You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Terrapin Station

Comments

It makes sense to say that there are duties a la things that are legally enforced, for example. But if that's what you're saying, then (a) obviously t...
June 18, 2019 at 19:04
It's nonsense to say that a foundational preference could be based on reason, as it would be an attempt to overcome the is/ought problem. How do you p...
June 18, 2019 at 19:02
How and in what sense would you say it imposes duties? Do you just mean things that you'll be possibly fined, arrested, etc. for?
June 18, 2019 at 17:41
Exactly. The construction with a high degree of consensus is actually that "fact" refers to "state of affairs."
June 18, 2019 at 17:39
Moral foundations have nothing to do with reason. They're purely individual preferences.
June 18, 2019 at 17:27
"If the law is immoral" --obviously I'm saying in my view. You're doing that thing where you're figuring that people are going to defer to an "objecti...
June 18, 2019 at 16:38
Sure, but that's not saying that it's immoral to do drugs or take risks oneself. The issue you're bringing up is an issue of putting other persons' li...
June 18, 2019 at 16:36
You question your beliefs, from the framework of other beliefs, perceptions, etc. You're not "standing back" from perceptions and beliefs. And there's...
June 18, 2019 at 16:32
"Right" morally refers to an preference of behavior that an individual has. There is no objective "right" in the sense of "correct" when it comes to m...
June 18, 2019 at 16:31
Each individual. Morality is a matter of individual judgment.
June 18, 2019 at 16:27
So under critical thinking, there are no perceptions or beliefs?
June 18, 2019 at 16:26
Couldn't you say that mathematical statements correspond to relations/the way relations work, at least within the system that we've set up?
June 18, 2019 at 16:25
That's not at all the way that I use the term "objective/objectivity." One reason that I don't use it that way is that this idea is absurd: "stand bac...
June 18, 2019 at 16:20
If the law is immoral, I have no problem with people breaking it, and ideally, I'd like the law to be nullified via tons of people breaking it, or ref...
June 18, 2019 at 16:15
That's understandable. The issue, though, is why should other people be able to legally prohibit you from choosing to take those risks? Why would you ...
June 18, 2019 at 16:12
No disagreement on that. Nevertheless, it's worth pointing out that no one speaks their first languages by choice, especially as "It's clear that not ...
June 18, 2019 at 13:06
She paints a picture of someone at a party being accused of cultural appropriation, And then she says, "And you think that’s a ridiculous accusation. ...
June 18, 2019 at 11:53
You're thinking of "fact" as something like "true statement." (Otherwise saying "facts about" would make no sense.) If we use "fact" in the "state of ...
June 18, 2019 at 11:52
"Proposition" and "statement" are usually treated as synonymous.
June 18, 2019 at 11:46
? That's not what he's saying. The typical approach to the Gettier problems, by the way, is not that JTB is wrong, but that it needs to be better qual...
June 18, 2019 at 11:46
While we're at it, what would it "mean" for a proposition to "appear in the real, physical world"? (Ah, you cleared that up a post or two later: With ...
June 18, 2019 at 11:41
For once we completely agree. I've pointed out this very issue before (and I think I might have posted either here or on the old board about it). As y...
June 18, 2019 at 11:40
I've slipped into a world where everyone suddenly has the same opinions? Oy vey.
June 18, 2019 at 11:32
Some of the many things wrong with that article: * Cultural appropriation isn't the same thing as racism * Racism doesn't make any sense as something ...
June 18, 2019 at 11:30
I'm still wondering what you're thinking it would be difficult to be informed about when it comes to drugs.
June 18, 2019 at 10:43
Okay, but there isn't anyone who doesn't come up with their own ideas. Even simply by focusing on someone else's work, you'll come up with unique inte...
June 18, 2019 at 09:58
So then there is something else other than that which informs potential action.
June 18, 2019 at 09:54
What do you believe it's at all difficult to be informed about here? Also, in your view it's morally wrong to do something to yourself that you're uni...
June 17, 2019 at 22:14
Inflicting nonconsensual violence on another person isn't at all the same thing as people engaging in consensual activities. It certainly is your busi...
June 17, 2019 at 22:13
Okay, but again, in the "what does that have to do with" department, what does that have to do with saying that consciousness is an illusion, with den...
June 17, 2019 at 21:23
Are the irrelevancies something other than that which informs potential action?
June 17, 2019 at 20:36
If you're talking about brains functioning in mental ways, sure. But contextually you didn't seem to be talking about that.
June 17, 2019 at 20:28
I don't believe that really describes anyone.
June 17, 2019 at 20:26
I first became seriously interested in philosophy when I was 11 years old. Diving into the field at that age had many benefits for me, both at the tim...
June 17, 2019 at 20:25
If that were the case, then why would we point out that that's the only important thing? What are you making a distinction with respect to re the word...
June 17, 2019 at 20:17
You're supposing that there somehow are proper names that no one has said or thought?
June 17, 2019 at 19:59
What I'm asking you for is supporting claims. Why do I have to supply them when you don't, when you're the one initiating claims?
June 17, 2019 at 19:49
No, you didn't. What I'm looking for is something like this: "What makes it the case that only facilitating the choice of future action, including the...
June 17, 2019 at 19:47
Correct. Why on Earth you'd think that anyone would have some moral obligation to do everything they can to live as long as possible, I don't know. Th...
June 17, 2019 at 19:44
You don't seem to mention what you think is wrong with it.
June 17, 2019 at 19:30
What would you say makes it the case that something is important or that something matters? For example, what would make it the case that only facilit...
June 17, 2019 at 13:41
No. That's simple enough. ;-)
June 17, 2019 at 13:37
They're mental things done by the brain. If we use the term "subjective" to refer to mental phenomena, then they're subjective by definition. The defi...
June 17, 2019 at 13:07
Which seems to be starting from an assumption that there aren't qualia, or at least that there aren't subjective experiences qua subjective experience...
June 17, 2019 at 13:00
I want to try to keep this relatively simple (with an emphasis on "relatively"), but as I mentioned, I'm not a realist on laws. I'm not a realist on a...
June 17, 2019 at 12:54
Morality is preferences about interpersonal behavior. It's not any particular preferences. Many people have many preferences in common, and that's bot...
June 17, 2019 at 00:52
Aside from "indeterministic laws" being a questionable idea in general, why would one have to believe in indeterminstic laws? In any event, it could w...
June 17, 2019 at 00:49
One doesn't have to believe that physical things are deterministic. The free will I care about is the ability to choose between a tuna and a turkey sa...
June 16, 2019 at 23:40
I'm going to naysay something if I believe it's incorrect. And if you're going to interact with people in a philosophical context, you need to expect ...
June 16, 2019 at 22:33
I'm disagreeing with the perspective, because I believe it gets things wrong.
June 16, 2019 at 21:34