You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Pattern-chaser

Comments

Have you never considered religions before? A lack of objective support is normal and expected.
May 21, 2019 at 16:47
You just keep asserting the same thing. Can you provide some substance, please, in addition to your insistence that it is (must be) so?
May 21, 2019 at 14:25
Americans! :gasp: Guns aren't the answer to everything! Thinking about it, guns aren't the answer to anything. Seriously: can you offer some sort of r...
May 21, 2019 at 14:22
And you think that hurling personal insults is not wasting our time? :chin:
May 21, 2019 at 14:14
It is? Why?
May 21, 2019 at 14:11
The problem with assumptions (guesses) is that they become invisible, which is mostly our fault. Perhaps we don't like the idea of our thinking being ...
May 21, 2019 at 13:37
The Christians were not the first to have a triple God, and they probably won't be the last. Just consider the Trinity to be a three-person representa...
May 21, 2019 at 12:21
Basically, it's From each according to their means; to each according to their needs. It's a communal insurance policy. Some of us are better able to ...
May 21, 2019 at 12:13
Yes, and sadly we betrayed the values that we promoted, and we consumed and consumed as no previous generation had! Humans had been destroying the wor...
May 21, 2019 at 11:53
Don't you think it's a little bit, er, tawdry to imply that I offered only half of the picture, when I already said what you said? I took the trouble ...
May 21, 2019 at 11:36
Do you not see me distinguishing between that which is community-based - or "social", as I originally wrote - and that which is based on the individua...
May 20, 2019 at 11:39
Yes, we can "discover many real principles and properties" using maths to help, but that does not show maths to be discovered, only the "principles an...
May 20, 2019 at 11:34
Imagine it's 100 or so years ago, before Einstein released his findings concerning relativity and the like. And imagine you, saying "I would ask that ...
May 20, 2019 at 11:28
Huh? These laws are passed and accepted by communities, and if we break them (and we're caught), there is a penalty to pay. Zero obligation? I think n...
May 19, 2019 at 16:25
The conscious mind is able to decide some things, and to take some actions. For sure, the rest-of-the-mind (often called the unconscious mind) is heav...
May 19, 2019 at 16:17
Unnecessary? Yes, I suppose. We managed without one. But, even if they're unnecessary, perhaps having a conscious mind is beneficial, compared with no...
May 19, 2019 at 15:38
Highlighted addition is mine. ] It depends on whether that law is moral, immoral or amoral, doesn't it?
May 19, 2019 at 15:06
As I said: ...and some are one or the other. It depends on the law. If the law echoes morality (as it would in an ideal world), then it would be illeg...
May 19, 2019 at 15:02
Sounds and scribbles that carry meaning, and thus become able to be used as a communications tool. :chin:
May 18, 2019 at 13:50
No, it's illegal to break the law. It's immoral to do wrong. Many things are both, and many more neither, but they aren't the same thing.
May 18, 2019 at 13:47
Of course there is. Morality is personal. Laws, properly drafted, are communal; social. Laws, at their best, reflect the consensus morality of the com...
May 18, 2019 at 13:45
I do not argue against transcendence, but I wonder where it exists, outside of our minds? And I wonder if my answer is "nowhere"?
May 18, 2019 at 13:41
Maths is indispensable because it's a good and well-crafted tool. It's useful. Also in its predictive power, as you say. For those without satnavs, (r...
May 18, 2019 at 13:36
And where does this map exist? Where is the 'place' where this map is stored and retained, ready for later use? The only thing I know of that can stor...
May 18, 2019 at 13:30
I meant to say that we humans have not always had what we call our conscious minds. Before that, we had minds, of course, but were mainly instinctive,...
May 18, 2019 at 13:26
"We can" - "we are able to". Yes, mostly, or at least often, we are. But often we are not. Rationality is not something we always can, or do, do. ... ...
May 18, 2019 at 13:22
Personally, I use "believe" to describe anything I think is true. I use "know" to describe things that I'm a lot more sure about. But this seems to be...
May 16, 2019 at 18:35
Then what word (label) do you use to describe the things you think you know?
May 16, 2019 at 18:23
Philosophy?
May 16, 2019 at 17:49
Yes, once we have accepted the axioms and theorems of set theory, number theory and arithmetic, we find that "1 + 1 = 2" is defined to be true. It can...
May 16, 2019 at 17:46
As a general point, it is neither moral nor immoral to break the law. But sadly, the reasoning behind this is trivial. A criminal breaks the law; her ...
May 16, 2019 at 17:40
They did? When was this? I do not suggest we don't do these things, or that we don't do lots of other things too. But I do wonder if we still do a lot...
May 16, 2019 at 17:04
But controversy follows immediately after any attempt to describe or define these differences! :chin:
May 16, 2019 at 17:00
I just looked back, to the topic title: "Is it immoral to do illegal drugs?" A little thought leads me to the (simplistic?) conclusion that this is ea...
May 16, 2019 at 16:58
Isn't it illegal to break the law, but immoral to break a moral code?
May 16, 2019 at 16:53
The brain is physical, while consciousness is not. Confusing the two will only lead to confusion, I suspect. For this to make sense, you need first to...
May 16, 2019 at 16:49
Are you saying that no knowledge is possible without consciousness, or am I misreading your words?
May 16, 2019 at 16:42
Before the appearance of consciousness in humans (for it has not always been there), it seems we must have got by with what we had before. :up:
May 16, 2019 at 16:40
Yes, yes, OK. :smile: So the question should properly be: can/do spontaneous events occur, or can/do events occur spontaneously? :chin:
May 16, 2019 at 16:34
But the learning you describe relies on memory, the memory that fire gave rise to pain in the past, and therefore might do so again, if we get close e...
May 16, 2019 at 16:27
Nicely put. :up:
May 16, 2019 at 16:20
...and maybe some deities care about all life. Maybe their purpose is to nurture life, not to nurture humans at the expense of all other life? Wouldn'...
May 16, 2019 at 16:17
I cannot help but admire your ambition. :smile: You have renamed our map as a plan, something made beforehand to describe what will be made, instead o...
May 16, 2019 at 16:10
Ah! Emigration. :up:
May 15, 2019 at 18:28
Colombus started mass immigration into Europe?
May 15, 2019 at 17:45
Not axiomatic? :chin:
May 15, 2019 at 17:44
Yes, some bits of maths are interesting, and most of it is useful too. But this topic asks whether maths is invented or discovered. To believe that ma...
May 15, 2019 at 17:34
No, I think it's already just a little too precise. I think it should be something like this: The axiomatization of mathematical ideas is invented, bu...
May 14, 2019 at 17:49
Well we do seem to need some degree of understanding of human and animal cognition, as you ask us to... The simple answer to that is: I don't have a c...
May 14, 2019 at 15:38
As we look at animal cognition, we see all kinds of similarities to humans, similarities that we humans didn't expect. It would be foolish to state th...
May 14, 2019 at 13:57