I did that already. https://thephilosophyforum.com/discussion/comment/1027665 Truth is determined by the model,, The model is a product, imaginary. Un...
OK, so truth is defined as within the model, so we haven't gotten to anything to support the assumption of a real, or actual world, or truth by corres...
That's right. It's exactly what I pointed out in my post. I don't care what you call it, a "semantic model" if you want. However, if you choose to use...
Why would you say that. There's nothing wrong with drinking beer from a huge glass. I can't say I have one quite that big though. But why wouldn't the...
In the way that "true" is used in your definition of "possibly", how does "truths we don't know" say anything meaningful? Since truth is relative to t...
From the perspective of truth by correspondence, these appears to be incoherent. How can we talk about things being true in more than one world, when ...
You have not yet defined "possible" to support this, as I asked. What you are saying here is that "it is possible that we know X" is implied by "we kn...
That is not the issue. The question is whether at the same time, "We know shit", and "It is possible that we know shit", could both be judge to be tru...
Check this: President Donald Trump said Friday that he will be pardoning former Honduran President Juan Orlando Hernandez, who in 2024 was convicted f...
In the fridge, a head of cabbage will keep from the fall until the spring. It's incredible, I don't know how it does it. Sauerkraut may be your best o...
Look at the temporality of your statements; "it might have been that we did not know stuff", refers to past time. All three of the propositions refer ...
I don't see how any of your free floating quotes from Aristotle are relevant, because you and I are discussing epistemic possibility, and your quotes ...
Another fine example of sophistic abuse of language. The correct statement would be ... if we know that p, it is not possible that we know that p is p...
You tend to ignore mentions, so I've reverted to reverse psychology. It seems to be working. Yes, I assumed that was the perspective you were taking f...
I see you're still having difficulty understanding. Either that or you've retreated into some form of denial. So, let me lay it out very succinctly. T...
That's exactly right. "Knowable" excludes "known" because knowable allows for "not-known". Every proposition which I know, is actually known, that's w...
It is very obvious that the difference between actual and possible indicates that if p is knowable (possible to be known), then p is not known. Conver...
You obviously didn't address what I wrote. And, it appears like you didn't even attempt to understand what I wrote. Despite pretending to consider wha...
@"Sirius" Here's an illustration to demonstrate what I'm talking about. Suppose we take a simple proposition P, and say that it is possible. We theref...
After years of explaining very similar issues to Banno, Banno simply chooses to ignore, rejecting Aristotelian bullshit. As you accurately point out, ...
You don't recognize how Trump is obsessed with oil? "Drill, baby, drill." And, "We will export American energy all over the world." In Trump's mind, o...
That's somewhat incomplete. Don't forget chicken wings. Chicken wings went from being the cheapest meat on the bird, (you practically had to give them...
Go ahead, laughing is good. You know, when Trump first jumped in, to run for president 10 years ago, we thought it was such a big joke, and laughed so...
Perhaps, by denying the reality of the unity which is the prerequisite presupposition for "the world", I allow that there is a very real separation be...
I'd say he's well above average in his interpretation of Aristotle. Relative to the way that I understand Aristotle though, I think that he doesn't qu...
Right, therefore intention is implied. Is that difficult to understand? I would make the opposite conclusion, The conscious mind, along with the purpo...
I made it through the majority of the lectures. There is very good background material here. He develops the concept of mediation, which he claims is ...
Domestic and social harmony: "And did we tell you the name of the game, boy? We call it riding the gravy train" Some notes in the harmony are a little...
I do not understand how you can make this division, the separation between "the human acting in history", and, "In nature/human nature". Isn't it the ...
What do you mean? I don't understand this. If judging itself is inherent, then we have to account for this or else our assumption of what is natural i...
But isn't judging inherent within or nature? It's just what we do, we judge all sorts of things. Are you saying that we have a natural tendency to jud...
I don't think you're getting the point J. Most likely, you could keep on saying this, and never get "institutionalized". And, people very often get in...
I look at this perspective as very problematic. "Purpose" is usually defined by "intention", and "intention" is defined by "a goal", or "aim". This im...
The probability of that is extremely low. The vast majority of people speeding would have no consequences. And even if not speeding, one could still d...
I don't see that there are any "stern consequences" in the case of ordinary language. It's just like in my example of the speed signs, where there is ...
You liken the lichen, javi? Lichen is actually an extremely interesting form of composite organism. "Composite organism" is a strange concept in itsel...
What evolutionary theory provides in relation to intent, in my opinion, is a better understanding of how intent underlies all living beings, and how c...
I don't see how ordinary language could be misused, because the nature of "ordinary language" is that there are no regulations to distinguish between ...
Comments