You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Caldwell

Comments

An apocalypse.
November 05, 2021 at 04:43
Ah I see. :)
November 05, 2021 at 01:19
Okay. Those are his analysis tests to come up with his theory on perception. Semantics (the meaning we attribute to what we perceive), the epistemic v...
November 05, 2021 at 01:16
That's not substitution. :blush:
November 05, 2021 at 00:54
Oh cause you said morals deal with values not fact. So, I countered it with a response.
November 04, 2021 at 05:01
Hello. Your existential crisis is a very common experience. So, this is absolutely real and understandable. First things first. Don't worry about stud...
November 04, 2021 at 04:50
Not a problem.
November 04, 2021 at 04:22
Will do. I can imagine it right now, it's very good. Thank you.
November 04, 2021 at 04:19
For one thing, Schopenhauer's argument for morals cites suffering as a condition of humanity. I'd say, he is using a fact that there is suffering. (Th...
November 04, 2021 at 04:18
Copied. Thanks, TC.
November 04, 2021 at 04:09
The values are vigorously argued, however. A valid argument is what's common among these disciplines. They make use of facts to support their argument...
November 04, 2021 at 03:24
:up:
November 04, 2021 at 03:08
Hi TC. You posted a salad recipe before. Would you mind repeating it here again? What was the dressing?
November 04, 2021 at 03:01
haha! Good catch! :blush:
November 04, 2021 at 01:24
This thread should be re-titled The Essence of MadFool because the posts are talking about MadFool.
November 03, 2021 at 04:53
:sweat: You guys are killing me.
November 03, 2021 at 04:52
:up:
November 03, 2021 at 04:50
I'll give you the clues that gave you away: :ok:
November 03, 2021 at 04:06
No you did not say self. It was an implication from C's post and yours. It is relevant in the exchanges between you and C. You certainly missed the ph...
November 03, 2021 at 03:13
Yes. The sense of self is a "modern" notion. Believe it or not, "self" did not exist in the cerebral happenings of humans in the primitive era. This i...
November 03, 2021 at 02:54
A bunch of high IQ individuals who couldn't function without a person next to them.
November 03, 2021 at 01:19
Cause of the Antichrist.
November 03, 2021 at 01:14
Yes. Very cartesian.
November 02, 2021 at 04:27
Yes. And an observer/perceiver must be allowed to have presuppositions as well -- presuppositions which are apart from the object of perception.
November 02, 2021 at 04:27
No. From personal experience. I have connections. :cool:
November 02, 2021 at 04:15
No longer a fan. I gave up on him a while back.
November 02, 2021 at 04:13
This is understandably a concern. I wouldn't use the word either. If we apply the problem philosophically, perhaps we can look at metaphorical and ana...
October 31, 2021 at 22:54
I don't have a book reference -- I actually lost my collection of books, which I intend to replace once I get the time and motivation. But the one thi...
October 31, 2021 at 19:00
Ah! Thank you, T Clark. As always, better err on the side of a doormat, than to engage a raging ...
October 31, 2021 at 18:54
Congratulations!
October 31, 2021 at 18:41
I was joining you in your declaration of nonsense, not fighting against you. Too bad you missed that sarcasm against Husserl. Or was it my fault? :) S...
October 31, 2021 at 18:31
Feel much better now, DecheleSchilder? Good to release it from your system. :) Welcome to the forum.
October 31, 2021 at 18:11
People haven't forgiven the Astros.
October 31, 2021 at 03:39
Christ!
October 31, 2021 at 03:37
As I would like to say so myself -- I did not create a bullshit account so I could log in to this nonsense!
October 30, 2021 at 23:47
And just so you know, Husserl, if I was reading it correctly, believes that the existence of objects is a necessity. Why would he say something like t...
October 30, 2021 at 23:44
Then, are you an observer or the perceiver? Mental states, as a phenomena, are supposed to be latent (in philosophical term) to the perceiver, but an ...
October 30, 2021 at 23:36
This is a common mistake found in posts in perception/phenomenology threads. Try to be clear about what it is you're referring to.
October 30, 2021 at 23:05
Good luck, Tiff. Do the Power Pose!
October 30, 2021 at 21:40
I concur.
October 30, 2021 at 21:05
No it isn't. In fact this would fall under JS Mill's harm principle. Spreading lies which harm others is an offense. We have a legal name for it if di...
October 30, 2021 at 18:41
In a collective mind, there would be. But the OP is talking about a single individual with no prior or current connection to another human or any livi...
October 30, 2021 at 18:39
She would be fine if she had innate skills to fend for herself. But as far as seeking another "human" or a male partner, or even knowing she could car...
October 30, 2021 at 17:20
I have no more comment for you. But thank you for the effort.
October 30, 2021 at 05:04
I don't think you understand my contention. Please direct this to Josh's post.
October 30, 2021 at 04:51
Good question. I don't think the way to argue about phenomenology's idealism is to disprove it. Nor is it reasonable to do so in favor of materialism....
October 30, 2021 at 03:59
The very last wonder of the universe!
October 29, 2021 at 23:30
On the off chance that you were suggesting that the brain is inferior to computer memory. So, pre-emptively, I was 'warning' you not to. :chin:
October 29, 2021 at 23:19
I don't know about cryptic comments.
October 29, 2021 at 23:16