuss. If A ...
May 30, 2019 at 07:28
You cannot put the blame on polls for not getting the result right a year or two before the event. What do you think pollsters are - oracles? How woul...
May 29, 2019 at 06:31
Though in general I dislike the idea, sometimes I do wish for an upvote button.
May 28, 2019 at 22:20
There are a few common responses to such challenges. One is to bite the bullet and deny free will. This is a very common response among amateur philos...
May 28, 2019 at 22:11
Right, but still, we, with our macroscopic sense organs, would never know about quantum effects if they did not propagate to our scale. So although th...
May 28, 2019 at 07:17
How would macro-level indeterminism help? It wouldn't give you any control - on the contrary, it would make your actions erratic, out-of-control. Your...
May 27, 2019 at 21:53
I don't see a line of reasoning here. You just make statements to the effect that determinism is the case "in your mind" and leave it at that, without...
May 27, 2019 at 07:36
What is irrational is this argument from ignorance. No rational conclusion can follow from "I haven't a fucking clue."
May 27, 2019 at 07:31
Well, facts and figures are obviously of no help to you - that was my point. When the margin of victory is as thin as that, margins of error will come...
May 26, 2019 at 21:21
Please explain how the polls were a failure. Preferably with facts and figures.
May 26, 2019 at 14:12
I just looked it up: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opinion_polling_for_the_2019_Australian_federal_election Both polling results and election results ...
May 26, 2019 at 10:45
Some sort of empirically informed analysis, not just your say-so. But you have already dismissed science and philosophical analysis as suitable tools,...
May 23, 2019 at 20:56
You haven't "SHOWN" either the science or the logic. In my very first response in this thread I advised you to have a closer look at the science of co...
May 22, 2019 at 17:21
You were the one that went "down a sidebar about epiphenomenalism" when I challenged you on your assertions. Now you got cold feet and doubled down on...
May 21, 2019 at 19:39
Oh so epiphenomenalism is what you were about all this time? Well, dualism is not the only alternative to epiphenomenalism. Indeed, I don't think dual...
May 21, 2019 at 07:01
That's not proof - that's just the same baseless assertion.
May 20, 2019 at 21:13
These are nothing but bland assertions. How do you know that human-like intelligence can go without consciousness? Why is it absurd to suppose that an...
May 19, 2019 at 20:39
I am by no means an expert on Hume, but I don't think this is true. Where does he say this?
May 16, 2019 at 07:54
As you can see, Hume didn't say anything of the sort. His thesis is that we can never demonstrate the existence of a cause. Again, Hume wrote about hu...
May 16, 2019 at 07:34
There is an even more basic method of reproduction, and that is what a lot of origin of life research focuses on: self-replicating molecules, which ar...
May 15, 2019 at 11:39
On the contrary, Hume appeared to support the notion of a necessary connection between events in nature. All that he said about uncertainty and probab...
May 15, 2019 at 07:10
Context and history do matter; the phrase "all men are created equal" is too ambiguous otherwise. You can speculate all day what it means to be "equal...
May 15, 2019 at 06:40
No. You don't even need to develop AI in order to have a computer that can solve certain problems as well as or better than people can - that's what c...
May 15, 2019 at 06:31
It is stupid. Again, I have to ask, do you have any idea about the context and the history of the phrase? Any idea at all? If you don't then the obvio...
May 14, 2019 at 21:02
That's another glib statement that doesn't help the discussion. Sure, science doesn't know everything there is to know about consciousness, but who do...
May 14, 2019 at 17:26