Corvus

Your posts lack philosophical contents. They will be ignored from now on.

] This is not good, that you inserted "]" in your post, so quoting your sentence will get derailed. This type of writing is unnecessary in philosophic...

If you did read Kant properly, then you would have mentioned on intuition and judgement aspects of Apperception, which you haven't. It just sounded hi...

It is a risk of being crude language which is highly informal, vulgar and not philosophical at all. We are here to investigate and explore the issues ...

It sounds like you are grossly misrepresenting Kant's concept of apperception with 1-2 lines you read from Wiki. Kant was not just talking about repre...

If dream is a form of perception, then where does the images and contents of the dreams which have no connection to the real world, or past memories c...

I agree with your point, that dream is a form of perception and understanding. But as you pointed out, it is not in the real material world. It is in ...

I too, am interested in dream and its connection with consciousness. The fact that in dreams we see objects and have surreal experience but without re...

Kant was talking about apperception in conjunction with intuition exclusively. He further divides apperception into pure apperception and empirical ap...

Provide the source supporting the claim preferably from the original text. Consider a case from dreams. You see yourself in your own dream, and it is ...

Isn't dream also a type of perception? You see things and hear sounds in dreams. But when you wake up, you realise and confirm there is no real object...

Too much generalisation. These days, women seem to be enjoying their freedom more than men. Protection is not a right word to describe the relationshi...

Is this what Kant said? Or is it what you think?

That sounds like a case of mistaken identity for chicken as a goose. At least they weren't denying the existence of what they were seeing. Your knowle...

You just confirmed that you know what you don't know. Therefore, you just proved the fact that you are not hallucinating.

You can deny seeing a cup, but you cannot deny you are seeing something which looks like a cup. You are not denying that you are seeing something, whi...

See my profile.

No, it is not. That is the proof the cup exists. I don't need a proof, because I know it is not an illusion or hallucination.

Because you cannot prove seeing a cup is an illusion or hallucination. Can you prove your seeing a cup is an illusion or hallucination?

The evidence was submitted to support the event in the real world as true statements which had taken place in the real world. It is an independent ver...

At this point, we can only assume and conclude that the questioner is engaging in "Argument by Refusal, Stubbornness or Denial", which means that the ...

You just make coffee in the cup, and drink it. If the cup was hallucinatory, then coffee will spill onto the table. If it holds coffee, and you cant d...

Unless you can prove you were in the state of illusion, delusion, hallucination or dream during your visual perception, if you see X, then X exists.

You just proved you exist. Yes.

1) The fact that they deny the fact proves they do exist. One cannot deny something without existing. When their body exists, naturally their hand exi...

2 questions. 1) Do they also deny the fact that their own body exists in a mind-independent world? 2) Whose mind are they talking about here?

From my recollection of the reading was, the concept of apperception was originally used by Leibniz and Locke to denote unconscious perceptions or per...

You can wave it, or grab a cup with the hand? You cannot deny the fact that you have a hand by that time?

Philosophy of mind is not neurology or biology. That was the point. There are clear divisions between the different subjects and methodology adopted.

The thinking "I" doesn't exist in every perception and sensation, so the above is downright wrong. But if you present the relevant quotes from the ori...

Still sounds wrong. Where did you pick up the definition? Do you have the original texts implying above?

Evidence can be fabricated and manipulated. Not always, but possible. Please read the post correctly. No one said that. You are saying it. There was n...

Another point. Science does not always offer absolute truths on all their claims. There are always prevalent and possible errors on their observations...

You should accept explanations supported by reasoning and logic. Faith is for religion. You seem to be confused between philosophical reasoning and re...

Not sure what you mean by that. That is not what Kant said, is it?

I am not particularly interested in biological structure of brain. It is not a topic for philosophy. Philosophy deals with rational analysis on the ab...

You are welcome. :) It is not something special. I just suddenly realised that consciousness is just a perception which perceives all the other percep...

I will try do so when I have more time. Recently got quite busy here, only was popping in briefly for short comments.

You don't need to accept if you don't want or disagree. But if you are interested in the topic, you would have a read, and think about it at least. To...

You need to read the original work of Kant, which is CPR, not some commentaries. There are thousands of commentaries by different folks on the Kant to...

Read on Apperception in Kant's terminology, and you might change your views.

That's close.

They are not consciousness. They are just mental states and activities. You can do all those without knowing you are doing them. Consciousness means y...

Fair enough. One of the philosophical methods is to read, and analyze writings in the discussion, and clarify any obscure or unverified concepts and s...

I just asked if that is the case. I didn't claim they are identical. You are not reading the posts accurately. My aim is not claiming or concluding. M...

Outside the universe sounds another unverified concept. What is outside the universe?

Can you extract the conjured up possible future from the hippocampus, and view it? If it is physical, then it should be possible for you to do so.

Do they mean that if you had your friend's brain, you will have his/her memories and imagination?

None of them tells what consciousness is.

Which neurons? What is actually happening when firing? How do they differ when seeing an apple and when seeing a cup? When imagining them and remember...