I'd add that it has to be more than a mere correlation, it has to be a "direct connection" between two things (I would say an intentional connection, ...
You can just make up shit, you mean? There is no "general rule" about preferences that is universal. In addition, there are no preferences period, whe...
Because they've expressed them. Sometimes formally: again, here's an example: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advance_healthcare_directive If you want t...
For an unconscious person, their preferences prior to being unconscious are what matter (for example: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advance_healthcare...
I don't think it needs to be explained. At any rate, there's no way I'd get into a "Does this work/count as an explanation" discussion without you fir...
What happened to this part: "Possibilities simply amount to a state not being impossible given contingent facts. "Potential" is often used with a more...
Not to mention that it has nothing whatsoever to do with climate scientists' area of expertise. But we can't even predict simple sociological phenomen...
I want "bantery" posts anyway, even if we're "strictly" doing philosophy. I prefer chatting to message board posting partially for this reason. It's t...
If I were going to bother "proving wrong" every ridiculous or dubious thing that anyone said, that's all I'd be doing 24/7. I'll let a sort of natural...
Change obtains because things are in motion. It could also obtain acausally or indeterministically. Possibilities simply amount to a state not being i...
Keep reading. One distinction was the sentence that followed in the post you quoted: "If there are physical laws, it's literally impossible to 'disobe...
I don't agree with Wittgenstein, though. (And in my opinion the "Wittgenstein cult" is one of the worst things to happen to philosophy in the last 100...
Look, basically you think of things like definitions as being meaning, and the definitions still exist as words in a dictionary, say, even when no peo...
Anything extant has empirical evidence available --it has properties, for example. The relevant context here is whether there's empirical evidence. Wh...
Our awareness is about epistemology. Ontologically, empirical evidence is appropriate if we're talking about things that have properties, that interac...
Wtf? I just said that it's ridiculous in my opinion to think that empirical evidence is ever inappropriate, especially when we're doing ontology. That...
The empirical evidence there is of us doing something. There's zero evidence of meaning obtaining outside of that. We obviously do not think of the ma...
What I'm going by is empirical evidence. There's no empirical evidence of meaning obtaining outside of people thinking in particular ways. There's no ...
Get lost with that crap. Societal problems could happen. It's not a bad idea to prepare for that possibility. The problem is that there's no way in he...
Let's see if we agree on a couple things so we don't have to go back over them: We agree that "If x is/means/etc. y, then x is/means/etc. y" is tautol...
Consent is a category error because there's no one to either grant or withhold consent. We need there to be a person capable of granting or withholdin...
Typo--I'm trying to get used to a new keyboard. I guess I wasn't hitting the shift key right. :wink: Anyway, so I guess I'd need to ask Mr. Gensler wh...
I brushed over that the first time I read your post. That's an English paraphrase of 1=1=2 according to whom? It certainly bears no resemblance to any...
It's not that it's trivial it's that it's a category error. I've explained this to you before. It doesn't stop being a category error just because you...
Likewise, there's nothing in "If Herbert Hoover is president, then Herbert Hoover is president" to imply that that will change, is there? The conditio...
Comments