Corvus

Banno, we all know that you keep scanning other folks messages for sussing out the irrelevant grounds for your attacks. If you are honest, you will se...

Calm down Banno. This is The Philosophy Forum. :nerd:

Seriously this is your problem Banno. You think you are a teacher, and the rest of the members are the students. But you have no knowledge of the fiel...

Well, you keep running away from the question with smoky gibberish. How time works? Why do you suddenly want to know how time works? Please elaborate ...

Do you agree the orders and rules must be expressed in sentences, and the sentences must have truth values to be effective as the orders and rules?

I have asked you first, but you never answered my question. Is this the way you evade the question which will collapse all your points?

Do you agree the orders must be expressed in sentences, and the sentences must have truth values to be effective as the orders?

You must be joking telling anyone putting your sentence into logic. Are you Descartes?

I am just telling you what is correct from the muddles that you folks have been spewing out. I am not trying to get out from anything like some of the...

That doesn't prove anything at all. If you exist, you can think, or you don't have to think. It just means, in order for you think, prior to that, you...

What's the point of that? What would anyone gain translating what you are saying into logic? You say it is order, not logic. That is nonsense. Orders ...

I am not sure what you mean here. You obviously are avoiding to answer for the question whether you agree or disagree with the example propositional l...

Sentence is the basic constituent of Logic. What do you think Logic is?

The only basis for your claim, they are not, is because no scholar says D's argument is contradictory? Your claims on D seem to be based on some type ...

Do you agree or disagree with this logic? If red light, then drive away. R -> D If not red light, then don't drive away. Not R -> Not D is False There...

His wild imagination has no ground. Just someone said his native language is Korean doesn't prove that he is a Korean. His repeated meaningless citing...

Far more wild premises are made up and forwarded as some reasons why the contradiction reasoning is not the case by the other folks. Those are not sai...

You don't seem to know even the difference between validity and truth.

The tree generator you keep brining in doesn't deal with applying the contradiction reasoning. It just generates trees and checks for validity. It can...

Logic books? That's a poor logic of you again. If someone with poor logic or weird mind wrote some logic books and published (anyone can publish books...

Who else is saying what you have been saying? Although, it doesn't matter how many folks are saying the same thing. Ultimately what matters is the tru...

No, that is not my game. You mistook me for some other folks in the thread. I am just trying to understand your logic here. There are parts in your cl...

Are you still claiming that when you stop thinking, you cease to exist is true? I am saying that is False. Rocks existing without thinking is totally ...

It is not about follow. It is about introducing assertion and inference.

I am. :nerd: Banno claims that he ceases to exist when he doesn't think. :rofl:

If that is how you see it, you are wrong. I am only interested in the philosophical discussions based on reasoning. Nothing else will interest me in t...

(¬t?¬e) is definitely False in the Cogito case, which makes (t?e) False too. No one with right mind would agree that, when he stops thinking, he cease...

How is it tell you nothing? It is a result from the principle of contradiction in proof process. If it rains, then the ground is wet. It doesn't rain....

But if you cannot prove, or refuse to prove your claims of "Am thinking", it means nothing to anyone apart from to yourself. It would be like talking ...

But here are we not talking about "I"? - "Cogito"? We are not talking about rocks and bricks here. Of course I deny its Truth. It is FALSE. That is on...

If you don't think, you don't exist. Is this not False? Even if you don' think, but you still do exist. No?

Therefore (¬t?¬e) = F ?

Logical validity is only relevant, if Cogito had been deduced from some premises. But it hadn't. The only premise of Cogito was Descartes has doubted ...

But you see that even a simple logical formalisation and reasoning of Cogito, proves it is false.

(t?e)?(¬t?¬e) (¬t?¬e) = F hence (t?e) = F Would you agree on that? Ignore the MP nonsense. It is not relevant here.

It sounds a contradiction. Another contradiction with K. is his emphasis on human relationship with God. From what I read about existentialism, the ex...

But what could anyone do about the determinants and constraints?

Fair enough. I got email from the forum that you quoted me in your post, and I also read in your post you saying my logic is wrong in somewhere. So I ...

You are back in my To-Ignore list. Bye~

I will speak to Banno when he comes back with his replies. But I don't speak to the folks who throws the out of context muck vulgarity in the discussi...

Just talk to Banno. I will leave you to it.

You are back to your old habit of throwing the muck vulgarity again here instead of seeing the point.

You seem to have read something about MP on the internet and been parroting about it here until cows come home. You don't seem to know how to apply lo...

Nope, never said anything like that in this thread. You must be dreaming, or believing that everything in the arguments and explanations were poems.

If you can recall, it had been explained repeatedly over and over again.

Well you insisted, Banno's post was addressed to you, so I will wait until Banno gets up from his sleep, and comes back with his explanations. Then af...

It was a metaphor. :) But it is far higher class than some of your nonsense insults even with vulgarity in the past.

But do you not understand the fact P -> Q has not TF value at the stage? You shouldn't be brining in some internet truth table here. This is tragic th...

Let's see what he has to say about it.

My discussion to Banno is totally separate matter to yours, as I am only interested in clarifying Banno point in his logic at this particular stage.