Just keep denying blindly whatever has been countered, forwarded or pointed out, is not philosophical argument. So whatever the majority believes is t...
That's what I read from the philosophical text books. Not making it up from the thin air. Clarification on the concepts is part of the philosophical i...
I wasn't asking for help. You seem to be distorting the facts. I was just pointing out on the wrong use of the concepts. Because of the misconception ...
Not sure if your account on coherence is correct or not. My understanding of coherence is that when P is true, Q cannot be untrue, and vice versa. In ...
That is an idea of absolute idealist and solipsism. Problem with these ideas is that they cannot appeal to or share objective knowledge. Illusions are...
The point is not about living in a reality, but the fact that private experience is not objective ground for coherence. Again, not the whole experienc...
Seeing a cup in a location is your private perception. It lacks objective ground for anything being coherent. It makes more crucial and important part...
It exists in the physical world with no relation to the mind. However, when you perceive it, it appears in your mind. It doesn't exist in your mind. Y...
From reasoning and inference. Mind doesn't have outside or inside. Whatever appears in mind must exist, if they could be observed and verified as exis...
When something is coherent, it is meaningful. demonstrable, provable and verifiable. Can you prove your seeing a cup is coherent? Beliefs and thoughts...
It does not make sense to say, your seeing a cup with a set of properties in a location is the ground for the experience being coherent. You are bound...
I agree. There are no such things as gravity, but only the phenomenon that things fall down to the ground from the air when released. From the observa...
Reason is not just for right or wrong. It is the general faculty for all knowledge. How do you know they are coherent? What is the ground for your exp...
"I think therefore I am" is not an affirmation, but inference. He was still doubting his own existence, and the possibility that he thinks. But his do...
You can doubt anything, but the fact that you are doubting cannot be doubted, hence the only certainty in the universe. Wasn't it the idea of Cartesia...
In that case, it is nothing to do with coherence. You cannot claim coherence from experience when you are not interested in right or wrong. Something ...
The coherence must be from our reasoning. What is the substance in your experience? We don't see or know anything about a substance in our experience....
You should have said "Which premises are problematic?" rather than "P1 or P2, do you have a problem with?" Your sentence was then not communicating yo...
You did. What are the relevance between P1) and C1)? How does C1) derive from P1)? This conclusion doesn't have logical consequence from P1), and soun...
You seem to be misunderstanding what Modus Pones is, and how it works. MP is in the form of, P -> C P C You must demonstrate and prove why P is the ca...
Doing so without clear evidence or information of the type or nature of the distance in the track would be commiting a fallacy of illicit presumption....
Depending on the type of two points in the distance (which is not clear in the OP), the conclusion can be true, which makes the argument invalid. Thin...
Unsound argument means the premise was false, and also invalid reasoning was applied for the conclusion. Here reasoning seems valid, but the premise w...
From my experience of reading the posts written by so called the analytic folks, some of them seem to suffer from total lack of, or narrow and shallow...
I would say my philosophical method is not analytical as such, because I have never read analytical philosophy much. I would rather think my method co...
Having said that, in fact analogy doesn't make much sense, if it is not supported by the arguments and evidence on why something works as it does, why...
There are some common grounds between Hegel's philosophy and Analytic philosophy. They are not totally opposite ends with no common grounds. There are...
Yes, you misunderstood me there. Everyone knows Hegel is a monist. I meant, from what Hegel was saying, Kant's dualism doesn't make sense, unless of c...
Your explanation on dreams and awakening comparing with continuity and discontinuity was an analogy not identity you claimed. That is fair enough. But...
This sounds ambiguous too. The expression "the movement of thought" doesn't make sense at all. Thought is always about something, and it always happen...
Saying God is personified spirit, that sounds like a religious claim. In philosophy, God is to be proved either via reasoning or presenting the eviden...
It doesn't seem to explain or help us understand why we dream or what is the nature of our awakening from sleep. You need to try to explain why and ho...
Dreaming is a psychological event, and awakening is a biological function of a body. Dreams are devoid of any rational explanations on their origin an...
So Hegel criticised Kant setting up his own system of philosophy. But almost all the philosophers after Hegel criticised Hegel's philosophy, it looks....
In Kant, our knowledge is limited to what we can experience. Beyond that is the world of unknown. Some say that it is Kant giving room for faith along...
I was thinking about what reasoning could be. There is no such things as reason, but reasonable acts, rational decisions and thoughts about the world,...
My idea on Will is in line with both Schopenhauer and Nietzsche's. I am still trying to find out on Hegel's idea on will. https://www.youtube.com/watc...
Kant was already dead, when both were active in the univ. lecturing. Hegel's class was full with the students, while Schopenhauer class had 3 - 4. Sch...
Your description seems to be based on the classical logic. Have you read about Relevance Logic and also the Entailment Logic, which use axiomatic proo...
Comments