You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

schopenhauer1

Comments

You are still starting with the same set of conditions. Your development as a physical being relies on the initial template and the development that e...
December 15, 2023 at 18:41
I think "meaning of life" questions become unnecessarily rooted in these historic questions of religion and science. I think when answering this quest...
December 15, 2023 at 16:52
One of the things I hate in these debates is when people don’t acknowledge what was already acknowledged. Please look back to my posts above about sci...
December 15, 2023 at 15:24
No, twin studies don't negate necessity, but sufficiency (perhaps). That person would not be that person at some level without the gametes that they w...
December 15, 2023 at 03:19
So also like @"unenlightened" you (willfully?) ignored this: Especially please pay attention to the necessary but not sufficient part. And yeah I also...
December 14, 2023 at 23:06
Oh by the way, what I am discussing versus a specific identity versus a general future event, is not so indirectly related to this passage in Ryle:
December 14, 2023 at 22:51
Not quite catching what you are saying, but it may have been addressed in my post here: https://thephilosophyforum.com/discussion/comment/861568
December 14, 2023 at 22:39
:up: Yes, I think it's actually quite easy to do to say, "Oh wouldn't be weird if I grew up in this or that place, time, or otherwise." And it can be ...
December 14, 2023 at 22:34
:up: Indeed. But I suspect people who don't necessarily believe in a theory of a transposable "soul" into different physical bodies, STILL TALK AS IF ...
December 14, 2023 at 22:30
I realize one can go on a wacky crusade of exceptions and give me some interesting sci-fi scenarios along the lines of a Ship of Theseus whereby someo...
December 14, 2023 at 22:21
Why say it's nonsense? Why can't what I say achieve agreement? This is perplexing. And why the overall vitriolic response? This is poisoning the well,...
December 14, 2023 at 22:16
So all of this is not addressing my point which is that genetic identity (same sperm and egg made you who you are) is NECESSARY even if NOT sufficient...
December 14, 2023 at 21:01
You don't even need to speculate about that. Psychosomatic diseases can already impair someone this way so that at one point they are lucid and at ano...
December 14, 2023 at 20:59
So, I see you didn't pay close attention to some of my OP. I said here:
December 14, 2023 at 20:57
I'm just waiting for @"Ludwig V" to have some sort of counter to this seemingly factual understanding of how identity works.
December 14, 2023 at 19:59
Not quite sure what you are saying but if you are asking why this discounts a lot of counterfactuals about things like, "What if I was born a...".. Th...
December 14, 2023 at 19:56
@"Ludwig V" here's your separate thread on the topic of identity and conception.
December 14, 2023 at 17:36
It looks like you didn't read this part here: But yeah, I'll start a new thread then.
December 14, 2023 at 17:28
Well, you are slightly moving the goal post. All I am establishing is that if the gametes are different than the one that was your set of gametes, wha...
December 14, 2023 at 15:07
Sure, if you’re getting caught on conception versus birth, we can say, is going to be a different person once born. That isn’t the substantive issue a...
December 14, 2023 at 12:29
Because you haven't seemed to grasp the main point of my argument which is that if a set of parents, even your own, had two gametes that were differen...
December 13, 2023 at 23:21
How do your examples address what you just quoted?
December 13, 2023 at 19:40
I actually think I'm in agreement. So, I think you are again misconstruing what this claim is saying. Can you explain exactly where the breakdown is? ...
December 13, 2023 at 15:51
I don't think you're quite getting my argument. I am saying that it is a sort of contradiction (as implied by Ryle as well I think), to talk about YOU...
December 13, 2023 at 02:46
How do minor variations not make a difference? Certainly if the event of your parents conceiving 5 minutes earlier or later happened, a different set ...
December 12, 2023 at 20:32
So my point is that "you" would not be "you" in any altered history of causation leading to "who" you are. You mentioned being born in a different cou...
December 12, 2023 at 15:41
I think it’s a huge issue and opens a can of worms but, I don’t see how you can defend a claim that if you were born in different “circumstances”, the...
December 11, 2023 at 23:31
No problem, did you see my post on lecture 2 above?
December 11, 2023 at 22:39
Should be rejection OF understanding... The way I interpret his "Cartesian" rejection, is that he is rejecting that subjective experiences as somethin...
December 11, 2023 at 17:53
:lol: Yes, agreed with Dennett. I don't think it's totally disconnected from Ryle (perhaps in these lectures more so). Rather, if Ryle is against Cart...
December 11, 2023 at 15:17
@"Ludwig V" Ryle's idea of logical consequences and practical inescapability reminds me of other distinctions made in determining principles of suffic...
December 11, 2023 at 15:08
Why do some of these philosophers have a hard time with the idea of imaginary concepts? A bald king of France drives them crazy. There does not exist ...
December 11, 2023 at 12:22
Ryle influenced Dennett who is a part of the "eliminativist materialism" notion. According to IEP: So I guess, if you can't explain it, eliminate it. ...
December 11, 2023 at 03:55
That's my point! Paganism would have allowed for any number of pluralistic beliefs to flourish, just as the Germanic kingdoms of what became France, S...
December 11, 2023 at 03:36
The idea that mental activity is somehow behavioral dispositions seems incoherent to me. And somehow trying to save this view by pointing to how quali...
December 10, 2023 at 11:31
Look all you need to do is hold the view that sounds most common sensical, make a few quips showing your indignation at the silliness that doesn’t rep...
December 09, 2023 at 19:11
So it does bring up an interesting point. I think "higher cultures", meaning, "advanced technology, philosophical inquiry, etc." can indeed go with pa...
December 09, 2023 at 17:15
Eh, you did answer the question, but I think this is a slight cop-out. Arguably, Islam's mishmash of pagan Arabic culture fused with the Judeo-Christi...
December 09, 2023 at 01:38
True, but then you are ignoring that I acknowledged the basic independence and "late to the game" aspect of Viking society. By that time, feudalism di...
December 08, 2023 at 22:06
True, so this would more apply to the regions inside the Roman Empire like Italia, Hispaniola, Illyricum, Graecia, Byzantium, etc. As you stated well ...
December 08, 2023 at 15:32
Added a bit more.
December 07, 2023 at 15:48
Legitimate historical question that is quite complicated... When studying Germanic tribes during the late Roman Empire and early Middle Ages, the char...
December 07, 2023 at 15:33
For a brief period right after the American Revolution, there was an even more extreme "states rights" federal document called the Articles of Confede...
December 06, 2023 at 23:27
No response here? Or was it pretty comprehensive? :smile: https://thephilosophyforum.com/discussion/comment/858550
December 06, 2023 at 17:36
Antinatalism largely answers this dilemma of putting people into a world where they must subsist, often against what would be the conditions and range...
December 06, 2023 at 17:33
Well yeah, I didn't make a claim it is exactly the same as English, just that they are derived from the same set of ideas. Clearly, the USA is more de...
December 05, 2023 at 22:44
So I see "conceptual schemes" in Philosophy of Language, as applying Kuhn's theory meant for paradigms in the history of sciences (and science in gene...
December 05, 2023 at 22:40
I’m sorry but you haven’t established why the basis of the American political system is not specifically connected to English and broadly European his...
December 05, 2023 at 21:00
I'd also like to mention there is perhaps an inner tension already from analytic philosophy from the start, especially with "logical positivism". The ...
December 05, 2023 at 19:25
I think I largely agree with all you stated there. I just want to emphasize that indeed, if discussion circles around neologisms like "language games"...
December 05, 2023 at 19:13