You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Metaphysician Undercover

Comments

You seem to have missed a key point Sapientia: "we assume that there is something which was meant". Minds are the things which make assumptions, so "w...
November 23, 2016 at 21:13
The appearance of a thing charging me is the appearance of a thing charging me. It could kill me. This thing affects me, how does that produce the log...
November 23, 2016 at 20:20
Ever heard of God? Human judgements are fallible, God's are not. What your example here demonstrates, is that there is no truth without God. There may...
November 23, 2016 at 15:45
Your understanding of categorical separation is incompatible with mine. To me, if things are separated categorically, there is no crossing over or in ...
November 23, 2016 at 14:28
The point was, that this "the world" is something which is produced, and assumed by us. We assume that there is something out there which exists indep...
November 23, 2016 at 13:26
I don't think that it is the case that "interpretation" implies necessarily that there is a truth to that which is interpreted. Since we live in a wor...
November 23, 2016 at 12:52
Don't you think that we mostly assume that there is some kind of "truth" which is beyond our interpretations? So despite the way we interpret things, ...
November 23, 2016 at 04:58
Where I live, using the phone is involved in more fatal accidents than alcohol. The statistic for alcohol is far less than 80%. Is this supposed to be...
November 22, 2016 at 20:35
Here's the difficulty right here. Let's say that the author intended to write all the symbols exactly as they appear on the paper. That is exactly wha...
November 22, 2016 at 14:13
Let me get this straight then, you have one mother category "vagueness", and any other category is assumed to exist as a subset of this category.
November 22, 2016 at 12:47
Now my point, Andrew M. Appeals to identity do not support the real existence of the apple. "Identity" claims, asserts, or presupposes existence, but ...
November 22, 2016 at 12:45
I don't agree with this. A categorical separation is not a distinction of co-dependency or complementary limits. The opposing terms, which describe th...
November 22, 2016 at 03:35
That's not their meaning though, that the writer wrote the symbols in a certain way. The meaning is not the "way" that they are written, because this ...
November 22, 2016 at 03:01
Isn't that switching categories though? If we put a thing into a context of other things, to validate its existence, isn't it a category error to atte...
November 22, 2016 at 01:49
The "existence" of the particle is validated by its context, within the apparatus. The "existence" of the apparatus is validated by placing it within ...
November 21, 2016 at 22:33
Fair enough. If you read my earlier posts, I suggested we could question the existence of the "particle", just like we can question the existence of o...
November 21, 2016 at 22:14
Complementarity applies to the attributes of an object. To say, as you did, 'there is no particle travelling through the apparatus" is to say that the...
November 21, 2016 at 13:38
Ok. so let's assume that there is no particle, I'm cool with that. Isn't that what you say here, "there is no particle"? Wait a minute, I thought the ...
November 21, 2016 at 05:02
When one refers to "the apple", that individual is referring to a particular instance of temporal continuity in which the similitude of an apple is of...
November 21, 2016 at 04:45
In: Work  — view comment
My time spent working, earning a living, is a significant part of my life. If that hugely significant portion of my life was not somehow making a cont...
November 20, 2016 at 17:30
Your claim though, is that to not choose, which is actually to exercise the will power, (and this is often necessary to resist the temptation of makin...
November 20, 2016 at 17:10
A fictitious explanation is even easier than a fictitious description, because empirical evidence relates directly to the description, not the explana...
November 20, 2016 at 16:47
You don't seem to understand Agustino, that to resist the temptation to choose is just as much an act of willing as it is to choose freely. This we ca...
November 20, 2016 at 14:32
If you read my posts, what I contest is the assumption that the particle, or any object in general exists. To talk about any paths of the object is po...
November 20, 2016 at 14:18
It is an either-or, you're just in denial. You're claiming that the only possible starting point for meaningful discussion, is the premise that things...
November 20, 2016 at 14:00
I think the issues with QM, especially the MWI, indicate quite clearly that things do not exist in the same way "that most reasonable people" think th...
November 20, 2016 at 03:54
Great, thanks B.C., I like that one, think I'll use it on regular basis to attack all the mediocrity in the world. Because you are lukewarm I will spi...
November 19, 2016 at 22:09
I don't think this is true. Our memories are often inaccurate, especially concerning things distant in time. It's as if we tend to remember things the...
November 19, 2016 at 21:08
Let me explain very slowly and carefully then. There's a bunch of symbols written on a piece of paper. These symbols could mean absolutely anything. F...
November 19, 2016 at 17:58
You're sick, and so is Kierkegaard if he really believed that is better to take bad action than to take no action at all. Don't you think that an evil...
November 19, 2016 at 17:41
Clearly spite does not necessitate that one seeks to harm another. However, it is to wish that the other does meet harm, and that's why it's called an...
November 19, 2016 at 13:35
You do realize that to spite is to wish ill will on another, and this is completely contrary to the principal precept of Christianity, do you not?
November 19, 2016 at 13:13
Unless the described action is actually good, it makes no sense to refer to it as "infinitely better". Since "spite" is not good, you could have claim...
November 19, 2016 at 13:05
But in my post, I questioned the existence of all objects, so referring to molecules doesn't change anything. It is likely that the appearance of an o...
November 19, 2016 at 12:58
By being one of them? He would have accused them of rigging the election. Actually, he already asserted that the election was rigged, so what does tha...
November 19, 2016 at 12:21
Don't shoot the messenger.
November 19, 2016 at 05:11
OK, I gave you my explanation, concerning the nature of statements and symbols. What more do you want? One meaning of the word "statement" is to use i...
November 19, 2016 at 01:05
When one of the members of the discussion is claiming that the only important thing about the things being discussed is that which is not obvious, par...
November 18, 2016 at 20:51
You asked me to answer the question, that I did. I also gave you the reasons for my answer. if you wanted an argument you should have asked for it. Th...
November 18, 2016 at 20:39
OK, so let's take imaginary numbers for example. I think that this is a convention which is disputable. You seem to think otherwise. Therefore it woul...
November 18, 2016 at 20:26
OK, let's assume that you've created a proper equivalency here. Let's say that conventions which are universally agreed upon are necessarily of one ca...
November 18, 2016 at 12:09
You forgot one important option. Is the photon real? The option is not that QM is necessarily false, the option is that the interpretation of the phot...
November 18, 2016 at 11:08
That's true, but what I was pointing to was the importance of sameness, as the basis of equality, as a moral principle. Sameness is an assumed absolut...
November 18, 2016 at 03:40
So are you saying that things which we take for granted are insignificant and trivial? I think the opposite is the case. The things we take for grante...
November 18, 2016 at 03:20
All material existence can be reduced to potential. The concept of energy does this. If this is reality, that all material existence is simply potenti...
November 18, 2016 at 00:33
I don't think that's the case, as I don't think that difference and similarity can be properly opposed such as to have co-dependent or reciprocal rela...
November 18, 2016 at 00:17
Yes, it depended on a mind to be produced, written on the paper, and without a mind to read and interpret it in the future, it is just symbols on the ...
November 17, 2016 at 23:11
I don't imply that the difference is unimportant, what I imply is that the similarity is more important than the difference. Therefore I thought Wayfa...
November 17, 2016 at 22:41
We know that mathematical conventions come into existence. There was a time when there was no zero, no algebra, no calculus. So it's not true to say t...
November 17, 2016 at 11:56