You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

schopenhauer1

Comments

I agree. Since this is more of an announcement, like "hey look at this", and not meant as a platform for debate, it should go in the Lounge.
February 09, 2019 at 21:07
I just thought it was relevant in the fact that what seems like an obscure, specifically philosophical position, has gotten a lot of attention recentl...
February 09, 2019 at 20:57
@"Banno" Oh that won't work as far as my definition of moral good getting passed the open argument.
February 06, 2019 at 15:18
I explained in the other thread that being used as a source of labor is a harm to the individual. All economic systems will eventually do this by de f...
February 06, 2019 at 05:16
Can good just be deflated a principle of "non-harm" and "helping others" on one hand and some sort of "happiness principle" on the other? For example,...
February 06, 2019 at 00:02
Actually @"Andrew4Handel" had some good explanations but the one's I listed were: Being used as a source of labor by society and if it is work an indi...
February 05, 2019 at 23:38
I don't believe in true romantic love. By keep I meant, that we sustain- as in a long-term relationship for many many years, not just a fling or a sho...
February 05, 2019 at 16:00
You either misinterpreted what I meant or you are creating a strawman, as I never mentioned genetics as a result of bad parenting situations and foste...
February 04, 2019 at 12:40
I think people should explore the stochastic nature of who gets love and who doesn't. One obvious way is how children can be born to parents that show...
February 04, 2019 at 04:20
Yes I noticed this. I think Moore’s big takeaway is that morality can never be explained by other terms as there is nothing that proves the goodness o...
February 04, 2019 at 02:36
Moore thought that the concept "good" could not be defined in a subject-predicate way. In other words, good itself could not be explained with other d...
February 03, 2019 at 21:12
Correct Correct Well, this is to deny that I mentioned that DE FACTO we must rely on the economic system, or to arbitrarily repeat the point? This wou...
January 29, 2019 at 17:09
Hello Bliss, it looks like you are new to posting in the forum. My take on this is to not have children. Do not throw more people into the economic sy...
January 29, 2019 at 13:06
Selfish in thinking that the world revolves around their needs only. I guess egoistic maybe. Impatience is a large component but it is also simply not...
January 28, 2019 at 13:45
Granted. Children can be empathetic, but on the whole their tendencies tend to be on the "me, now" scale. Patience, self-control, etc. has to be taugh...
January 28, 2019 at 13:37
Of course, my position is to spare children the drudgeries and punishment of existence by not having them in the first place, but that is a completely...
January 28, 2019 at 13:34
Children are the hardest population to work with because of underdeveloped social reasoning. They tend to be selfish little people. The parent and oth...
January 28, 2019 at 13:24
@"Bitter Crank" The first punishment was being born into existence. :gasp: But once born, what to do now? Certainly youth need some sort of consequenc...
January 26, 2019 at 18:19
Procreation is ultimately the arbiter of the existential pile, hence my focus on it. Everything else is stemming the damage done. Now comes this organ...
January 25, 2019 at 16:53
Well, I guess if Schopenhauer had his cherished poodle...
January 25, 2019 at 14:20
No doubt, giving to fellow humans out of pure compassion is something. Schopenhauer discussed it as the root of true morality. What you describe is al...
January 24, 2019 at 22:21
I like this. Well said. :up:
January 24, 2019 at 22:17
But that’s the attitude change. If it’s a choice, what does it mean to choose society’s need for production? At the end of the day that’s what I’m cho...
January 24, 2019 at 19:52
What am Insaving and why? The materialist conception seems to be the social reality. Charity is just one part of it if that’s what you’re referring to...
January 24, 2019 at 19:49
I just don't buy into the idea that the individual must change his/her attitude. The fact that one can even "choose" to do so means that this is not t...
January 24, 2019 at 17:52
@"Wallows"@"Bitter Crank"@"andrewk"@"Noah Te Stroete"@"unenlightened" What does one do when one is born but doesn't want to do what is required of bei...
January 24, 2019 at 15:20
I refer you to @"Banno".
January 23, 2019 at 14:21
In: Monism  — view comment
This doesn't seem to answer the hard question of consciousness. We are always stuck with a thing leftover. Does a baby have raw experiences of qualia ...
January 22, 2019 at 07:57
Here is a large crux of the situation, perhaps. What is this 8 hour work day? Who does it really benefit? This is circular reasoning. We have simply d...
January 22, 2019 at 07:43
It is not a hindrance to philosophy. To the contrary, it helps inform it. As Camus stated, There is but one truly serious philosophical problem and th...
January 20, 2019 at 21:04
In: Monism  — view comment
@"csalisbury" Why would there not just be a strict dualism then? This might be the way we are using language but if there is the One and there is illu...
January 20, 2019 at 19:02
Yes, but did Kant himself think that "one simple unity" was empirical? I think to him, numbers themselves and counting were all a priori, though possi...
January 16, 2019 at 13:31
Yes, I think this exercise is kind of proving that out. The fuzziness between what counts as analytic or synthetic in the definition of gold, for exam...
January 16, 2019 at 12:25
Yes, I didn't mean that Kant didn't think a priori to be necessary. I just meant that being necessary isn't a fully sufficient definition of a priori.
January 16, 2019 at 12:13
I think these are great questions and pretty much sums up this whole debate. In order for any of this to work we have to have some basic terms that we...
January 16, 2019 at 03:58
Kripke was concerned with names. That is the main point we must not forget with him. His question is, "How do proper names and natural kinds designate...
January 16, 2019 at 01:50
I guess the point is- what makes gold essentially gold? Is it its yellowness? But, I see where you are coming from using Kant's own theory of categori...
January 15, 2019 at 23:22
Emphasis on the S.
January 15, 2019 at 22:43
I meant this particular discussion to be more of a quick one-liner to Bitter Crank..but I see I now have to put my dukes up.. I'll try to put the effo...
January 15, 2019 at 22:34
No I don't. I certainly don't think that yellow is necessarily wrapped up in the meaning of gold, in the same way that bachelors is literally the defi...
January 15, 2019 at 22:04
To the contrary, the world is pretty darn complicated, based on many levels of socio-economic realities and parties. Your desires and wants cause othe...
January 15, 2019 at 21:47
Cool. Thank you. I think it was, especially keeping in mind the definition of analyticity and with Kripke's further critique using modal logic. Howeve...
January 15, 2019 at 21:38
One of the reasons being born is bad is that everyone is being used. It is the premise of life. Your pain is on top of the fact that your work is need...
January 15, 2019 at 17:46
@"Banno" I'd be willing to append my first statement above that they are incommensurable if, we consider that Kripke's project was more than grammatic...
January 15, 2019 at 08:15
I would agree with Kripke's assessment. But, I think Kant just missapplied gold when judging with this own theory. Gold being yellow is a posteriori, ...
January 15, 2019 at 07:46
I hate to smuggle in words where they were not explicitly stated but to get your point across to those who don't get Kripke and his idea of natural ki...
January 15, 2019 at 03:07
tim wood, queston: What do you suppose a statement is about gold that is synthetic a priori?
January 15, 2019 at 02:46
I'm going to let @"Banno" answer that since he brought it up in this thread and had the disagreement with @"tim wood". I just saw that there might nee...
January 13, 2019 at 03:02
Yes, and so is Kripke :smile: .
January 13, 2019 at 02:57
Same name, different identity, but the name is fixed to the identity in all possible worlds. Perhaps we cannot get the essential property of the other...
January 13, 2019 at 02:53