You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Terrapin Station

Comments

How about this for a background? https://i.ytimg.com/vi/s17PEUd3Pcg/maxresdefault.jpg
October 04, 2019 at 20:29
I'm waiting for the tie-dye pattern. Or at least some paisley.
October 04, 2019 at 20:26
I think emotional pain is a real thing, sure. But, there's no need to be offended by anything anyone says. I see being offended as a flaw with the per...
October 04, 2019 at 20:22
Note that I'm not making the claim that "most Americans were not racist." Rather I'm skeptical about the claim that most were. That's not what I'm get...
October 04, 2019 at 19:14
Sure, we want to be able to trust people, but we often can not, and there's no way to enforce that everyone is going to be trustworthy. Keep in mind, ...
October 04, 2019 at 19:00
?? Not what I said. It's more that you wouldn't agree with you at a stage of development in your thought about this stuff that didn't resemble a high ...
October 04, 2019 at 17:44
Can you explain this question?
October 04, 2019 at 17:20
No. That's not even a sophormoric conflation. It's a freshman-level conflation. Or a high school kid getting high and thinking that he might be intere...
October 04, 2019 at 13:11
We're still working on you understanding how measurements are objective. You keep bringing up thinking about measurements --concepts, applying particu...
October 04, 2019 at 10:15
I'm not asking about naming and thinking about.
October 03, 2019 at 22:17
That's talking about the concepts. That's not what I'm asking about.
October 03, 2019 at 22:09
That's exactly what I'm talking about. You apparently aren't understanding my comments. I wrote above "being a female or male biologically would have ...
October 03, 2019 at 21:57
No matter what your feelings, how could you be born a biological male and not feel like a biological male? Any way you feel is a way that a biological...
October 03, 2019 at 21:43
Meanwhile the title of the thread is "Disambiguating the concept of gender"??
October 03, 2019 at 21:09
So then you don't think that it's subjective.
October 03, 2019 at 21:07
I wasn't asking you anything like that. I'm asking you if you think it's literally mental content and not a piece of plastic etc. that's independent o...
October 03, 2019 at 19:28
Huh? So you think the device is just something you're imagining, and it's an artificial division of something you're imagining?
October 03, 2019 at 19:24
This, for example: If you're a biological male, then any conceivable way your body is shaped, or any possible way that you shape it via modifications,...
October 03, 2019 at 19:01
What I've never understood is the fact that all of this "gender fluidity" stuff seems to be buying into stereotypes about biological sex hook, line an...
October 03, 2019 at 18:58
I'm guessing you'd say that "access consciousness" is amenable to scientific study? (Also, it seems like on the page you're linking to, you define "ac...
October 03, 2019 at 18:37
So, the part I agree with you about is that describing consciousness from a third-person, scientific perspective--maybe some sort of physico-chemico-b...
October 03, 2019 at 18:23
I can't be the first person you've run into where that doesn't work. It would probably be a good idea to learn how to let that go if it's causing you ...
October 03, 2019 at 17:22
i suppose it's some sort of psychological thing where you figure you can always get folks to come around to your thinking if you just try hard enough?
October 03, 2019 at 17:20
When that's one's assessment, why wouldn't one simply move on and not bother with the person in question? Wouldn't that be a simple solution that woul...
October 03, 2019 at 17:14
Well, it's always going to be at least partially a matter of how people semantically interpret what's said, and people have some degree of control ove...
October 03, 2019 at 17:12
Re the quotations, by the way, so then the answer is no, no one has suggested the complex/compound versus simple/atomic categorization you're suggesti...
October 03, 2019 at 17:01
So when you use a device like this: http://www.johnsonlevel.com/Content/files/LaserDistanceMeasure.png (And here's some info about it, including links...
October 03, 2019 at 16:40
First off, there's been absolutely nothing to even suggest that anyone is forwarding a categorization of complex/compound versus simple/atomic moral s...
October 03, 2019 at 16:22
The measurement isn't in your mind.
October 03, 2019 at 16:08
Also, you're missing the whole point, which is that when you have recalcitrant data, you don't just insist that the data has to be wrong. You have to ...
October 03, 2019 at 16:07
That might be, but we don't go by subjective reports for this. We make objective measurements. We can't do that when what we're studying is subjective...
October 03, 2019 at 15:49
"The earth is round" isn't about individual's subjective experiences. It's about the objective shape of the Earth. "S has mental content M" is about s...
October 03, 2019 at 15:45
I don't understand that clause, starting with not being able to figure out what "instantiating the import(ance) . . . " might amount to.
October 03, 2019 at 15:14
By the way, this is unfortunately what we more or less literally have done when it comes to positing something like dark matter. We realize that our e...
October 03, 2019 at 15:04
In other words, the only way to link third-person observational stuff like brain imaging to mental phenomena is via first-person reports from the subj...
October 03, 2019 at 14:31
The problem is rather that: (a) if S is making what's being classified as a "complex moral choice," and (b) S reports that he's making the choice simp...
October 03, 2019 at 14:22
First, I only have a moral objection to force (when it's nonconsensually applied, and then only with particular criteria). I don't believe that speech...
October 03, 2019 at 14:15
Your speech doesn't force my psychological states. At any rate, if you don't want to be straightforward about what you think the thought experiment sh...
October 03, 2019 at 14:03
Well, or just be straightforward and say what you think it's supposed to be showing.
October 03, 2019 at 13:50
What is that thought experiment supposed to be showing?
October 03, 2019 at 13:49
Re relevance, everything is relevant to some things and not relevant to others, depending on the interpretational framing one is doing. That's why I d...
October 03, 2019 at 13:47
What fact would you say we're disagreeing on?
October 03, 2019 at 13:47
That's not the case. We're not disagreeing on any facts. We're disagreeing on whether those facts are acceptable. In other words, I'm fine saying for ...
October 03, 2019 at 13:44
So one, I have issues with the methodology of lots of those sorts of claims. We could get into that, but it would be a big, detailed diversion to get ...
October 03, 2019 at 13:39
By the way, I don't know if you saw me mention this, but for some weird reason, I often do not receive notifications for posts you respond to. It happ...
October 03, 2019 at 13:27
Yeah, not immoral to me. I'm someone who wants people to express themselves as they feel like expressing themselves, and who thinks that we need to no...
October 03, 2019 at 13:14
It could just be speech, for example. I don't consider any speech immoral.
October 03, 2019 at 12:09
I'd say it must be "caused," but contiguous, etc. physical force is how I'm using the term "cause" there. So I'm substituting "force" for that to make...
October 03, 2019 at 11:45
For one, I don't consider any psychological states to be forced by environmental factors such as speech, and I only have an ethical problem with nonco...
October 03, 2019 at 11:34
Correct.
October 03, 2019 at 11:33