You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Corvus

Comments

When you open your hard drive, and look into all the parts inside the drive, you will see nothing which even remotely resembles the data you stored in...
July 21, 2025 at 21:45
Good point, but a daft question. It is like asking why tables and chairs don't work as phones or computers? They are not designed / made to do those j...
July 21, 2025 at 09:33
:up:
July 20, 2025 at 14:57
Could it be the past memory of the individual and reasoning ability in the brain, which tells and confirms the person with the self identity? Past mem...
July 20, 2025 at 14:57
I am even thinking that mind could be physical in its nature, i.e. mind is not different existence from our bodies. Because mind can only exist when b...
July 20, 2025 at 12:03
I don't think it was a reduction of any sort. When you reduce something, you make it less or simpler. I didn't make anything less or simpler in the po...
July 20, 2025 at 11:54
But without body, our consciousness evaporates into nothing. Our brain falls asleep every night, and when it does, the whole world of ours disappears ...
July 19, 2025 at 22:16
If there is no human mind, then there is no time. Time will end, if the last human dies on the earth.
July 19, 2025 at 21:56
My ideas seem to be based on natural logic rather than science. I don't deny science, but always be aware of the limitations of science. But yes, I do...
April 08, 2025 at 09:23
Why would it be impossible?
April 07, 2025 at 10:30
Problem with phenomenology is that it is another Kantian idealism without Thing-in-itself.
April 07, 2025 at 06:41
Most folks wouldn't need such information in their life on the earth. Especially if you were a Zarathustra in the remote mountain cave living alone, t...
April 07, 2025 at 06:38
I would rather agree with the world of Heideggerian or MP's, of which the structure or existence is disclosed or revealed by language. The world will ...
April 06, 2025 at 12:59
Science can only describe what are observable. The hidden and unobservable parts of the world for them are same as metaphysics i.e. conjecture, infere...
April 06, 2025 at 10:39
It is an interesting idea of W, but not sure if it is 100% correct. I feel the world has nothing to do with language or hinge proposition. The world i...
April 06, 2025 at 10:20
It is definitely the case that the Moon doesn't exist in me when I am seeing it. It exists out there in space somewhere. It also is the case that the ...
April 06, 2025 at 10:14
You need more than language for accurate understanding the world i.e. rational thinking and inferring with the observations on the reality. Language a...
April 05, 2025 at 15:54
Like the formal logic cannot capture or cope with the whole reality, language alone cannot capture or understand the world. Free reasoning based on in...
April 05, 2025 at 12:09
Not sure if being able to ride a bike should be regarded as knowledge based on the theory of knowing how. It should be regarded as an ability to inter...
April 05, 2025 at 10:17
Problem with hinge proposition is vagueness of its definition. There are other propositions that I don't doubt at all, and they are not hinge proposit...
April 05, 2025 at 08:41
Are you certain about the fact that you are not certain about anything?
April 04, 2025 at 09:57
There is your certainty. We don't normally make claims using hinge propositions in daily life. We only discuss about them in the philosophy games (as ...
April 03, 2025 at 16:46
They believe that doubts are also simulation.
April 03, 2025 at 11:16
I have heard about "lived experience", but not "lived truths". What is "lived truths"?
April 03, 2025 at 10:36
Descartes doubted everything including even his own existence. But one thing he could not doubt was the fact that he was doubting. The fact that he wa...
April 03, 2025 at 10:34
When we exit the language game, we are in the philosophical game where we discuss about all types of propositions if they make sense.
April 03, 2025 at 10:31
Revisiting on hinge propositions, they could still be doubted in theory since doubts can be methodological like that of Descartes, or psychological. A...
April 03, 2025 at 10:28
What are the philosophical / epistemological / logical grounds for hinge propositions being exempt from doubt?
April 02, 2025 at 15:11
:ok: :up:
April 02, 2025 at 08:56
Isn't evolution from living biological species to the same living biological species but for the better adaptation for the survival in the given envir...
April 01, 2025 at 22:02
You don't. It was a suggestion for W if he used the word "impossible" rather than "exempt", it would have been clearer in the point. "Exempt" is norma...
April 01, 2025 at 21:55
:ok: Seems to be delicate nuance in the uses, but the gist of the claim seems it is impossible to doubt? FYI, USA has 23 towns and cities called Paris...
April 01, 2025 at 13:53
What is the illocutionary difference between the two expressions?
April 01, 2025 at 13:10
I understand W said that hinge propositions / certainties cannot be doubted or are not allowed doubting. I don't agree with that. Anything and everyth...
April 01, 2025 at 11:53
There are different types of doubts too i.e. rational doubts based on reasoning, and psychological doubts based on feelings, emotions and beliefs. Whe...
April 01, 2025 at 11:21
But it cannot explain the origin of existence of the Earth and life, can it?
April 01, 2025 at 08:06
There are different types of "I know". I think I know, I feel I know, I believe I know, I am sure I know. I know I know. IOW, "I know" always comes wi...
April 01, 2025 at 07:32
The big-bang theory must have had been inferred from the observations on the other galaxies with their old stars dying with the explosion, then the ne...
April 01, 2025 at 07:14
Excellent explanation. :up:
April 01, 2025 at 07:08
When someone is pointing out on the the possible misuse or unclarity of the concept in use, they are not necessarily seeking for help. They were looki...
March 31, 2025 at 13:49
Refer to 1) The Oxford Companion To Philosophy Edited by Ted Honderich 2) Philosophical Logic by Sylbil Wolfram for coherence concepts. Bye~~
March 31, 2025 at 11:34
You need to read this post to understand the concept of coherence. Anyhow, I am stalked by the emotionally motivated poster here, so I am not going to...
March 31, 2025 at 11:30
OK, it is up to you, whether accept it or not. Just pointed out the unclear use of the concept "coherence". Carry on~ :)
March 31, 2025 at 11:22
You need to read some basic philosophical logic books.
March 31, 2025 at 11:15
Please refer to the book on "coherence theory of truth" by by Cybil Wolfram, Philosophical Logic (London 1989)
March 31, 2025 at 11:14
I have already given you a clear explanation on coherence here.
March 31, 2025 at 11:06
Your way of argument is just keep denying everything blindly. You don't accept or see the rational points.
March 31, 2025 at 11:03
I don't need help. You do need help. :D
March 31, 2025 at 11:01
Your seeing a cup in a location is a subjective visual experience. It has no truth value. It is just a perception. When you make up a statement "I see...
March 31, 2025 at 10:35
Magic is the created illusion. As long as the illusion exists, magic exists.
March 31, 2025 at 10:20