You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Metaphysician Undercover

Comments

No challenge is too great for the cosmetic industry, so there is no such thing as "aesthetically-challenged".
January 24, 2023 at 11:50
I think pageantry has always been an important part of musical performance. You'll find that it pervades and persists throughout time, from the liturg...
January 24, 2023 at 02:43
Oh I think we should all fear the wand waving Wafarer.
January 24, 2023 at 02:00
Well pull out that banning stick, and we'll see you in the Bannings thread, where you can display some gumption and muscle.
January 24, 2023 at 01:55
There is no basic problem here. All that is required is good honest observations, and this is fundamental to science anyway. So, in the same way that ...
January 24, 2023 at 01:47
Keep up the good work Wayf.
January 24, 2023 at 01:05
I would like to see a study on the effects of placing cats under video surveillance. We know from reality TV shows that creatures tend to act differen...
January 24, 2023 at 00:41
The way I see it is that there is in human beings, a base animal instinct toward false fronts. It may be derived from competitive factors, fear, or wh...
January 23, 2023 at 12:49
Yes, I'd agree to that. I think we adequately understand each other. I'll tell you what I think is the principal point of difference between my perspe...
January 22, 2023 at 12:51
The problem though, is that it is only a possibility, that I am trying to deceive you. And you state a conditional, "if you are trying to deceive us.....
January 21, 2023 at 20:45
I think there is a very clear difficulty here. A "narrative" is a description of events occurring in a chronological order. We can produce a narrative...
January 20, 2023 at 13:36
This is difficult, and I am trying to understand exactly what is meant here. The last line suggests a clear division between belief and values, as if ...
January 20, 2023 at 02:53
The problem is that "potential" is a very difficult concept, and it's meaning will vary greatly depending on its ontological context. So, the way that...
January 19, 2023 at 13:35
Isn't that the point of such a discussion, to explore the interpretations of others? If I don't "double down" (which really means explain why I interp...
January 19, 2023 at 12:21
This is why human understanding of sense objects is always deficient. The intellect understands a form which is distinct from the form of the sense ob...
January 18, 2023 at 14:44
I think that this is an idealist principle which accounts for the assumed fact that an object is a creation of the human mind. The act of individualiz...
January 18, 2023 at 13:49
I believe this is the issue of "authenticity", which Heidegger dealt with to a considerable extent. You might think that the individual can look at on...
January 18, 2023 at 01:27
I disagree with the generality of this statement. It is very clear, that many things will stimulate numerous people. So many things constitute stimuli...
January 17, 2023 at 23:11
This seems to show that Kelly is fundamentally wrong, if you've made an accurate representation. The most formative period in a person's life is befor...
January 17, 2023 at 13:58
I'm not familiar with any authors who have taken this perspective directly. Is this a sort of negative pragmaticism? Pragmaticism takes the desired en...
January 16, 2023 at 11:47
Uh-oh, does my refusal to accept the Americanism of my spell-check subject me to the possibility of banning? I always thought "practice" is a noun and...
January 16, 2023 at 11:16
We've already explained to you why this cannot be the case. It is a false premise. Now I've moved on from that, to describe the difference between a p...
January 16, 2023 at 00:34
What I said, is that if "this lectern" is identified by essential properties, then "this lectern refers to a type rather than a particular. That is be...
January 15, 2023 at 22:56
The need for this judgement, as to which properties are essential and which are accidental, is what is eliminated by the law of identity. This law put...
January 15, 2023 at 13:40
Oh I strongly agree, it's very important, not a snoozer. In this world of electronic communication we need to practise the skill of respectfulness, be...
January 14, 2023 at 23:37
When the object "requires a new description", it is because it has changed, therefore it's not "at the same time". It's not at the same time, it's ove...
January 14, 2023 at 23:28
I believe that the issue here is that face to face discussion is fundamentally more civil than the distanced interaction on a computer screen. When we...
January 14, 2023 at 13:11
Matter and form are combined in the material world. A material object has both matter and form. This principle is known as Aristotle's hylomorphism. I...
January 14, 2023 at 12:33
Yes, each thing is identical with itself, everything is what it is. And, things are changing as time passes. Therefore being identical with itself, or...
January 14, 2023 at 11:57
This is the problem, isn't it? The noise is occurring within, and we don't even need the outside to have the infinite feedback referred to by Art. One...
January 14, 2023 at 03:04
The way I see it, numerical values are values just like ethical values are values. So there is a broad meaning of "value", which is roughly speaking, ...
January 14, 2023 at 00:36
I'd agree with this. It is actually quite common to have beliefs without logic or evidence to support them. You do realize that mathematics works with...
January 13, 2023 at 22:58
You continue to demonstrate that you have no idea what the law of identity actually states. You state your rendition as "A=A", but you continue to sho...
January 13, 2023 at 22:37
This is the difficulty. The law of identity allows that a thing could continue to be the same thing, despite undergoing change. That is the temporal e...
January 13, 2023 at 18:23
In exchange, you can call me "the obfuscator". That's fun too. Sorry, @"Jamal", I've gone off topic and need moderation. Someone needs to summon @"the...
January 13, 2023 at 13:54
@"Wayfarer" Do you mind if I refer to you as "the woo-peddler"? That's a fun name. It beats "the crank". I see why @"BC" changed names.
January 13, 2023 at 13:24
I agree. I don't see the point. They just start calling you "the crackpot" or "the crank", or some other name, when they'd prefer not to engage with y...
January 13, 2023 at 13:21
But this is what leads to misunderstanding and confusion. That's what Plato showed in his dialogues. Different people all 'know how to use' the same w...
January 13, 2023 at 12:49
That's right, as it should be, as Janus indicates. That's because if the lectern we are talking about is in the other room, it is a different lectern ...
January 13, 2023 at 12:28
I think the common standard is to attribute personal preferences to genetic predisposition. This predisposition may get amplified through practise and...
January 13, 2023 at 01:52
We've had a similar situation in Canada, spats between manufacturers and retailers. Recently Loblaw (Canada's largest grocer) refused to stock Frito-L...
January 13, 2023 at 01:41
I think that the vast majority of knowledge is not "about reality". Knowledge mostly consists of how to do things. You being pragmatist must recognize...
January 13, 2023 at 01:14
Being made of wood is not essential of being a lectern. However, if we are talking about a particular thing, that lectern in particular, then every pr...
January 13, 2023 at 00:35
The problem is that science consistently employs speculative metaphysical propositions, in the form of the hypotheses which it tests. The scientific m...
January 12, 2023 at 22:50
Kripke's misuse of "necessary" is very well displayed at the point where he states "if the table is not made of ice, it is necessarily not made of ice...
January 12, 2023 at 13:48
I would say that blind spots are intrinsic to the nature of theoretical knowledge. Theoretical knowledge has limitations, and when the knowledge is pu...
January 12, 2023 at 13:05
Actually it's your conclusion which is non-sequitur. The scientist, just like everyone else in the world is confronted with problems which are not sci...
January 12, 2023 at 02:51
Sure, but we need to differentiate between being valid and being sound. From what I understand, valid logic means that the conclusion follows necessar...
January 12, 2023 at 02:13
You seem to misunderstand. Neuroscience has a blind spot, I think that's obvious, as described by the analogy of @"Olivier5". Having a blind spot, wha...
January 12, 2023 at 02:04
We could start with the basic fallacy, non sequitur, which means that the conclusion does not follow from the premises, or that the reasoning is not v...
January 12, 2023 at 01:42