You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Dfpolis

Comments

I accept that that is your faith position. Thanks for sharing.
August 13, 2018 at 18:01
Scattering light and attracting bodies gravitationally are actions.
August 13, 2018 at 17:59
Anything not composed of material constituents. Either consciousness is made of matter or it is immaterial. If consciousness is made of matter, then i...
August 13, 2018 at 17:57
There is no problem with my definition. I am not denying that "logic" can have many meanings. I'm specifying the meaning I'm using. I defined what I a...
August 13, 2018 at 17:51
I am sorry, but no. To actually signify a sign must actualize meaning in a mind. If it does not do this, it is only a potential sign. We can recognize...
August 13, 2018 at 15:40
I have a problem with this, because if awareness were one and communal I would be aware of every other persons experience and they of mine. I am not. ...
August 13, 2018 at 15:22
If you are talking about God, I agree that the cosmos is utterly dependent on Him. Still, I don't think that God's existence is so easy to see that at...
August 13, 2018 at 14:41
Yes, there are three atoms independently of anyone counting them, but there is no actual number independently of an agent thinking it.
August 13, 2018 at 03:37
Have I denied that the intentionality of the laws can be traced to God, or that God wills freely? No, I am saying that applying the laws of physics ou...
August 13, 2018 at 03:32
My, my. A little charity, please. Working backward: 1. I am a determinist when physics is an adequate abstraction. 2. I am not a determinist with resp...
August 12, 2018 at 20:55
If there was nothing (no one) to acknowledge the abstraction <rock> there would be no abstraction to acknowledge. There might still be actual rocks, a...
August 12, 2018 at 20:45
Yes. Aquinas would say that the human mind is ordered to the understanding of material being.
August 12, 2018 at 20:41
Thank you for the explanation and reference. I would agree that this is a presupposition of the physical sciences, but I have argued that they have a ...
August 12, 2018 at 20:34
First, I think that we can agree that "representation" has many analogous meanings, and while there are good reasons to prefer your usage, if we are c...
August 12, 2018 at 20:13
Of course "logic" can be defined in many ways, so it is not one thing, but many related things. That is why I defined what I meant by logic: the scien...
August 12, 2018 at 18:31
No, rocks scatter light, gravitate, resist imposed forces, etc., so thy exist.
August 11, 2018 at 19:20
I think "being as such" (being qua being) is not the same as what you're calling "pure being." When I say being qua being, I am thinking of any instan...
August 11, 2018 at 18:44
I have shown you the texts and the logic of the case. There is nothing more I can do.
August 11, 2018 at 17:18
There is noting to "adhere" to. The analogy only explains the naming convention, not a prescriptive rule. Of course not. Analogical predication is par...
August 11, 2018 at 17:16
But the question is on what physical basis can we draw the distinction?
August 10, 2018 at 20:14
There is survival value in generating an "appropriate response." Whether you're moving in the right way in response to data on your internal state or ...
August 10, 2018 at 20:00
Of course, it is metaphysically impossible for nature to "just be" without a concomitant cause.. Why? Because an infallible sign of existence is the a...
August 10, 2018 at 19:48
I like to project reality into different conceptual spaces -- to think about the same thing from different perspectives. I think doing so, and compari...
August 10, 2018 at 19:28
i have no problem with your formulation. Mine attempts to accommodate a neuroscientific approach to mind as much as possible.
August 10, 2018 at 15:46
I see no point in continuing to beat the poor, dead equine.
August 10, 2018 at 15:41
I think of being in terms of what i call "Dynamic Ontology" in the hope of reducing confusion by being more explicit in the meaning of my terms. I was...
August 10, 2018 at 15:39
Because "reality" and "nature" are so general no one would know which aspects we are referring to. Actually, the primary use of "law" in this context,...
August 10, 2018 at 14:36
Thanks
August 10, 2018 at 12:59
That is arguable. What impressed the Greeks the most about nature (physis) is that it changes. Still, Aristotle might argue that change is only possib...
August 10, 2018 at 00:57
Yes. Aristotle calls First Science "theology." We only call it "metaphysics" because the book appears after the Physics in the corpus. First Science o...
August 10, 2018 at 00:28
Hyle is a principle of physical continuity. Arguments for the immortality of the soul point out that there are human operations that do not depend on ...
August 10, 2018 at 00:23
That is the argument of Parmenides that Aristotle answers with the concept of dynamic potency in hyle. Matter is never either the old or new form. It ...
August 09, 2018 at 23:46
If you are describing "what is," your description is based on reality. I am calling that reality, the one being described, a "law of nature." If I am ...
August 09, 2018 at 16:52
Who claims his?
August 09, 2018 at 16:45
Only a discontinuity in form, not in all relevant aspects of being. There is a continuity in the underlying dynamics (dynamis = hyle),
August 09, 2018 at 16:42
If you are describing "what is," your description is based on reality. I am calling that reality, the one being described, a "law of nature." If I am ...
August 09, 2018 at 16:39
Not unless I also denied that the universals we think have a foundation in reality. I do not. I have said that universals result from the actualizatio...
August 09, 2018 at 15:36
Do you have an actual argument? Can you point to an error of fact or reason here? Or does your entire critique rest on the claim that my position is "...
August 09, 2018 at 15:09
I am not sure why agreement is unfortunate. I don't think i'd call mind an "attribute," but i know I wouldn't call it a "substance." I'd prefer to cal...
August 09, 2018 at 14:57
The old definition of logic, as "the science of correct thinking" still works for me. We might be a little more explicit and say it is the science of ...
August 09, 2018 at 00:34
I have done my best to understand your position and arguments. My present conjecture is that by "measure" you do not mean an operation that produces a...
August 08, 2018 at 17:48
You are quite welcome.
August 08, 2018 at 16:49
By "substantial change" Aristotle means generation (in which a new form comes to be), and corruption (in which a form ceases to be), as opposed to acc...
August 08, 2018 at 16:48
Yes, I mean that subjective awareness (as distinct from medical consciousness), is outside of the competence of physics because the Fundamental Abstra...
August 08, 2018 at 16:37
Effectively, you are saying that, regardless of their misguided philosophical beliefs, they practice physics as if there are laws operative in nature....
August 08, 2018 at 15:32
Animals have what we might call "medical consciousness" -- an objectively observable state of responsiveness. We have no evidence that other animals h...
August 07, 2018 at 20:25
I have also studied neuroscience and modern psychology, and found nothing in them to suggest that introspection was dispensable. So, being open to rea...
August 07, 2018 at 17:28
Really? I assume that the unstated premise here is that dogs, horses and cows know as we know, If not, your claim makes little sense. I think that the...
August 06, 2018 at 23:37
I have looked up "IBE" and still have no idea what you are referring to. Which shows that there are rational approaches to reality other than the hypo...
August 06, 2018 at 23:14
No, Aristotle is claiming that. I'm merely agreeing. No, Aristotle considers this possibility in Physics i, 9 and rejects it, because the form of a th...
August 06, 2018 at 19:49