You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Metaphysician Undercover

Comments

I think this displays a misunderstanding of "intention". Contingent means dependent on a preceding cause, but the will (intention) is understood to be...
January 06, 2024 at 12:24
Intrinsic to "ambiguity" is the fact that there is no correct interpretation. It is common in general, and especially here at TPF where we assert corr...
January 06, 2024 at 12:10
Until we come up with a clear description of what time is, this statement cannot be justified
January 06, 2024 at 03:07
I always thought it was the Jones's. Or are the Jones's the ones who are always one step ahead of the Johnsons?
January 06, 2024 at 02:54
Circular motion is a very strange sort. Traction is often less than a hundred percent, so the motion of that point on the wheel, relative to the groun...
January 06, 2024 at 02:42
If you are asking if I know what God's intentions were, the answer is no I do not. Otherwise, the answer is in the way that I've already described, a ...
January 06, 2024 at 02:30
Twenty-odd times? Wow. It seems the mentioned time, "fight like hell", suffices for what you ask. Why not accept it?
January 06, 2024 at 02:22
So this is your mode of interpretation? Every time the word "fight" is used it is metaphorical, and not meant to conjure up any notions of physical ag...
January 05, 2024 at 13:44
Determining that something is infinite (such as eternal time) solves no problem. It just means that the theory being applied toward understanding the ...
January 05, 2024 at 13:18
No, that's why I was clear to differentiate between two senses of "necessary". It was necessary in the sense of needed. For example, if I want to walk...
January 05, 2024 at 12:42
I agree that's an interesting subject. Also you might notice that the God of The Old Testament was always jealous and angry, displaying these human em...
January 05, 2024 at 03:07
Right, from our perspective it is "necessary" in the sense of 'what we have is what we got, and things are not otherwise'. From God's perspective, pri...
January 05, 2024 at 00:38
This is a very misleading statement. To say there is distance between two objects is completely different from saying that there is space between two ...
January 04, 2024 at 23:08
Yes I read that, and it is why I accused you of being ambiguous with "distance". In the first sentence you said there is a distance "even if we never ...
January 04, 2024 at 14:07
I don't see any evidence that God wanted anything other than what He created. We are agreeing that it is logically possible that God could have create...
January 04, 2024 at 13:02
Sorry, but there is no willful misunderstanding. What you said simply makes not sense. I ask you, how can you demonstrate that beginnings are not logi...
January 04, 2024 at 03:32
It is you who is being ambiguous, with your use of "distance". If the word is meant to signify that there is a separation between the base of the moun...
January 04, 2024 at 00:22
You'd have to be more specific in your question for me to give a reply, but off the cuff, I'd say that possible world semantics is inappropriate for d...
January 03, 2024 at 13:52
This is why, in metaphysics, it is important to understand that a thing must have actually been measured in order to have a measurement. As in the exa...
January 03, 2024 at 13:46
It's not possible that God created a different world, because the world that we have is the world that God created. However, at the time when God was ...
January 03, 2024 at 02:41
No. How would you draw that conclusion?
January 03, 2024 at 02:22
By what Walter stipulated, A and B are incompatible, so not only is it impossible that such is necessary, I would say that it is not even possible tha...
January 03, 2024 at 01:20
How would you know if 101 was actually spelled backward or not? How would we know if all those people like Banno who appear to be looking backward are...
January 03, 2024 at 01:15
I think we're back to the beginning, and you are just going around in a circle. God only makes one of the two choices, A or B. The choice was A. So we...
January 03, 2024 at 01:07
A ruler has markings, it might say "inch", or it may not. I don't see the relevance, an act of measurement was required to produce that marking. Remin...
January 02, 2024 at 22:53
In: Bannings  — view comment
Very good logic. We are all right therefore we all agree.
January 02, 2024 at 13:30
I think you are misunderstanding what is meant by "God's Will". The will is the source of action, as the cause. So there is only a will to create A (c...
January 02, 2024 at 13:26
That's a mistaken idea. Measurements need to be made, and measurement is an act which requires time. The simple fact that any measurement requires tim...
January 02, 2024 at 13:11
The distance from the peak does not change without a change in location, and this requires time. What you can say, that the distance to the peak (heig...
January 02, 2024 at 03:32
In: Bannings  — view comment
And of course, there's the hypocritical anti-philosophy types who don't wish to be doing philosophy, and even claim not to be doing philosophy, while ...
January 02, 2024 at 03:11
I just cannot see how you could possibly come to this conclusion from what i said. There is a first material thing, it's called "the universe", and it...
January 02, 2024 at 00:49
OMG! You inspired me to check my own count. I'm two posts a way from 12,000. Make that one... Gotta go, I'm very busy, I have another post to do.
January 01, 2024 at 22:54
You have not been saying that God is red or blue, you have been saying that God can choose to create A or B. The property we are talking about is a pr...
January 01, 2024 at 22:50
In: Bannings  — view comment
Anti-philosophy! That sounds like very good reason for banning from an explicitly philosophy forum, to me.
January 01, 2024 at 22:33
The type of mother in question here is explicitly the mother of a human being. So the infinite supply you suggest as a possibility, would imply that h...
January 01, 2024 at 22:27
The limit to a type is completely different from the cause of an individual. So what Russell shows is that switching from individuals to types is noth...
January 01, 2024 at 14:04
A fine example of not accurately being in the right place at the right time. Damn those gravitational waves. If that's what it takes to keep those gra...
January 01, 2024 at 13:36
As you said, God does not will both A and B, God wills one or the other. Therefore we cannot conclude that there is two Gods.
January 01, 2024 at 12:51
That the cause is unknown to us does not imply that there is no cause. In general, this is the problem with free will, and intention, as "cause", we d...
December 31, 2023 at 12:57
So, how do you perceive this to be a problem? If God had created B instead of A, then there would be B instead of A. How is that a problem for divine ...
December 31, 2023 at 12:15
Realistically... for the rest of your (hopefully) long, healthy, and happy life.
December 31, 2023 at 02:56
How is that a problem? God created (or actualized) B, and God did not create (or actualize A). Where's the problem?
December 30, 2023 at 22:13
I don't understand your point. Let's say that at t1 God wills to create A, and at t2 God wills to create B. We could say that A and B are each a part ...
December 30, 2023 at 15:59
This does not produce the problem you mentioned. If God's intention is to create A, then A is created, and if God's intention is to create B, then B i...
December 29, 2023 at 21:50
I don't see how you can introduce possible worlds to the scenario. What God wills is necessary by His act of willing it, therefore it is actual. You c...
December 29, 2023 at 12:43
Sure, the speed of light is constant, but as is the case with all motion, the speed is always relative to a frame of reference. That's why your statem...
December 29, 2023 at 12:18
The issue I see with the "expansion of space", is that in order to conceive of numerous distinct locations from which everything is receding, it is ne...
December 29, 2023 at 02:57
The speed of light is relative. It is the same relative to any frame of reference. That's the principle which allowed Einstein to include the motion o...
December 29, 2023 at 02:39
According to Wikipedia, "proper speed" is the speed from the observer's frame of reference, which in your example, would be equivalent to "relative to...
December 28, 2023 at 13:42
That's what I'm talking about, a mind open to the possibility of solving the problems rather than denying that the problems exist. This image you prop...
December 28, 2023 at 13:27