You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

hunterkf5732

['Member']Joined: August 30, 2016 at 19:14Last active: January 06, 2017 at 14:482 discussions71 comments
Location: Sri Lanka

Favourite Quotations

"Time you enjoy wasting is not wasted time"
-Bertrand Russell-

Discussions (2)

Comments

Isn't this something that's immediately obvious? What arguments could you raise against this?
January 03, 2017 at 13:38
Religion, in general, has the feature of there being some ancient doctrine according to which adherents are expected to think and behave. This doctrin...
January 03, 2017 at 13:34
What does "world-transcending" mean in this context? Does it imply some form of supernatural power over the forces of nature, or is it metaphorical in...
January 03, 2017 at 13:17
That's an interesting question. I'd say a railroad spike is merely an object occupying some portion of space at some point in time having the property...
December 30, 2016 at 13:32
Surely self-esteem is not as important a drive as hunger? Would you say then that self-esteem or some form of narcissism must always exist in every hu...
December 30, 2016 at 13:24
I think the problem of transformation could be avoided if we simply say that an object which has undergone some form of transformation is no longer th...
December 30, 2016 at 13:15
Doesn't this simply affirm that the object in question must exist before any sentient being could identify its essence? How does this refute the state...
December 30, 2016 at 13:11
I agree entirely with your first paragraph. Why "other"? If you agree that cognition makes one's perception of the world entirely subjective, then who...
December 30, 2016 at 13:06
All of the things you name are perceived by your senses and then interpreted by your brain which inherently makes them subjective, hence failing as an...
December 30, 2016 at 12:58
Why is this true? Assuming that a non-perceptual reality exists, what brings you to this statement?
December 30, 2016 at 12:53
Yum
December 30, 2016 at 12:47
The distinction is already formed from the very definition of the self. The self is defined in the first place as the entity within us which receives ...
December 30, 2016 at 12:46
Yes. We believe things which the greatest amount of evidence in our experience support.
December 29, 2016 at 11:52
In the dog example, the belief that all dogs are black is absolutely correct until you meet, hear about, or in some other way subjectively experience ...
December 29, 2016 at 11:37
The explanation is that our subjective interpretation of the world changes according to the data the world provides to our senses. So while our earlie...
December 29, 2016 at 11:21
Would you say then that the rights of the animals held in these zoos don't enter into the discussion?
December 29, 2016 at 11:11
But would you say that in the carpenter example, original work in the art of building chairs could be done by the form of practice the carpenter is en...
December 29, 2016 at 11:07
It was subjectively true only until the time at which you first met a brown dog. It was falsified afterwards because then, a brown dog entered your su...
December 29, 2016 at 11:00
The belief that dogs are black is mistaken because you have now encountered a dog in your subjective experience of the world, which is brown and hence...
December 29, 2016 at 10:43
I'm a skydiver:D
December 29, 2016 at 10:34
Mistaken beliefs could be explained without referring to an objective reality. There is an extent to which we can subjectively experience the world ar...
December 29, 2016 at 10:31
Yeah that was my point in the first place, that you can't make any statements about anything which are objectively true i.e. objective truth isn't pos...
December 29, 2016 at 10:14
Sure, but that that doesn't make it objectively true that there is objective truth.
December 29, 2016 at 10:02
Truth that is there despite what you say or think about it, would be objective truth. In light of the fact that all humans experience the world throug...
December 29, 2016 at 09:56
Are you saying that all forms of practice lead to art? In my own experience, certain forms of practice would not spurn any original thoughts but would...
December 29, 2016 at 09:49
From what I know of it, nirvana has little to do with believing anything. It's about understanding that the cause of all of life's unhappiness lies in...
December 29, 2016 at 09:38
What's the pretty good evidence you have?
September 16, 2016 at 20:06
I never said " existence'' couldn't be used as a noun. My contention all along is that, contrary to what you originally said, (Here I requote) "big'' ...
September 16, 2016 at 19:08
yes
September 16, 2016 at 19:01
By considering all possible arguments one can think of, for and against the idea of an objective world, and inspecting whether the greater weight of a...
September 16, 2016 at 14:30
Wouldn't you say that the "power" of logic resides, at least to some extent, in all of us, and that this could be the undeniable authority we could re...
September 16, 2016 at 14:28
Would you say that it is probable that a world exists; one that is independent of us?
September 16, 2016 at 14:24
I agree with the paragraph that comes before this, but the fact that we talk about the concept "big" does not imply that we are talking about "big" as...
September 16, 2016 at 14:21
Yeah but since we all seem to be referring to the same world in our conversations,etc, is it unreasonable to assume that there exists an "objective" w...
September 16, 2016 at 14:16
Supposing that in a community of 100 people, 50 endorse one side of a moral issue and the other 50 endorse the contrary, how would you decide what is ...
September 09, 2016 at 20:31
Depends on what you mean by the above. Rejection of free will requires "faith" in the scientific method which leads us to determinism.
September 09, 2016 at 17:00
Wouldn't you first have to show that there is a mind independent reality?
September 09, 2016 at 16:54
Wow, did you really say that unenlightened? Btw, if so, which offensive fuckers were you referring to?
September 09, 2016 at 16:47
You say that computers are not an analogue at all to human brains. Thus, a single similarity would suffice, to show that at least in this sense, they ...
September 09, 2016 at 16:38
What I mean, is a more general question: Do you think that anything (may it be actions,wardrobes,whatever you name) could be categorized as moral or i...
September 09, 2016 at 16:21
I'll just skip to the chase; the mystery common goal behind all of these things you name is, happiness. Look hard enough at the motivations that make ...
September 09, 2016 at 16:18
I never said that computers bear a fantastic, twin-like resemblance to the human brain. My contention all along, was that computers are better analogu...
September 09, 2016 at 16:12
Could you now find some common goal that lies behind the things you name?
September 09, 2016 at 15:29
By this do you mean you endorse some form of objective morality, where actions,beliefs,etc can be "correctly categorised" in a manner independent of t...
September 09, 2016 at 15:23
I'm not sure what Wittgenstein would have said, but I think "logical truths'' ,in the binary true/false sense of the term, was disposed of anyway in e...
September 09, 2016 at 15:02
I believe you have failed to comprehend the argument. So here's how it goes, explained in a simpler fashion. We first observe human brains and their f...
September 09, 2016 at 14:54
Well then, what do you think is the most common goal that people are interested in?
September 09, 2016 at 14:40
This seems like a very reasonable thing to say.What opposition is there to this claim?
September 07, 2016 at 20:33
It just happens to be a component of human psychology to look at things more in terms of danger and harm instead of pleasure and benefits. It's develo...
September 07, 2016 at 20:26
Computers are, currently at least, the best metaphor we have for the workings of the human brain. So it isn't unreasonable to extrapolate from compute...
September 07, 2016 at 20:20