You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Mongrel

Comments

So you're echoing what TGW said.. that it's an if/then situation.
December 14, 2016 at 13:50
But rule following has to be anchored somewhere. Quine showed (in Truth by Convention) that in regard to application of logic, the anchor can't be any...
December 14, 2016 at 13:48
So let's say I have a model M of the actual world from start to finish. Any proposition that is true of M entails ALL other propositions that are true...
December 14, 2016 at 13:44
Well true propositions represent aspects of the actual world.. What do false propositions represent? Some of them could be said to represent other pos...
December 14, 2016 at 13:42
I think they're already dead.
December 14, 2016 at 13:36
Would it be possible to model the actual world?
December 14, 2016 at 04:30
I'll have to ponder this. Just as an aside.. you're sounding a little like Yoda.
December 14, 2016 at 04:24
When it comes to applying logic, there is certainty by virtue of the knowledge of necessity or uncertainty by virtue of ignorance. The world is physic...
December 14, 2016 at 04:20
Sure. You can be deflationist.
December 14, 2016 at 04:12
Well look at the pacifist now.. all hawk when it comes to the poor orcs who can't help being evil... like Germans.
December 14, 2016 at 04:03
Uncertainty on the part of whom?
December 14, 2016 at 03:54
The given always appears against a background of other possible worlds?
December 14, 2016 at 03:54
"Proposition" sounds math-like and logical to me. And it's probably as close to philosophy of math as I ever really need to get. But you're right.. me...
December 14, 2016 at 03:52
I'm disturbed by the fact that the enemy is hell-spawn, so our heroes can get their slaughter on without worrying about killing somebody's father or b...
December 14, 2016 at 03:45
Again, you're sort of acting like propositions are objects of superstition... as if they're fairies magically making meaning where there was none. The...
December 14, 2016 at 03:33
One doesn't even know what proposition is being expressed unless the context of utterance is known. John said "2 is a prime number." Bill said, pointi...
December 14, 2016 at 02:31
Agustino, he's your boy. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PsO6ZnUZI0g
December 14, 2016 at 01:04
Two different propositions were expressed. An utterance is sounds or marks, generally... not really a good candidate for truth-bearer. Propositions do...
December 14, 2016 at 00:57
After 9-11 I did a lot of speculation about why somebody would run an airplane into a skyscraper. My thought was that the notion of being all caught u...
December 13, 2016 at 18:49
No I suppose not. The showing there would be a matter of reviewing the history of Islam, talking about it's present manifestations in the world which ...
December 13, 2016 at 13:48
I'm having trouble following this... sorry. Consider agreement. Two people are willing to assert the same truth-bearer. It can't be that they're willi...
December 13, 2016 at 13:06
[ I think that's a mischaracterization. Separation of church and state is a strategy for creating social stability. It was hard for some Christians to...
December 13, 2016 at 12:58
What do you mean by "attached" there?
December 12, 2016 at 23:47
You mean use meaning as truth-bearers? How would that differ from using propositions? And it's cool if you want to continue the conversation here. I r...
December 12, 2016 at 22:52
In Frege's argument an infinite regress appears with any attempt to define truth. It's not just Correspondence. It's any definition. I wrote out Frege...
December 12, 2016 at 22:50
You have a Trump-complex. I'm just sayin'
December 12, 2016 at 22:46
M: My dog exists. D: Dogs have two ears. P: My dog has two ears. My dog is a truthmaker for P. The representation M entails P. Right?
December 12, 2016 at 20:51
I'm not following you. Propositions that haven't been judged are neither true nor false?
December 12, 2016 at 18:57
I didn't read BC as saying Trump is mentally ill. My diagnosis is that you defend him because you want to be him. His father taught him that there are...
December 12, 2016 at 18:30
My favorite Kierkegaard translator uses "virtue" that way. "There was one who was great by virtue of his power." and so on. "By virtue of" is apt to m...
December 12, 2016 at 15:11
The SEP article explores the pros and cons of a number of truthmaker candidates. Entailment is one that gets shot down. I was trying to understand wha...
December 12, 2016 at 14:31
So entailment: "My dog just got her rabies vaccination." Let's call that utterance p. My dog is a truth-maker for p IFF my dog exists, and if I say "M...
December 12, 2016 at 14:24
Deflationists don't expect an answer to that question to be forthcoming, but they aren't truth anti-realists. Truth is a concept that's too basic to d...
December 12, 2016 at 14:07
I don't care. I need to be a genius so people won't make fun of me.
December 12, 2016 at 02:08
And steroids.
December 12, 2016 at 02:03
Sincerity would be another way to put it. You're either sincere or you aren't. There was never any need to tangle ourselves up regarding the real exte...
December 11, 2016 at 18:57
it could be. Where I come from it's part of commonplace greetings...usually between people meeting for the first time. Genuine means real...as opposed...
December 11, 2016 at 16:26
Deflation isn't so bad. You know what truth means in the sense that you know how to use the word. There probably isn't any definition that would be us...
December 11, 2016 at 01:33
A ritual is just a form...marriage, funerals..yes, westerners have rituals. The book I read about Confucius said his world was pervasively ritualized....
December 10, 2016 at 17:32
Sure I wasn't contradicting anybody. Just offering a perspective that's cool to me. It involved Confucius. What dickhead would disagree with him? ;)
December 10, 2016 at 14:07
Correspondence doesn't have value as definition of truth. It obviously has some value though. More later...
December 10, 2016 at 12:02
Consider a handshake. What's going on when there's genuineness there? Confucius says breathe life into rituals. Contemporary westerners don't have as ...
December 10, 2016 at 11:47
Interestingly, the SEP article on truthmakers starts with an image of clapping hands to convey how truthmakers and truth-bearers relate... each one is...
December 10, 2016 at 02:59
The SEP mentions several candidates for how we might understand truthmaker. This one is cool: The challenge to entailment is confusing and involves ne...
December 10, 2016 at 00:59
You're sounding like Austin, but he didn't use "proposition." I don't hold that there's one way the words should be used. But no worthwhile discussion...
December 10, 2016 at 00:56
Yes. Looking at the question with Redundancy goggles on, the question: "By virtue of what is P true?" doesn't make a lot of sense. Redundancy says tha...
December 10, 2016 at 00:54
I'm used to Scott Soames' terminology. Propositions are expressed by uttered sentences. "Proposition" and "statement" mean the same thing.
December 09, 2016 at 22:31
So Correspondence says that truth is independent of knowledge, right? So how is the ontology of unstated statements handled? Or is it?
December 09, 2016 at 21:11
Dude. That's why it's called the t-sentence rule.
December 09, 2016 at 20:19
I think the SEP description covers the appropriate bases. The t-sentence doesn't have anything to do with propositions...
December 09, 2016 at 19:49