You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Terrapin Station

Comments

Yeah, I'd not argue that people don't more often get addicted. I don't know what the percentage would be, and I don't know if anyone knows that. It's ...
June 12, 2017 at 20:27
I don't see why it matters if you see how it's relevant.
June 12, 2017 at 20:25
Tell me something about your background with philosophy. I'm curious how this question can fit with the content and tenor of your other comments in th...
June 12, 2017 at 19:19
As I'm doing here, I highlighted your post and hit the "quote" button. It's not as if I retyped anything. You apparently edited your post after I quot...
June 12, 2017 at 19:17
Analysis of what meaning is isn't a field other than philosophy. What biology gets right about beetles and flowers is certainly important for philosop...
June 12, 2017 at 18:55
The philosophical significance is that it gets right what meaning is. The point of philosophy isn't to make shit up that has no resemblance to what th...
June 12, 2017 at 18:30
I don't buy that we're talking about some "special sense of the term 'meaning'" in philosophy. If Frege only cared about truth, then that apparently l...
June 12, 2017 at 18:05
Well, meaning is simply a mental association one makes with a term (for example). One can easily do that with a single term.
June 12, 2017 at 18:03
Why would anyone claim that?
June 12, 2017 at 17:09
In: Causality  — view comment
Correct. A computer making a "decision" is only metaphorical--it's a way that we think about it, anthropomorphizing it, to make it easier for us to co...
June 12, 2017 at 14:39
Yes. Don't forget that I've been a professional musician for a long time. I've done a lot of drug experimentation.
June 12, 2017 at 14:36
Says me because that's what facts (states of affairs in the world) say. Just to clarify here, all that noting that it's subjective is saying is that m...
June 12, 2017 at 12:06
Yes, that's definitely possible.
June 12, 2017 at 11:30
When a response begins with "On my view, and this is no thought experiment, space isn't . . ." it should clue you in to the fact that I'm not talking ...
June 12, 2017 at 11:23
Yes, of course. That's what morality is.
June 12, 2017 at 11:15
In: Groot!  — view comment
Because it's just an example of fiction writing.
June 12, 2017 at 11:14
Right. so it's not a change on your view, because we specified that there is no third thing, that it's acausal, etc. I just want to confirm that on yo...
June 12, 2017 at 11:11
Whether one action or another is moral is a matter of preferences that individuals have. Moral dilemmas prod you into thinking about your preferences ...
June 12, 2017 at 03:04
The claim that it's bullshit is based on what?
June 12, 2017 at 02:59
On my view, and this is no thought experiment, space isn't something separate from particular existents. Space isn't something existents are "in." It'...
June 12, 2017 at 02:55
Right, so on your view, 9:31 obtains, it disappears and 9:32 obtains in its place--that's not a change?
June 12, 2017 at 02:52
:-}
June 12, 2017 at 02:49
I wasn't saying anything about truth value either. And obviously plenty of folks think the concept makes sense. The slightest bit of critical analysis...
June 11, 2017 at 20:34
I consume plenty of porn, so yeah. You're thinking of more or less a caricatured stereotype.
June 11, 2017 at 19:50
You know that a huge percentage of porn is fetish porn, including chubby women, mature women, very average looking women, etc., right?
June 11, 2017 at 19:47
A lot of porn actors' kids probably have no idea what they do for a living. (At least when they're young kids.) A lot of porn actors aren't unusually ...
June 11, 2017 at 19:44
Well, or that it's a nonsensical concept even if you're not the only person fond of it. In other words, whether it's nonsense has nothing to do with h...
June 11, 2017 at 19:37
That's not why I don't have an issue with that. I don't reach any personal moral conclusions because of meta-ethical facts. I don't have a problem wit...
June 11, 2017 at 19:12
I dont buy that it's not the same thing under another name. "Self-evident" too.
June 11, 2017 at 19:07
An argument is valid or not. Not (interpersonal) behavior. I'm not of the view that any speech or expression is unacceptable.
June 11, 2017 at 19:02
Ideally, if you don't enjoy what you're doing, change it. You can change it radically. It's important to realize that you can make radical changes and...
June 11, 2017 at 18:29
Which means that among other things, you're assuming that: (a) kids are watching so much porn that they have a veritable mental catalog of porn actors...
June 11, 2017 at 18:18
In: Groot!  — view comment
We have to think in terms of universals in order to survive. There's too much information to deal with otherwise. We need abbreviations, generalizatio...
June 11, 2017 at 17:48
In: Groot!  — view comment
I don't agree with that claim, however.
June 11, 2017 at 17:45
In: Groot!  — view comment
I kind of have to translate what you're saying there. First, concepts are occurences in individuals' minds on my view. What it means to say that a con...
June 11, 2017 at 17:41
In: Groot!  — view comment
So realizing that the properties aren't numerically the same (which of course isn't saying something about a number we might be assigning to anything;...
June 11, 2017 at 17:34
I can empathize with your concerns there, but I don't think it's any better to say that everything must have a reason, either. And "everything must ha...
June 11, 2017 at 17:25
In: Groot!  — view comment
So we have to be careful when we say "they have the exact same property." If you agree that they each have their own charge, you're not saying that li...
June 11, 2017 at 17:15
Nope. Not at all. You're wrong that I'm wrong about that. Correct. And that it's not coincidence that large scale agreement occurs has absolutely no b...
June 11, 2017 at 17:10
That's not at all how I use the word "valid." That use of the word "valid" seems like a category error to me. But in any event, I'm fine with anyone f...
June 11, 2017 at 17:04
If there's one thing and then something else replaces it, that's not a change?
June 11, 2017 at 17:00
In: Groot!  — view comment
Well, so the issue is if, among two electrons, there's just one charge that they happen to both share somehow (how?--how does the charge get completel...
June 11, 2017 at 16:58
In: Groot!  — view comment
The idea of type realism is that there is one thing that's somehow shared between multiple things. The following isn't a direct analogy, but it helps ...
June 11, 2017 at 15:03
In: Groot!  — view comment
Nominalism doesn't deny similarities. It denies numerical identities (that are multiply instantiated, which is what types are). |..| is more simliar t...
June 11, 2017 at 14:25
In: Causality  — view comment
I don't buy the notion of subconscious mental content. So I don't buy that subconscious mental content could be a factor in making a decision.
June 11, 2017 at 14:20
In: Groot!  — view comment
Okay, but I explained this above: "Indviduals do this non-arbitrarily. It's in response to things experienced." You're not thinking that either either...
June 11, 2017 at 14:17
I should probably note that I'm not of the opinion that someone shouldn't do something just because someone else finds it "degrading." Valuation is al...
June 11, 2017 at 14:13
In: Groot!  — view comment
Before we go further with this, we should probably cement just how you're using "arbitrary." Are you using it with a connotation of "random"?
June 11, 2017 at 14:10
In: Groot!  — view comment
Right--that's your view, but that's what I'm explciitly disagreeing with, and I'm showing you why your arguments for it so far do not work. In my opin...
June 11, 2017 at 14:07
In: Causality  — view comment
Again, I'd agree that if you explicitly think something like "I can do this or do nothing" then you'd make that decision (well, as long as you do make...
June 11, 2017 at 13:41